raw_content:
Narrative:
Client #1 became upset and started to yell at staff and staff redirected the client #1 to calm down and informed them that they would be able to go shopping later. Staff denied the allegation stating the staff did not speak inappropriately to clients. It was alleged that staff does not provide adequate food service to minors. Staff denied the allegation stating the facility provides three meals and snacks between the meals. Menu of the day including snack is written on the white board every day. Breakfast is served form 7am to 8am, lunch hour is from 12pm to 1pm, and dinner is served from 6pm to 7pm. The morning snack is from 10am to 10:30am, afternoon snack is from 3pm to 4:30pm and bedtime snack hour is from 8:30pm to 9pm. Clients could have their snacks during snack time which they have three options for each snack time. Clients could also have snack from snack basket and client refrigerator which they are restocked at 8am and 10pm. Interview with clients provided that they are provided with meals and snacks. The statements obtained from the confidential interviews did not provide sufficient information to corroborate the allegation. Based on the information gathered, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted. Appeal rights explained and a copy of this report, and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility representative.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 6, 2023, at 2: PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Karen Suh conducted a follow-up complaint inspection to deliver the finding of an investigation concerning to the allegation above. The LPA met with the representative named above and discussed the finding. The investigation included confidential interviews that consisted of but were not limited to: two clients and one staff on March 16, 2023, one staff on August 21, 2023. The LPA was unable to interview six clients as they refused to be interviewed. The LPA was unable to contact the County Social Worker (CSW) after several attempts. The LPA reviewed Clients Register, Personnel report, Needs and Services Plans, Meal Menu for January, February, March, grocery shopping receipts for January and February, and the Special Incident Report occurred on March 4, 2023 of client #1. It was alleged that staff speaks to a minor in an inappropriate manner. It was revealed that client #1 wanted to go for her shopping and staff informed them that they need to wait for their peer to return as the client needs to be on one-on-one supervision for shopping. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Yan Yeung LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Karen Suh LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/06/2023

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Joellen Gutierrez, Administrator


state: CA

facility_name: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOME

summary: Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated - 1 allegation

raw_content:
Narrative:
It was alleged that staff did not seek medical attention for a minor under the influence. Staff denied the above allegation. Based on confidential interviews with staff and records reviewed, clients are offered medical attention upon returning to facility from an unauthorized absence under the influence. There were seven clients that live in the facility. Five clients refused to conduct an interview and two clients were on an unauthorized absence. Four staff were interviewed. All four staff stated that medical attention is offered when clients are under the influence. Confidential interviews and records reviewed revealed that medical attention is offered, the clients decline medical attention when it is offered, and that the medical attention refusal is documented in SIRs. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as the LIC 811 was provided to the facility representative.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 14, 2023, at 9: AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Timika Martin conducted a follow-up complaint inspection to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation concerning the allegations listed above. LPA Martin met with the facility representative named above and discussed the findings. During the investigation, LPA Martin conducted a record review on 7/18/23 and obtained copies of client's roster, Needs and Service plan, Special Incident Reports (SIRs). LPA Martin requested copies of the LIC 500, staff contact information, staff shift schedule and staff trainings. Confidential interviews were conducted by LPA Martin with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Staff 3 (S3) and Staff 4 (S4) on 7/18/23. Client 1 (C1), Client 2 (C2), Client (C3) and Client 6 (C6) refused to conduct interviews on 7/18/23; Client 4 (C4) and Client 5 (C5) were on an unauthorized absence on 7/18/23 (See Confidential Names List Form LIC 811 dated September 14, 2023). UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Timika Martin LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/14/2023

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

report_type: Complaint Investigation

complaint_status: unsubstantiated


raw_content:
Narrative:
It was alleged that a client has access to alcohol and drugs. Staff denied the above allegations. LPA conducted interviews with four staff. Two staff stated that they are unsure where clients get drugs and alcohol, one staff stated that a client that no longer lives at the facility would get drugs and share them with other clients at the facility and one staff stated that it was mentioned that a client was selling drugs. Based on confidential interviews and records reviewed, clients are returning to the facility after unauthorized absences under the influence and a search is conducted upon their return. It was also alleged that staff does not provide adequate supervision to minor in care. Staff denied the above allegation. All four staff stated that staff are always present at the facility, room checks are conducted every 15-30 minutes, and staff are stationed both upstairs and downstairs at the facility. It was also alleged that staff does not seek mental health treatment for minor in care. Staff denied the above allegation. All four staff interviewed stated that mental health services are provided to clients at the facility. Based on confidential interviews and records reviewed, mental health services are provided but it is optional. Based on records reviewed, there are times when clients refused to attend their appointments, appointments are missed due to clients being on an unauthorized absence and some clients attend their appointments which are all documented. There were seven clients living in the facility. Five clients refused to conduct an interview and two clients were on an unauthorized absence. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report as well as the LIC 811 was provided to the facility representative.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 14, 2023, at 9: AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Timika Martin conducted a follow-up complaint inspection to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation concerning the allegations listed above. LPA Martin met with the facility representative named above and discussed the findings. During the investigation, LPA Martin conducted a record review on 7/18/23 and obtained copies of client's roster, Needs and Service plan, Special Incident Reports (SIRs). LPA Martin requested copies of the LIC 500, staff contact information, staff shift schedule and staff trainings. Confidential interviews were conducted by LPA Martin with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Staff 3 (S3) and Staff 4 (S4) on 7/18/23. Client 1 (C1), Client 2 (C2), Client (C3) and Client 6 (C6) refused to conduct interviews on 7/18/23; Client 4 (C4) and Client 5 (C5) were on an unauthorized absence on 7/18/23, Reporting Party on 8/21/23 (See Confidential Names List Form LIC 811 dated September 14, 2023). UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Timika Martin LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/14/2023

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:


summary: Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated

raw_content:
Investigation Findings:
13On October 2, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Johanna Lofton, conducted a follow up inspection visit to Daughter Project Girls Home with the purpose of delivering findings for the above complaint allegations. LPA Lofton met with Joellen Gutierrez, Administrator, and discussed the findings. During the complaint investigation, LPA Lofton conducted confidential interviews with facility staff, and clients. During the conducted interviews and clients denied the allegation. C1 reported that the incident never happened because that was not what she reported and that C2 was no longer at the facility. It was reported by interviewed parties that C1 and C2 were roommates and C1 just didn't feel comfortable with C2 in her room, and she wanted her room just to herself. Facility staff denied having any knowledge of such incident. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it cannot be determined whether the above allegation occurred. Based upon interviews, the complaint findings are unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was emailed to the above-named facility staff. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Tira Logan LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Johanna Lofton LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 1

met_with: Joellen Gutierrez- Facility Administrator


raw_content:
Investigation Findings:
13On October 2, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Johanna Lofton, conducted a follow up inspection visit to Daughter Project Girls Home with the purpose of delivering findings for the above complaint allegations. LPA Lofton met with Joellen Gutierrez, Administrator, and discussed the findings. During the complaint investigation, LPA Lofton conducted confidential interviews with facility staff and clients. During the interviews, facility staff and clients denied the allegations. Facility staff reported that S1 was just trying to defend herself from the clients since she was jumped. Furthermore, C1 reported she was not hit by staff. C1 reported they jumped the staff because they wanted to go in the office and destroy everything. Clients reported being upset and bored at the facility. No corroboration of the complaint allegation from the complainant. Facility staff provided LPA Lofton with SIR and showed that the incident was reported to the Department.ased o Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it cannot be determined whether the above allegation occurred. Based upon interviews, the complaint findings are unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was emailed to the above-named facility staff. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Tira Logan LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Johanna Lofton LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 3


raw_content:
Narrative:
It was alleged that the facility staff neglected and did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a client (C1) having access to a firearm, and drugs resulting in C1 posing a risk to the other clients in the STRTP. Staff (S1, S2, S3, and S4) denied the alleged allegations indicating that the facility is properly staffed meeting the STRTP Interim Licensing Standards staff-to-client ratio 1:4. Before clients enter the facility, two staff members will ask them to conduct a self-search. The clients will be asked to remove any baggy clothing, such as jackets or sweaters, and empty out all pockets. Additionally, the staff members will visually check all bags and if needed, pending on the clients' history staff will scan the client with a security wand (Metal detector) to prevent contraband from entering the facility. Some staff members have reported that clients who are aware of their limitations have hidden contraband in areas that staff are not authorized to search. As a result, staff have discovered prohibited items during routine cleaning of the clients' rooms or during random room checks. Staff logs and properly disposes of contraband and reports it to relevant agencies. Staff indicated that once informed by C1's therapist on the statements made by C1, staff conducted a room search of C1's room and the adjacent joining room, however, no contraband was found. Staff indicated as a precaution C2 was moved to the downstairs room next to the staff office to provide better supervision. Furthermore, staff conducted an emergency removal of C1 notifying C CSW, and the bed was terminated. Staff further disclosed that C1 after her visit with the therapist and family was transported to Kern Medical Center in Bakersfield for further evaluation. Information obtained from CSW and C1s therapist indicated that the proper procedures were taken by facility staff and have no concerns about the care and supervision that the staff is providing clients. Therefore, based on the information received, the above allegation(s) are determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. There are no deficiencies to be cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the (LIC 811) was left with the STRTP facility manager.

Investigation Findings:
13On November 02, 2023 at 11: AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliet Robles on behalf of Winston Moroney conducted a complaint inspection to the above Facility and met with the Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) Facility Manager Saquintha Magee to deliver the finding for the above complaint allegation. On May 23, 2023, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division received a complaint from the Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB) with the following allegation(s): Minor has access to a firearm, A minor has access to drugs, and A minor's conduct poses a risk to the other minors in the home. The investigation of the above allegations was conducted by LPA Moroney, and it consisted of but was not limited to a review of records, including the client's needs and services plans, medical records, and interviews with four staff members S3 on 6/30/23, S1 on 7/3/23, S4 on 7/11/23, CSW on 7/11/23, and the Behavioral Health Therapist on 7/11/23. No statements were obtained from clients due to 5 of 5 clients declining to be interviewed. (Reference Confidential Names Form LIC 811, dated November 02, 2023). UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Yan Yeung LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Juliet Robles LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 11/02/2023

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Saquintha Magee


raw_content:
Narrative:
No statements were obtained from clients C1, C3, due to declining or were currently AWOL (C2). (Reference Confidential Names Form LIC 811, dated November 02, 2023). There were allegations that the staff at the facility did not take necessary measures to prevent illegal drug usage within the premises. The facility also lacks proper supervision which has led to minors going AWOL. Additionally, it has been reported that the facility does not provide a safe environment for minors who are under their care. The staff (S1, S2, S3, and S4) have denied the allegations made against them. They have stated that the safety of their clients is their top priority, and they take all necessary steps to ensure compliance with the Short-Term Therapeutic Interim Licensing Standards. Before any client enters the facility, they are required to undergo a self-search where they must remove items of clothing such as sweaters and jackets and turn out their pockets in front of two staff members. Additionally, staff members conduct a visual check of all bags that clients bring into the facility to prevent contraband from entering. Although these measures are in place, there have been instances where clients have managed to sneak contraband into the facility by hiding them in areas that staff members are not allowed to search. Nevertheless, due to the facility maintaining a 1:4 staff-to-client ratio and providing adequate supervision, the staff have been able to confiscate contraband from clients by conducting random room checks or while cleaning their rooms. The staff at the facility constantly reminds all clients about the significance of not going AWOL and the potential dangers they may face if they do so. They emphasize the importance of successfully completing their program. Whenever the staff hears clients talking about going AWOL, they intervene by offering different activities that the individuals enjoy, like arts and crafts, manicures, or pedicures. Moreover, they try to identify the underlying reasons that lead the client to go AWOL in the first place. Information obtained from SCSW indicated they have no concerns about the care and supervision that the staff is providing clients nor did their client ever report concerns while residing at the facility. Therefore, based on the information received, the above allegation(s) are determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. There are no deficiencies to be cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the (LIC 811) was left with the STRTP facility manager.

Investigation Findings:
13On November 02, 2023 at 12: PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliet Robles on behalf of Winston Moroney conducted a complaint inspection to the above Facility and met with the Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) Facility Manager Saquintha Magee to deliver the finding for the above complaint allegations. On May 30, 2023, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division received a complaint from the Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB) with the following allegation(s): Facility staff does not prevent illegal drug use in the facility, Lack of supervision resulting in minor AWOLing, and staff not providing a safe environment for minor(s) in care. The investigation of the above allegations was conducted by LPA's Raymond Wu and LPA Winston Moroney, and it consisted of but was not limited to a review of records, including the client's needs and services plans, medical records, Needs and Service Plans, and interviews with four staff members S1, S2, S3 on 6/8/23, S4 on 10/16/23, and SCSW on 10/16/23. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Yan Yeung LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Juliet Robles LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 11/02/2023

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:


raw_content:
Narrative:
Allegations were made that the staff failed to provide adequate supervision, leading to clients using drugs on the premises. It was also claimed that the staff commented inappropriately to the youths under their care. However, staff members (S1, S2, S3, and S4) revealed that the facility adheres to the Short Term Residential Therapeutic Program Interim Licensing Standards, which require a 1:4 staff-to-client ratio. Depending on the needs of the facility, there are three or more staff members present at all times. The staff makes every effort to prevent contraband from entering the facility by conducting visual searches of individuals, requiring them to empty their pockets and remove outer clothing like jackets and baggy sweaters, and conducting visual bag checks on all bags brought in by clients. Additionally, staff conduct wand scans on clients to prevent contraband from entering the facility as some clients have been known to hide contraband on their bodies where staff is not permitted to search. Despite having guidelines and procedures in place, staff have, on occasion, found clients in possession of contraband. Any confiscated items are logged and discarded by staff. The staff continuously reminds and educates clients on the dangers of using illegal substances. Staff members denied making inappropriate comments to the youths and emphasized that such behavior would not be tolerated and would be dealt with accordingly. All staff members are trauma-informed and understand the importance of their role in the client's treatment plan. According to the (CSW), they visit the facility once a week or more frequently, depending on the needs of their client (C1). The CSW reported that they have no concerns about the care and supervision provided by the facility staff to their client. The CSW also revealed that C1 struggles with substance abuse, but the facility staff and their support team have been addressing this issue by encouraging C1 to participate in their services. Therefore, based on the information received, the above allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with the Facility Manager. There are no deficiencies to be cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the (LIC 811) was left with the Facility Manager.

Investigation Findings:
13On February 1, 2024, at 5: PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Winston Moroney conducted a complaint inspection at the above facility and met with the Facility Manager Saquintha Magee. The purpose of the inspection was to deliver the findings for the above-referenced complaint allegations. On July 28, 2023, the Community Care Licensing Division of the California Department of Social Services received a complaint regarding the Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB): the facility staff do not prevent youths from using drugs in the facility, and the facility staff make inappropriate comments to the youths. This LPA conducted the investigation of the above allegation(s) and it consisted of but was not limited to a review of records, including the children's needs and services plans, medical records, and interviews with the four staff members (S1, S2, and S3) on 8/3/2023, S4 on 8/7/23, and the CSW on 8/2/23. No statements were obtained from C1, C2, C3, and C4 due to clients declining to provide statements. (Reference Confidential Names Form LIC 811, dated February 24, 2024). UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Winston Moroney LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 02/01/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Saquintha Magee - Facility Manager


summary: Complaint Investigation - Substantiated

raw_content:
Narrative:
Per Facility Manager the carpet was cleaned by a cleaning company on April 4th, 2024. But the urine odor is still in the room since it has penetrated the carpet. Facility Manager stated that clients wash their own bedding as needed, but for C1 the bedding is cleaned by staff. Staff inspects the bedrooms when clients are out of their bedrooms and check on them every 30 minutes and depending on the children's needs, it may be less than that time period. Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure cleanliness of the client's bedroom due to client urinating on the carpeted bedroom floor. There continues to be a strong urine odor in the bedroom though it has been recently cleaned. This poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care. The following type B deficiencies are being issued today. A copy of this report was discussed and reviewed with Erin Herring and was provided to the facility administrator. Appeal Rights were issued and discussed. Exit interview was conducted. Page 2 of 2

Investigation Findings:
13On April 6, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pedro Ramos conducted an unannouced inspection visit to the above named facility with the purpose of conducting an investigation for the above complaint allegations. LPA met with Erin Herring,Senior Facility Manager and discussed the allegations. Facility staff present was interviewed, clients present were interviewed and a tour of the facility was conducted. The five bedrooms in facility were toured. During the tour of the bedrooms, LPA was able to detect a strong urine odor coming from C1's bedroom. LPA detected the urine odor as soon as he entered the bedroom. Facility Manager shared that there is a client in care that urinates in the bedroom. Staff cleaned C1's bedroom as soon as they became aware of the strong urine ordor in the room. Facility Administrator stated that staff was not aware that C1 was urinating in the bedroom on the carpeted floor. SubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Tira Logan LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Pedro Ramos LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: 157806794

met_with: Erin Herring,Senior Facility Manager

complaint_status: SUBSTANTIATED


raw_content:
Narrative:
The Following Allegation was reported: 1. The facility staff did not ensure that a safety plan was in place for the minor in care. During confidential interviews with staff members, the following information was obtained: All three staff members provided similar responses, explaining that multiple attempts to discourage C1's inappropriate behaviors and unexcused absences were conducted. Staff member interviewees continued that they followed the AWOL program policy to enable clients to meet certain goals and responsibilities, which allowed the clients to gradually earn more independence. Staff stated that they continuously educated the youth about the dangers of AWOLing and encouraged them to participate in a CSEC-focused curriculum through programs like the "COOL Aunt" series, "Run to Rescue" program, and attending two scheduled behavioral intervention sessions every week, to learn and practice their coping skills. Moreover, the staff encouraged the client to attend weekly substance use disorder treatment services. However, due to the client's personal rights and the facility not being a lockdown facility, the client (C1) refused to attend the programs and participate in the services provided by the facility's mental health or outside corresponding agencies. Therefore, based on the information received, the above allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with the Foster Family Agency. There are no deficiencies to be cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the (LIC 811) was left with the STRTP Facility Manager.

Investigation Findings:
13On April 11, 2024, at 11: AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Timika Martin and Pamela Silva conducted a complaint inspection at the above Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) on belhalf of Winston Moroney and met with the Facility Manager, Saquintha Magee. The purpose of the inspection was to deliver the findings regarding the complaint allegation(s). On September 11, 2023, the Community Care Licensing Division of the California Department of Social Services received a complaint from the Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB) with the following allegation(s): The facility staff did not ensure that a safety plan was in place for the minor in care. This LPA conducted the investigation of the above allegation(s) and it consisted of but was not limited to a review of records, including the children's needs and services plans, medical records, and interviews with the three staff members on 10/11/2023. Clients (C2, C3, and C4) declined to provide a statement. No statement was obtained from C1 due to being AWOL. (Reference Confidential Names Form LIC 811, dated April 11, 2024). UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Timika Martin LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 04/11/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Saquintha Magee, Facility Manager


summary: Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated - 3 allegations

raw_content:
Narrative:
Page The Department received a complaint alleging facility staff are sex trafficking clients in care. Staff denied the allegation and denied knowledge of other staff engaging in trafficking clients. In addition, the facility administrator reported staff are trained to immediately report incidents involving staff and child exploitation. Statements obtained from confidential interviews conducted did not support the allegation. All clients interviewed denied being sex trafficked or witnessing sex trafficking at the facility. Statements obtained from interviews conducted with social workers revealed a client reported to be one of the victims in the complaint has a history of making false allegations of sexual exploitation. Based on information gathered from interviews conducted and record review the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the standard of the preponderance of evidence has not been met. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the above-mentioned facility representative. No deficiencies were cited.

Investigation Findings:
13A follow up complaint inspection was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst LPA Christopher Larios on 8/13/24 at 11: AM. During the inspection LPA Larios met with Facility Manager Saquintha Magee. The purpose of the inspection was to deliver findings regarding the above mentioned complaint allegation. The investigation was conducted by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) State Investigation Ruben Munoz and LPA Larios. During the course of the investigation SI Munoz conducted interviews with a social worker on 7/15/24 and three facility clients between 7/16/24 & 7/18/24. SI Munoz attempted to interview a facility client on 7/16/24 however, the client declined to provide a statement. In addition, LPA Larios conducted interviews with five social workers between 7/29/24 & 8/8/24, three facility staff on 8/8/24 and one facility client on 8/13/24. Also, LPA Larios conducted a record review on 7/18/24 and obtained copies of staff and clients rosters, needs and services plans and incident reports. (Continued on page 2) UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Christopher Larios LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 08/13/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion:
- Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
- Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 0


raw_content:
Narrative:
The investigation revealed that at least one client observed that the Staff pushed Ref. #1, one client observed that a Staff pushed Ref. #1, but was unable to identify the Staff and one client did not recall. According to the Administrator, it was difficult to recall, but recalled that Ref. #1 jumped on the Staff's back. The LPA observed that approximately 156 incident reports and Law Enforcement Contact Reports had been submitted by the facility to MPCRP for Ref. #1 between December 27, 2023 and April 9, 2024. The LPA reviewed approximately 33% of the incident reports and observed a few involving vape pens. The LPA did not observe any incident reports involving the Staff pushing Ref. #1. The CSW indicated that Ref. #1 has had a lot of placements and did not recall whether Ref. #1 told the CSW that a Staff pushed Ref. #1. The LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. There was no preponderance of the evidence to substantiate the allegations. So, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. There are no deficiencies to be cited regarding these allegations. A copy of this complaint was provided to the facility representative.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 11, 2024 at 1:05 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Karen McGee, delivered the findings of a complaint investigation to Program Coordinator, Elizabeth Sausedo. On March 22, 2024, the Monterey Park Children's Residential Program (MPCRP), received a complaint with the above mentioned allegations. Confidential interviews were conducted that included, but were not limited to: one client, Ref. #2 at the facility on August 10, 2024; two clients, Ref. #3 and #4 via telephone on September 3, 2024; Administrator via telephone on September 4, 2024; and County Social Worker (CSW) for client Ref. #1 via telephone on September 9, 2024. After several attempts, the LPA was unable to interview the victim, Client Ref. #1, or witness Ref. #5. The LPA did not interview Staff, Ref. #6, because the Staff had terminated their employment in July 2024. The LPA reviewed Ref. #1's Needs and Services Plan, Placement History and incident reports. There was a statement that the Staff pushed Ref. #1 in efforts to confiscate a vape pen that was on Ref. #1's dresser. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Jean Herring LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Karen McGee LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION MONTEREY PARK CRP RO, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/11/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Elizabeth Sausedo


raw_content:
Narrative:
Staff ask if they want to do an activity with staff or go on a stress drive. Staff stated the clients are encouraged not to run away and advised on the dangers of running away. It was alleged that the facility allows clients to smoke marijuana in the facility. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated the facility is not allowing clients to smoke marijuana in the facility. Staff encourage clients to refrain from using substances and remind them about dangers and long-term effects of substance use. When staff become aware of clients using substances in the facility either by observance or smell, staff request the clients to surrender the contraband. If clients do not surrender the contraband, staff increase clients' wellness checks and conduct a thorough room checks. Staff also reminds clients of the facility rules and encourages them to participate in the substance recovery program that is offered. It was also alleged that the clients in the facility are being trafficked. Staff stated they reported anything involving CSEC activities. Staff stated special incident reports are generated when CSEC activity was found out. Staff stated they have not observed or heard of clients being recruiting for CSEC activities. The LPA was unable to obtain any statements from clients as they declined to interviewed. The statements obtained from the confidential interviews did not provide sufficient information to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection. An exit interview was conducted. Appeal rights explained and a copy of this report, and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility representative.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 25, 2024, at 12: PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Caitlin Chambers, and Karen Suh, conducted a follow-up complaint inspection to the facility above to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation. LPAs met with the representative named above and discussed the findings. The investigation included confidential interviews that consisted of but were not limited to: LPA Suh conducted interviews with three staff on April 18, 2024, Administrator on July 15, 2024, and September 24, 2024. The LPA was unable to interview six clients (see Confidential Names LIC 811, dated September 24, 2024) as they declined to be interviewed. LPA Suh reviewed AWOL Policy, Substance Use Policy, Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (CSEC) trainings provided to staff, and Special Incident Reports. It was alleged that the facility failed to prevent clients from leaving the facility. Staff stated they cannot stop clients from leaving the facility. When clients leaving the facility, staff follow to the door. Staff try to redirect them from leaving the facility and offers to talk with direct care staff or mental health staff. (cont.) UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Yan Yeung LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Karen Suh LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/25/2024

met_with: Saquintha Magee, Facility manager


raw_content:
Investigation Findings:
13On 10/21/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Johanna Aracena conducted an unannounced follow-up inspection visit to the facility with the purpose of delivering findings. During the visit LPA Aracena met with Facility Manager Nickie Thompson and discussed the findings. During the investigation of the allegations, LPA Aracena conducted confidential interviews with facility staff. LPA Aracena was not able to interview the complainant during the investigation.Through confidential interviews LPA Aracena collected information which refuted the allegation. Interviewed parties denied not receiving payment for work. It was denied the facility lacks supplies in order for the facility to run smoothly. It was confirmed the facility has always had plenty of food and supplies for the clients. Confidential interviews raised no concerns of lack of funds. Due to the information obtained during the investigation, it cannot be determined whether the above allegations occurred. Based on the compiled information the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the allegations occurred. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided to the above-named staff. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Tira Logan LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Johanna Aracena LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 1

met_with: Nickie Thompson- Facility Manager


raw_content:
Investigation Findings:
13On November 10, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Johanna Aracena conducted an unannounced visit to Daughter Project Girls Home STRTP with purpose of delivering findings for the above complaint allegation. LPA Aracena met with Facility Manager Nickie Thompson and discussed the findings.During the investigation of the allegations, LPA Aracena conducted confidential interviews with facility staff, facility clients, and County Social Worker. LPA Aracena was not able to interview the complainant or C1. While conducting confidential interviews the allegation of minors sexually exploited another minor in care was denied. Confidential interviews raised no pertinent information that any client was being exploited by other clients. Due to the information obtained during the investigation, it cannot be determined whether the above allegations occurred. Based on the compiled information the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the allegations occurred. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report provided to the above-named staff. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Tira Logan LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Johanna Aracena LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 1


raw_content:
Narrative:
There was a statement that Client Ref. #2 was a witness, but when Ref. #2 was interviewed, Ref. #2 did not disclose this incident. The Staff denied that clients were refused food. The CSW indicated that the clients do not like the meals that are prepared or how they were prepared. The CSW indicated that the client may have been attempting to get cash from a family member to purchase Uber Eats. The LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. There was no preponderance of the evidence to substantiate the allegations. So, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. There are no deficiencies to be cited regarding these allegations. A copy of this complaint was provided to the facility representative.

Investigation Findings:
13On December 18, 2024 at 12:45 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Karen McGee, delivered the findings of a complaint investigation to the facility. The LPA met with Facility Manager, Sanquintha Magee On August 14, 2024, the Monterey Park Children's Residential Program (MPCRP), received a complaint with the above mentioned allegations. Confidential interviews were conducted that included, but were not limited to: Client Ref. #1 on October 31, 2024 at the new placement; the County Social Worker (CSW) via telephone on October 28, 2024; the Administrator via telephone on November 4, 2024 and overnight staff via telephone on November 5, 2024. The LPA reviewed Ref. #1's Needs & Services Plan and incident reports. There was a statement made that staff would not allow Ref. #1 into the kitchen to eat something nor would they cook for Ref. #1 when Ref. #1 was hungry. The investigation revealed that the names of the staff could not be recalled. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Jean Herring LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Karen McGee LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION MONTEREY PARK CRP RO, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 12/18/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Sanquintha Magee


raw_content:
Narrative:
Page The Department received a complaint alleging that staff did not prevent clients from engaging in prostitution. Staff denied the allegation. Per statements obtained from confidential interviews conducted, clients independently and without outside influence of other persons left the facility at night to engage in prostitution. When interviewed staff explained the facility absent without leave (AWOL) protocol consists of engaging clients to ascertain their plan, verbal redirection and offering alternatives. Staff then shadow clients and after a specific amount of time report details of the clients last known whereabouts to law enforcement. Staff's statements were corroborated by clients. Statements obtained from interviews conducted with social workers indicate the clients were susceptible to prostitution due to the area the facility is located in. However, the facility has since relocated, which social workers believe will mitigate the client's risk. Based on information gathered from interviews conducted and record review the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the standard of the preponderance of evidence was not met. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was given to the above mentioned facility representative. No deficiencies were cited.

Investigation Findings:
13An unannounced follow up complaint inspection was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christopher Larios on 2/25/25, at 9: AM. During the inspection LPA Larios met with Facility Manager (FM) Jacki Tucker. The purpose of the inspection was to deliver findings regarding the above mentioned complaint allegation. The allegation was investigated by California Department of Social Services (CDSS) Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) State Investigator (SI) Christen Krogstad and LPA Larios. During the course of the investigation SI Krogstad conducted interviews with two social workers on 9/18/24 and one client on 9/26/24. LPA Larios conducted interviews with four clients on 1/24/25, two social workers and a client on 2/7/25 and three staff on 2/18/25. In addition, LPA Larios conducted a record review on 9/11/24 and obtained copies of a client's discharge report, needs and services plans, incident reports, LIC9020, LIC500 and staff contact information. (Continued on page 2) UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Christopher Larios LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 02/25/2025

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion:
- Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
- Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 0

met_with: Jacki Tucker


summary: Facility Evaluation

raw_content:
Narrative:
An informal office meeting was held at the Monterey Park Children's Residential Regional Office on the above date. Present in the meeting were Jennifer Jensen, Executive Director - Daughter Project Girls Home; Jean Herring, Licensing Program Analyst and Tira Logan, Licensing Program Manager. The purpose of the meeting was discussing the following concerns: - Facility does not have a qualified administrator. On 5/10/17, the licensing agency was notified of the resignation of the Facility Administrator, Bhavna Sharma. The facility designated Jennifer Ferrier to serve as the Administrator, however, the facility failed to submit the required documents for change of administrator, therefore, the department was unable to qualify Ms. Ferrier as the administrator. On 10/11/17, the licensing agency was notified of Ms. Ferrier's resignation and the designation of Yolanda Larios as the acting Administrator and Orion Martindale as the acting Facility Manager/Administrator I. Facility did not submit required documents for Ms. Larios and Mr. Martindale. During an annual/required inspection on 12/27/17, LPA Herring noted that the facility has not hired a qualified and currently group home certified administrator since the previous administrator, Bhavna Sharma left. Licensee was also advised of the Department's authority to revoke a group home license for failure to comply with all requirements regarding certified administrators. On 01/11/18, the group home Executive Director, Jennifer Jensen requested the department to evaluate her qualifications. The department determined Ms. Jensen's degree and experience meet the licensing requirements. However, she does not possess a group home administrator certificate. The facility will provide a written plan to ensure compliance with administrator requirements. A signed copy of this report was provided to the facility representative.

report_type: Facility Evaluation

met_with: Jennifer Jensen, Executive Director


summary: Facility Evaluation

raw_content:
Narrative:
On April 6, 2021 at 4: PM, Community Care Licensing - Monterey Park Regional Office (CCL-MPRO) conducted a virtual meeting with Daughter Project Girls Home (a Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program, STRTP) via Microsoft Teams meeting app. Remote meetings and tele-inspections of facilities are a part of Community Care Licensing Division's emergency response to the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Present at the meeting representing the Department were: Tira Logan-Shanks, Licensing Program Manager (LPM); and Jean Herring, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA). Present at the meeting representing the Short-term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) were: Jennifer Jensen, CEO; Charity Jensen, Head of Programs; Teodora Corbell, Administrator; and Ivette Diaz, Head of Service. Present at the meeting representing Kern County Department of Human Services (KCDHS) were: Monica Goodell, FFA & STRTP Liaison; and Erin Gillespie, Program Director-Family Services. Present at the meeting representing Kern Behavioral Health & Recovery Services (KBHRS) were: Jennie Sill, CSOC Administrator; Brenda Story, CCR Supervisor; Heather Williams, Recovery Specialist; and Jeanna Reynolds, Office Service Technician. The following was discussed: - Deficiency and Advisory notes (Technical Assistance and Technical Violations) issued to the facility on 4/6/21. (See Licensing Reports - LIC 809, LIC 809D and LIC 9102s dated 4/6/21.) KBHRS and KCDHS shared their concerns and comments (e.g. provider's ability to take in and carry out information; lack of organized protocols; need to implement a focused approach; issues with documentation; alarming number of AWOLs; provider's ability to demonstrate progress to partner agencies.) The licensee shared their progress since the last office meeting on 11/19/20 and their plans moving forward (e.g. hire a second administrator; possible relocation to minimize exposure to CSEC; redesign program statement/plan of operation; offer more activities to youth; evaluate behavior trends and pattern; develop new protocols to address runaways and other issues; provide more staff training; modify procedures for incident reporting.) The meeting ended at approximately 5: PM. A signed copy of this report was provided to licensee.


raw_content:
Narrative:
Interviews conducted with four (4) children identified that staff are not allowing children go to school and that staff are not enrolling them in the schools they wish to be at. Children stated they were not given the opportunity to choose what school they wanted to attend, and that staff are not allowing them to go every day. Documents reviewed identified children signing they understood the schedules and the schools they would be attending. Additionally, documents identified that children were enrolled to attend school on one day as the school agreement signed by children. Interviews conducted with county social workers identified working with facility and children to get enrolled in the proper schools during time in which facility relocated. It was also alleged; facility staff are not ensuring that minor is provided hygiene product. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that children are given opportunity to get hygiene items throughout the month depending on the need. Staff stated that facility also keeps additional hygiene items in cases of emergency if children may need it. Interviews conducted with all children identified not receiving hygiene items and that staff deny children from obtaining hygiene items. LPA toured facility and observed children to have hygiene items available and additional products within the facility for emergency purposes for all children in care. Furthermore, it was alleged facility staff are not ensuring that minor is provided an age-appropriate allowance. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that children receive allowances and sign that they obtained it. However, staff state that money is kept on a card and that children are encouraged to save some of their money. Children stated they are not given allowances and that staff do not provide them with the appropriate amounts of money for allowance. Documents reviewed identified children signing for receiving allowances and identified within their needs and service plans it identified how much children could maintain on their persons. It was alleged, facility staff are supplying alcohol to minors in care. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that children have sometimes come into the facility intoxicated or try to bring alcohol into the facility. However, staff stated if children are caught with contraband, they confiscate contraband and document incident to report to proper overseeing agencies. Children were unable to identify which staff if any supplied alcohol to children, when or where. Children were unable to provide a date of occurrence or how staff were able to get alcohol within the facility. Additionally, it was alleged facility staff are not preventing minors from using substances while in care. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that children have been observed passing vape pens and other contraband. Staff identified when they observe children using substances, they verbally ask children to hand over the contraband or if children do not give staff the contraband staff will confiscate it when observed available for staff to take away. Staff stated they document incidents and report incidents to overseeing agencies. LPA observed staff redirecting children when staff identified children were observed passing a vape pen. Staff stated they asked for children to stop and to hand over the vape pen and children did not. Staff completed incident reports to document incident. Interviews conducted with children identified that staff would confiscate their contraband or request they give it to them but that they don't want them to take it, so they don't give it to them. Children identified hiding contraband from staff. It was alleged, facility staff are not following proper reporting requirements involving minors in care. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated they report all incidents that happen in the facility within the time frames to meet reporting requirements. Staff stated that each shift documents what transpires on each shift and incident reports are sent out to overseeing agencies. Children were not able to identify if staff are reporting incidents. Children stated that things have transpired within the facility, but they don't feel as though staff report incidents as nothing is done about it. LPA received documents show casing various incidents transpiring within the facility. Lastly, it was alleged facility is in disrepair. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that facility was just relocated approximately 3 weeks ago. Staff stated that they are moving and transitioning a lot of things. Staff provided documentation that home is being exterminated regularly and that home is in the process of updating and transitioning. LPA observed home to be clean and free of obstructions. Facility had completed and full kitchen, rooms had adequate bedding and facility grounds were maintained. Interviews with children identified observing snakes in walls, rats, and bugs within the facility. Documents reviewed showed facility had recently completed a pre licensing and that facility had required items within the home to meet the needs of all children in care. Documents reviewed and interviews conducted showed that children are enrolled or in process of being enrolled in school and that children signed acknowledgment of school schedule. It was also identified that staff report incidents, confiscate contraband and do not supply or allow children to consume alcohol or controlled substances. Based on information gathered, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation was not met, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report Confidential Names Form, and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility representative. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection.

Investigation Findings:
13On 10/3/ Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Dawn Mahecha and Caitlin Chambers made an unannounced visit to the Daughters Project STRTP for the purpose of concluding the above complaint investigation. LPAs met with representative and discussed the following findings. Investigation consisted of the following: On 9/30/ LPA Brent Lockhart completed initial 10-day inspection to investigation (see LIC811 dated 9/30/2024). LPA Mahecha interviewed four (4) children on 9/19/2024 and facility manager. LPA toured facility and contacted county social worker. Investigation revealed the following: It was alleged Facility staff are not allowing minor to go to school. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that facility just moved to new location and that facility staff have been Facility staff stated they were also ensuring that the schools that children chose can meet children's needs. Staff stated that children signed school's enrollment forms and stated they understood the schedule and terms of the scheduled classes. working with county social workers and schools to ensure children are enrolled in schools they chose to be at. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Yan Yeung LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Dawn Mahecha LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION MONTEREY PARK CRP RO, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 10/03/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:


raw_content:
Narrative:
Staff stated that children sometimes miss the days in which they are scheduled to go get clothing due to being on runaway or because children may be under the influence. Staff stated that sometimes children can go another day in the month or if not, money is accumulated on a card that carries over month to month if not used. Children stated they have no clothing, and that facility does not allow them to buy clothing. Documents reviewed identified that children regularly run away from facility and that children destroyed or threw away most of their clothing based on wanting facility to buy all new clothing. LPA observed children to have clothing and facility to have extra clothing in cases of emergency for all children in care. It was also alleged; staff are not ensuring that minor(s) are provided enough food while in care. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that they pick up groceries weekly and that children are given required meals and afforded the opportunity to eat snacks and missed meals after hours by utilizing the snack area that is equipped with a refrigerator and microwave. Additionally, staff stated that children have scheduled times to go into the kitchen and get items but based on safety concerns children are not allowed to just go into the kitchen whenever they feel. Children stated that they are not given the opportunity to cook with staff like in the previous facility. Children stated that they do not have access to snacks or meals in between scheduled mealtimes. LPA observed required food supply in the kitchen for all children in care. LPA received documentation to show food purchased and observed snack area that is accessible to all children in care. Snack refrigerator had packaged and dated meals that showcased food not eaten or missed for children to heat up at later dates. Lastly, it was alleged staff are not adequately supervising minors in care. Staff stated that one to two staff are usually rotating in the home monitoring the children. Staff stated that the cameras are monitored by the Administrator when Administrator is off grounds, but that staff do not use camera system as a means of monitoring children. Staff stated that a plan for camera usage was submitted to licensing and that plan was approved by overseeing agencies. Children did not deny or confirm allegation in that enough staff were or were not present within the facility. Children stated that facility had issues and that staff do nothing to circumvent issues within the facility. Documents reviewed and observations made identified children had required amounts of clothing, food and are supervised adequately by staff. Interviews conducted with additional witnesses identified no concerns or issues with children being placed in the home. Based on information gathered, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation was not met, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report Confidential Names Form, and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility representative. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection.

Investigation Findings:
13On 10/3/ Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Dawn Mahecha and Caitlin Chambers made an unannounced visit to the Daughters Project STRTP for the purpose of concluding the above complaint investigation. LPAs met with representative and discussed the following findings. Investigation consisted of the following: On 9/19/ LPA completed initial 10-day inspection to investigation and interviewed facility manager and four (4) children (see confidential names, LIC811 dated 9/19/2024). LPA Mahecha interviewed four (4) children on 9/19/2024 and facility manager. LPA toured facility and contacted county social worker. Investigation revealed the following: It was alleged staff are not ensuring that minor is provided with an adequate supply of clothing while in care. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that children are given an allowance of clothing and are afforded the opportunity to shop once or twice a month. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Yan Yeung LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Dawn Mahecha LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION MONTEREY PARK CRP RO, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 10/03/2024

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:


raw_content:
Narrative:
Investigation revealed the following: It was alleged that staff does not treat minor with dignity or respect. Staff denied the allegation. Staff stated that all children are treated with dignity and respect. Staff stated that children have expressed no issues or concerns with staff. Staff stated that children do not like being at the facility far away from the city and that children are making up allegations to leave. Interviews conducted with one (1) child identified having no issues with staff being disrespectful or not treating children with dignity. Interviews conducted with three (3) children identified multiple allegations being investigated by various LPAs. However, children did not identify any staff being disrespectful or not treating anyone without dignity. Interviews conducted with social worker to one (1) child identified in investigation identified that child did not disclose any issues or concerns with staff or facility. County social worker stated that child expressed wanting to be moved back to hometown and that child did not express any reason why. Documents reviewed documented various behaviors of children and incidents that transpired within the facility. No documents reviewed showed staff treating any child inappropriately or without dignity. Based on information gathered, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation was not met, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report Confidential Names Form, and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility representative. There were no deficiencies cited during this inspection.

Investigation Findings:
13On 10/18/ Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Winston Moroney made unannounced visit to the Daughters project facility on behalf of LPA Dawn Mahecha for the purpose of closing the following complaint investigation. LPA met with representative and discussed the following findings. Investigation consisted of the following: LPAs spoke with and interviewed facility manager (see confidential names, LIC811 dated 10/3/2024). LPA requested the following documents be emailed to LPA Moroney: Current staff/client roster and one child's needs and service plan. LPA Mahecha interviewed four (4) children between 9/17/2024 and 10/3/2024. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Winston Moroney LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 10/18/2024

met_with: Joellen Gutierrez


summary: Complaint Investigation - Substantiated

raw_content:
Narrative:
Based on review of records and e-mails, as well as confidential interviews, it was revealed, that the facility did not meet the reporting requirements for the incident that occurred on 02/22/25 . The incident was not reported to the authorized representative and CCLD until 02/26/25. The second incident, that occurred on 03/15/2025 was reported to CCLD within 24 hr via e-mail, but the final report was not submitted to the Department and authorized representative within 7 days. As a part of investigation, LPA reviewed the SIR folder and was not able to locate the report in the facility folder and requested for the Administrator to e-mail the report to the LPA. The facility had no evidence that the report was emailed to the CCLD within the 7 days from the occurrence. Based on the information collected, the preponderance of evidence has been met, therefore the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED. This violation pose potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to clients in care. The facility is being cited under ILS 87061(b)(4) for Reporting Requirements on the corresponding LIC9099D page. The copy of this report, LIC 9099D and the appeal rights were given and explained to the Administrator.

Investigation Findings:
SubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Estimated Days of Completion: Estimated Days of Completion:


raw_content:
Narrative:
This LPA conducted the investigation of the above allegation(s), and it consisted of but was not limited to a review of records, including the client's needs and service plans, police reports, medical records, SIR's and interviews with 2 of 3 staff members (S1) on 4/4/25, (S3) on 4/18/25. No statements were received from S2 as they are no longer employed at the STRTP, and C2 has declined to provide a statement. Reference Confidential Names Form LIC 811, dated August 29, 2025. The Following Allegation(s) were reported: 1. The staff did not prevent the youth from engaging in a physical altercation. The staff refuted the allegation, asserting that on the day of the alleged incident, three staff members were present who were actively involved and took necessary actions to ensure the safety of all clients. The staff reported that they employed crisis communication techniques and verbally guided clients, reminding them to utilize their coping skills, while also attempting to escort both clients to separate areas of the facility. However, C1 and C2 were able to push past the staff, leading to a physical confrontation between them. The staff stated that they promptly positioned themselves between the clients and worked to separate them, with S1 escorting C1 outside in an effort to de-escalate the situation. Furthermore, the staff mentioned that the Kern County Sheriff's Department was contacted during the incident and subsequently arrived at the facility, where they spoke with both clients and removed them from the STRTP, placing them in the Kern County Youth Detention Center. Confidential statements from C1 and C3 supported the staff's account of the events, confirming that the staff intervened by verbally redirecting and stepping in between the two clients, escorting them to different sections of the facility. C1 and C3 expressed that they feel secure living at the STRTP and acknowledged the staff's involvement in their daily activities. Continued... Additionally, police reports acquired from the Kern County Sheriff's Department indicated that both C1 and C2 participated in a physical confrontation, with both parties regarded as aggressors towards one another. Consequently, they were expelled from the facility and transferred to the Kern County Youth Detention Center without any further incidents. Therefore, based on the information received, the above allegation(s) is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation(s) may have happened are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with the Foster Family Agency. There are no deficiencies to be cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the (LIC 811) was left with the STRTP Program Coordinator.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 4, 2025, at 4: PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Winston Moroney conducted a complaint inspection at the above Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) and met with Elizabeth Sausedo. The inspection aimed to deliver the finding(s) regarding the complaint allegation(s). On March 25, 2025, the Community Care Licensing Division of the California Department of Social Services received a complaint from the Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB) with the following allegation(s): The staff did not prevent the youth from engaging in a physical altercation; The staff did not ensure reporting requirements were followed in a timely manner. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Winston Moroney LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/04/2025

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:


raw_content:
Narrative:
This LPA conducted the investigation of the above allegation(s), and it consisted of but was not limited to a review of records, including the client's needs and service plans, police reports, medical records, SIR's and interviews with 3 of 3 staff members (S1, S2, S3) on 6/6/25, one of three clients (C1) on 7/23/25. No statements were obtained from C2 and C3 as they opted not to take part in the interviews. (Reference Confidential Names Form LIC 811, dated September 4, 2025.) The Following Allegation(s) were reported: 1. The staff did not seek medical attention for the minor. The staff members identified as S1, S2, and S3 collectively denied the allegation concerning the incident in question. They asserted that on the day of the alleged occurrence, all three were present and actively engaged in their professional duties. According to their account, they took appropriate and timely measures to ensure the safety and well-being of client C1 throughout the day. Earlier that morning, staff reported that C1 had participated in a telehealth consultation with a physician. Said appointment was due to C1's symptoms of vomiting, experienced the previous night, coupled with ongoing discomfort upon waking. Following the consultation, S2 noted that the physician diagnosed C1 with a stomach virus and issued a formal doctor's note to document the condition. Staff further stated that no additional health concerns were raised until later that evening, on May 19, 2025. At that time, C1 reported continued stomach discomfort. In response, staff administered over-the-counter medication to alleviate the symptoms and support C1's recovery. On the following day, May 20, 2025, S1 confirmed that C1 was transported to an urgent care facility for further medical evaluation. A physician prescribed medication, after which C1 was discharged and returned to the Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP). S1 explained that the prescribed medication had been ordered and was pending delivery to the facility. However, according to S1, C1 grew increasingly impatient while awaiting the medication. Rather than continuing to wait, C1 independently contacted emergency services using their personal cellphone. This action resulted in paramedics arriving at the facility and subsequently transporting C1 to Kern Medical Center for further evaluation. Continued. 2. The staff are not ensuring that the minor receives behavioral health services. S1 refuted the allegation, stating that the STRTP provides four Clinicians who provide three group sessions a week, and each Clinician meets with all clients once a week for an hour. S1 further disclosed that C1 would often refuse to meet with said Clinicians and decline to participate in group sessions. S1 stated that the facility staff have received trauma-informed care training and understand the importance of providing care to all clients. S1 further stated that C1 has never expressed any concerns to them, that S1 maintained a positive relationship with C1, frequently assisting staff with managing C1's unpredictable behavior and returning C1 to baseline. 3. The staff are not providing a comfortable environment for minor. The staff refuted the allegation, asserting that all staff members provide exceptional care to every child residing in the STRTP, ensuring that their physical, emotional, psychological, and developmental needs are met with compassion, consistency, and professionalism. Staff are trained in trauma-informed practices and work diligently to create a safe, nurturing environment where each child feels valued, heard, and supported. Through individualized care plans, daily routines, and therapeutic engagement, staff foster a sense of stability and belonging. They build trusting relationships with the children, encouraging positive behavior, emotional growth, and resilience. Staff also work closely with social workers, educators, healthcare providers, and families to ensure continuity of care and to advocate for each child's best interests. Above all, the team is committed to empowering children to heal, grow, and thrive-helping them build the confidence and skills they need to navigate life's challenges and envision a hopeful future. Furthermore, the statement obtained from C1 corroborated the staff's account of the events, affirming that support was provided to all clients and that they (C1) felt safe residing at the STRTP. However, on the day they were transported to Kern Medical Emergency Department, they perceived a delay in receiving support and independently contacted paramedics to expedite assistance. Continued.... Therefore, based on the information received, the above allegation(s) is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation(s) may have happened are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with the Foster Family Agency. There are no deficiencies to be cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with the (LIC 811) was left with the STRTP Program Coordinator.

Investigation Findings:
13On September 4, 2025, at 4: PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Winston Moroney conducted a complaint inspection at the above Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) and met with Elizabeth Sausedo. The inspection aimed to deliver the finding(s) regarding the complaint allegation(s). On May 22, 2025, the Community Care Licensing Division of the California Department of Social Services received a complaint from the Centralized Complaint and Information Bureau (CCIB) with the following allegation(s): The staff did not seek medical attention for minor; The staff are not ensuring minor receives behavior health services; and The staff are not providing a comfortable environment for minor. UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: SUPERVISORS NAME: Gustavo Garcia LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Winston Moroney LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of Control Number 32-CR- STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION CCLD Regional Office, CORPORATE CNTR DR. #200A MONTEREY PARK, CA FACILITY NAME: DAUGHTER PROJECT GIRLS HOMEFACILITY NUMBER: VISIT DATE: 09/30/2025

Allegations:
- UnsubstantiatedEstimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

met_with: Elizabeth Gutierrez


summary: Facility Evaluation

raw_content:
Narrative:
On July 10, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) John Bonilla and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Jean Herring conducted an announced Pre-licensing inspection at Valpredo Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93313. LPA and LPM met with Joellen Gutierrez, Administrator. The Short-Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) is a single story facility with an added loft space upstairs located in a residential area surrounded by agricultural fields. The facility consists of 5 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms (including one staff restroom), 2 offices, living room, dining room, kitchen, laundry room, protective separation room, and activity room (upstairs loft). Outside buildings include a garage, currently not in use, and a small uninhabitable unit in the far rear corner of the property. The facility's plan for the small unit is to tear down. Overall, the facility is in good repair. All passageways are unobstructed and all doors open freely. There are no bodies of water in the facility. At the time of visit, the following was observed: Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87072(a)(1) - No personal rights posters observed. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80087(g) - No products stored in facility yet. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80076(a)(19) - Dishwasher did not power on. Stove inoperative due to lack of propane service. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87076(c)(3) - Refrigerator not in place yet. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80073(a) - No telephone service on premises yet. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87077(a)(1) - Laundry room hookups present, no appliances installed yet. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80088(a)(1) - Central air present, not on during this inspection. ... Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80088(e) - Propane service not ready yet. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80088(e)(3) - Bathroom facilities must be cleaned and sanitized. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87088(b)(2) - Shower needs shower curtain. Shower also has long cable hanging from ceiling. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87088(c)(4)(A) - Closets to be covered. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87087.2(a) - Facility has incomplete fencing around perimeter, clients may have access to neighbors barn. Possible health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87087.2(a)(3) - Areas accessible due to incomplete perimeter fencing. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80088(b) - Screens and window sills need to be cleaned and installed. Debris found around windows. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 80087(a) - Facility-wide cleaning necessary before licensure. Many pests including spiders and yellow jackets found in eaves and corners of buildings. 2 uncovered outlets in kitchen. 2 doorknobs in bathroom need to be corrected. Paint job needs to be completed throughout facility. Disaster Preparedness - No Deficiency: 1565(a)(7)(A) - Licensee provided with PIN 21-03 to aid with updating written disaster plan. Facility sketch must include all buildings on property. Corrections were discussed with Joellen Gutierrez. Applicant was advised corrections need to be completed prior to licensure. Another inspection is required to inspect all corrections made. Exit interview conducted. A signed copy of this report, LIC809-C were provided to Joellen Gutierrez.

visit_type: Prelicensing


summary: Facility Evaluation

raw_content:
Narrative:
On August 21, 2024, at 09:15 a.m., Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Gilbert Gutierrez and John Bonilla conducted an announced Pre-licensing inspection at Valpredo Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93313. LPAs met with Joellen Gutierrez, Administrator. During this inspection, LPAs observed the following: · The bedroom windows do not have curtains/blinds. · The beds have no beddings. · The monitor for the video cameras was not yet installed to determine if none of the cameras capture the bedrooms. · The facility has stated that all appliances (refrigerators, freezers, washer/dryer) will be moved from current location upon licensure. Per administrator, everything will be in place by August 30, 2024. An exit interview was conducted and copy of the report provided to the administrator. No deficiency citation issued at the time of the inspection.


summary: Facility Evaluation

raw_content:
Narrative:
On September 3, 2023, at 9: A.M, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gilbert Gutierrez conducted an announced pre-licensing inspection to the new relocation site of Daughter Project Girls Home, a Short Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) facility and met Administrator, Joellen Gutierrez. At around 9: A.M, LPA with Administrator toured the facility. The facility is a one-story home with a loft space upstairs and big yard both in front and in the back. The facility has 5 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms (including one staff restroom), 2 offices for therapists and administrative staff, living room, dining room, kitchen, laundry room, protective separation room (PSR), and activity room (upstairs loft). At the time of visit, the following was observed: In each bedroom are 2 single beds and closet space. The beds have clean beddings with 2 built-in drawers at the bottom. All bedroom windows and bathroom showers have curtains and cleaned. The PSR's doorknob has no locks. Inside the PSR are two electrical outlets and a bean bag. There is a long table on the upstairs loft for clients' activity/study purposes. There are carbon monoxide and smoke detectors and ceiling lights in working order located in bedrooms, hallways, living rooms and kitchen. There were perishable and non-perishable foods in the kitchen cabinets. There is central air and heating providing comfortable temperature inside the facility. All electrical outlets covered. The TV monitor for the video cameras is not yet installed. Within the property premises, there is a detached garage in the back of the facility currently used as storage, and a small uninhabitable unit in the far-left rear corner of the facility property. The licensee's plan is to demolish the unit in the future. There are no bodies of water in the facility. All passageways and walkways are unobstructed .The perimeter fencing is complete separating the uninhabitable unit making it inaccessible to the clients. Overall, the facility is in good repair. Continued to next page... The following will be relocated/posted/installed later. Personal Rights: No Deficiency: H&S 1522.45 - A video camera located in the hallway captures the lower portion of a bedroom. Camera needs to be relocated to the other side of the hallway or removed. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87072(a)(1) - No personal rights posters observed. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87088(b)(2) - A small window in one of the bathrooms needs a curtain cover. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87076(c)(3) - Refrigerator/freezer not in place yet; will be installed when they move. Physical Plant - No Deficiency: 87077(a)(1) - Laundry room hookups present, no appliances installed yet; will be installed when they move. Corrections were discussed with Administrator Gutierrez and licensee will make corrections and inform LPA. A signed copy of this report, LIC809-C were provided to the administrator.