Severe reports

This Department has investigated the complaint allegations that staff has an inappropriate relationship with youth in care, staff did not prevent youth from consuming alcoholic beverages, and staff did not prevent youths from self-harm.

No witnesses reported observing conduct they believed constituted grooming for the purpose of sexual abuse however, confidential interviews showed possible psychological grooming in the context of establishing emotional connections with youth in care leading youth to not follow other staff directions as required by the program rules and policies.

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations); Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(15).

In plain words: { summary: The state received a report that a child was sexually assaulted by another child outside a cottage during an overnight shift due to a lack of supervision. The state found the allegation substantiated. } Our summary of the state's report. The state's own wording follows.

On January 26, 2026, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received an allegation that due to lack of supervision, minors engaged in inappropriate sexual activity while in care. It was reported that while [Child 1] and [Child 2] were residents at Fred Finch Youth Center San Diego, during an overnight shift, [Child 2] convinced [Child 1] to go out of a resident cottage and [Child 1] was taken behind a building, where [Child 2] pushed [Child 1] onto the ground, held [Child 1]'s arms down, and sexually assaulted [Child 1], although [Child 1] allegedly said no. [...] Based on consistent confidential interviews, the allegation that due to lack of supervision, minors engaged in inappropriate sexual activity while in care is SUBSTANTIATED because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 80078(a). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

The allegation of sexual abuse to minor specifically refers to [Staff 1] having an inappropriate relationship with [Child 1]. Confidential interviews, video surveillance, and record review provided consistence evidence of [Staff 1] having an inappropriate relationship with [Child 1] which included massages, inappropriate touching and oral sex. [...] Based on confidential interviews, video surveillance, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, and the allegations of sexual abuse to [Child 1] by [Staff 1] and [Staff 1] provided [Child 1] with a vape pen are substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(C)(16). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in minor engaging in sexual behavior with an adult.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 80078(a).

Confidential statements and an internal investigation determine that staff did not follow program protocol to prevent inappropriate behaviors between minors and resulting in a minor being sexually assaulted.

From the state's report. Substantiated.

Confidential witness informed LPA that on April 19, 2025, while on an outing with [Child 1], [Staff 1] made sexually inappropriate comments.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

In regard to the allegation that staff ([Staff 1]) did not prevent minors ([Child 1], [Child 2]) from engaging in inappropriate CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE behaviors; it was reported that while [Child 1] was in care at the facility, [Child 1] was sexually assaulted (no details provided) by [Child 2] on more than one occasion.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Based on the information that LPA was able to obtain, [Staff 1] did have an inappropriate relationship with [Child 1] by mainitaining contact with him while he was on unauthorized absence from the facility and posing as his mother to try to enroll him in school.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Regarding the allegation that lack of supervision of minors in care led to inappropriate sexual contact, confidential interviews confirmed that due to [Child 1]'s needs they were determined to have a 1:1 staff assigned to them while living at the facility. [...] In addition, records reviewed, and interviews conducted also confirmed that facility did not follow 1:1 supervision protocol and left [Child 1] and [Child 2] unsupervised which resulted in [Child 1] being the victim of inappropriate sexual contact by [Child 2]. Based on confidential interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met and the allegations that facility did not meet the medical needs of minor in care and that lack of supervision of minors in care led to inappropriate sexual contact are substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations). Cited: 87075(c), 80078(a). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

On September 14, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received an allegation that a minor ([Child 1]) was inappropriately touched by staff ([Staff 1]) while in care. [...] Further, additional information indicated that [Staff 1] was detained for inappropriate sexual contact with [Child 1]. Based on confidential interviews and documentation, the allegation that a minor ([Child 1]) was inappropriately touched by staff ([Staff 1]) while in care is substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Corroborating statements found the facility has had issues with youth using drugs and alcohol while in care, including marijuana, vaping and on July 7, 2024, facility reported a medical emergency as youth was reported to have overdosed on fentanyl. [...] On an isolated incident, the youth was allegedly sexually assaulted by another resident while in care.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

In plain words: A report alleged that a staff member sexually abused a client at the facility by kissing him and touching his genitals over his clothing. The state issued a civil penalty to the program based on this finding of sexual abuse. Our summary of the state's report. The state's own wording follows.

On April 16, 2024, the Department received a complaint alleging a Blissful Living Group Home, Inc. (BLGHI) staff ([Staff 1]) (Reference Confidential Names form LIC811 dated 11/4/24) sexually abused a client in care. [...] A client alleged that while at her home, [Staff 1] sexually abused him by kissing him on the lips and fondling his genitals over his clothing. [...] Under Health and Safety Code (HSC) section 1548(f)(1)(F)(2), a violation the Department determines results in sexual abuse as defined in Section 11165.1 of the Penal Code to a child receiving care through a Short Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) there shall be a civil penalty of $2,500. [...] A copy of this report, Confidential Names form LIC811 dated 11/4/24, Appeal Rights and form LIC 421D(CRP) for a Civil Penalty Assessment - Death / Serious Bodily Injury / Physical Abuse were given to the facility representative.

From the state's report. Deficiency cited at inspection. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Page The Department received a complaint alleging staff ([Staff 1]) hosted minors at her home, fondled a client's ([Child 1]) genitals and kissed [Child 1] mouth to mouth in her bedroom.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(1). The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

The investigation revealed, reported allegations of Youth #1 being inappropriately touched by former staff member ([Staff 1]) was previously investigated by the San Luis Obispo Police Department in February 2020 and the matter was closed. In September of 2020, the same allegation of being inappropriately touched by [Staff 1] was investigated by CCL Investigator Mariana Lomeli and substantiated regarding [Staff 1] sexually abusing minors in care.

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations). The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

LPA was unable to interview client 2 due to aging out of foster care and whereabouts unknown. On March 13, 2023, the Department received a complaint that alleged a facility staff has engaged in inappropriate relationships with residents and facility staff has spoken inappropriately to residents. [...] Regarding the allegation that [Staff 2] has engaged in an inappropriate relationship with [Child 1], confidential interviews confirmed [Staff 2] brought [Child 1] to their residence for a home cooked meal but documented a mall trip in the client file. [...] Based on confidential interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, and the allegation that [Staff 2] has engaged in an inappropriate relationship with [Child 1] and [Staff 2] has spoken inappropriately to [Child 1] is supported and proven by evidence, therefore the allegations are substantiated at this time.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Specifically, it was reported on September 7, 2023, [Child 1], Child #2 and Child #3 were left alone upstairs in the facility at which time [Child 1] was sexually abused.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

One staff absconded from the facility with a minor in care, across state lines. [...] Other behaviors were reported that corroborate an inappropriate relationship between the staff and client at the facility. continued on 9099-C page Based on IB findings, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations, staff had inappropriate interactions with client in care and staff absconded with client across state lines are SUBSTANTIATED, Facility is cited per Health and Safety code 1558 (a)(2) Conduct Inimical.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

Based on confidential interviews and record reviews, the allegation of sexual abuse had maintained consistent through multiple interviews. [...] The allegations were also investigated by the Alameda County Sheriff's Office. [...] Based on the confidential interviews and record review, the allegation that staff sexually abused a youth in care has met the preponderance of doubt and is therefore substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

During the investigation of staff had inappropriate relationship with youth, LPA toured the facility with LaKeisha Carter, Director on 8/29/23 and with Kim Robinson Assistant Director on 9/13/23. [...] LPA's Jean Stidman and Stephannie Verna conducted interviews with the reporting party, two staff, one resource parent and three clients on 8/29/23, 9/13/23, 9/14/23 and 11/9/23.Two out of two youth interviewed reported the staff had an inappropriate relationship with youth.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 84072(d)(10). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

The referral reported staff ([Staff 1]) allegedly raped a former client, who is now an adult (A1).

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(15). The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

According to SIA Birk's report, based on confidential interviews and documentation there were multiple consistent statements of multiple clients being sexually assaulted and/or inappropriately touched while at the facility.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 84072(d)(10).

On June 16, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received two allegations alleging Staff ([Staff 1]) sexually abused a minor ([Child 1]) in care and staff ([Staff 1]) bribed minor ([Child 1]). Specifically, it was reported when [Child 1] resided at the facility, [Staff 1] propositioned [Child 1] for sexual activities in exchange for items including drugs, candy, and things unavailable at the facility. Consistent confidential interviews and record review provided a preponderance of evidence of [Child 1] being sexually abused by [Staff 1] by [Staff 1] bribing [Child 1] to participate in sexual activities. Based on record review and confidential interviews the allegations alleging Staff ([Staff 1]) sexually abused a minor ([Child 1]) in care and staff ([Staff 1]) bribed minor are substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

According to SIA Birk's report, based on confidential interviews and documentation there were multiple consistent statements of multiple clients being sexually assaulted and/or inappropriately touched while at the facility.

From the state's report. Substantiated.

The following report was discussed: This Department investigated an allegation that Staff inappropriately touched youth in care.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(11).

On 04/04/2022, the San Jose Children's Residential Program Regional Office received a complaint for Newport Academy Paloma with three allegations: (1) Staff do not provide a safe and healthful environment for residents in care; (2) Inappropriate touching by one residents toward residents; and (3) Inappropriate sexual language used by one resident toward residents.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 84072(d)(11), 80078(a).

On 06/02/22, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging client #1 is sexually abusing other clients. [...] The allegation [Child 1] is sexually abusing other clients is substantiated at this time.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 80078(a). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Confidential interviews reported that [Staff 1] admitted using the word prostitution towards [Child 1] instead of the trauma inform approach Commercial Sexual Exploitation Children (CSEC) during a meeting with County Social Worker.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 84072(d)(10). The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Based on confidential interviews by (IB), ([Staff 1]) (see LIC 811 confidential names dated 9-27-22) sexually assaulted ([Child 3]) on three separate occasions, that occurred in a location outside of the facility. Based on the information obtained, there is a preponderance of the evidence to prove that staff had a sexual relationship with a foster child.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

One staff ([Staff 2]) witnessed another staff ([Staff 1]) inappropriately touch a youth in care on two occasions between May and June 2022. [...] Additional interviews corroborated [Staff 1] exhibited inappropriate sexualized behavior toward staff at the facility and at facilities where [Staff 1] was previously employed.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(11). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

On May 17, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received an allegation lack of supervision resulted in foster child (Child #1) being sexually abused. [...] Confidential interviews provided consistent statements of sexual acts taking place in the resident's rooms at night when staff were busy performing other duties. [...] Based on confidential interviews and record review the allegation lack of supervision resulted in foster child (Child #1) being sexually abused is substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 80078(a). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Three clients reported a staff member solicited nude photos from one client who was Absent Without Leave (AWOL) from the facility. [...] In addition to soliciting nude photos, the clients reported the staff member allowed the clients to use the staff member's cell phone to access social media, which went against facility policy. The staff member also visited a client while the client was AWOL, brought the client food, and took the client to the staff member's home.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations, staff engaged in sexual interactions with client in care and staff made several inappropriate comments to client in care are found to be SUBSTANTIATED.

From the state's report. Substantiated.

On December 8, 2021, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging neglect/lack of supervision as Youth #1 was reportedly sexually assaulted by another youth resident while in care (see LIC811, dated October 11, 2022). [...] On October 28, 2020, LAPD responded to Adolescent Growth, Inc. concerning an alleged sexual assault between [Youth 1] and Youth #2 reportedly occurring on October 27, 2020, for which [Youth 2] was subsequently arrested.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

During investigation, confidential interviews, police reports, and physical evidence were obtained, it was determined that a staff sexually abused client in care. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation, Staff sexually abused client in care is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 84072(d)(11).

In plain words: A staff member sexually abused a child in the facility on May 12, 2022. The state investigation concluded the allegation was substantiated and cited the facility for violating the child's personal rights. Our summary of the state's report. The state's own wording follows.

The allegation that staff sexually abused a minor while in care is related to an incident that took place at the facility on 5/12/2022 involving [Staff 1] and [Child 1] (see LIC811 dated 8/26/22). [...] Based on information obtained and interviews conducted by the Investigations Branch, the allegation that a staff sexually abused a minor while in care is SUBSTANTIATED meaning the "preponderance of the evidence" standard has been met. The facility is being cited for Personal Rights section 87072(c)(11) as the licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the personal rights specified in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 16001.9, including the right to be free of physical, sexual, emotional, or other abuse as it pertains to [Staff 1] engaging in a sexual relationship with a client while in the facility.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(11). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Specifically, it was reported [Staff 1] made inappropriate sexual comments to [Child 1] on at least two occasions.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Investigator Barajas conducted the investigation in conjunction with El Dorado County Sheriff Department. Investigation with the Department showed that [Staff 1] (see LIC811 dated 7/15/22) and [Child 1] engaged in a sexual relationship, including oral sex and sexual intercourse, while [Child 1] was residing in the facility and continued after [Child 1] left the program. The sexual relationship began while [Child 1] was under the age of 18. Investigator Barajas and El Dorado County Sheriff also conducted additional interviews with two additional clients of the facility ([Child 2] and [Child 3]) who disclosed that they exchanged nude photos with [Staff 1] and that [Staff 1] made sexually explicit statements to them, including wanting to meet up with the youth and have sexual relations with the youth.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(c)(11). The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

On 02/24/2022, the Department received an allegation that a minor was sexually abused while in care. It was reported that staff #1 walked client #1 to the shower and raped [Child 1]. [...] Confidential interviews stated [Staff 1] had sexual intercourse with [Child 1] and charges will be filed against [Staff 1]. Based on confidential interviews, the allegation that [Child 1] was sexually abused while in care is substantiated.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Records revealed that [Staff 2] was terminated for allowing [Child 1] to use [Staff 2]'s work phone on more than one occasion resulting in [Child 1] engaging in an inappropriate relationship with an adult male.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

[Staff 1]'s inappropriate behavior escalated and at some point [Staff 1] began engaging in sexual acts having sexual intercourse with [Child 1] while at the program. [...] The Department has determined substantiated finding for sexual abuse by [Staff 1] on [Child 1].

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

In plain words: The state investigated and found it true that a resource parent had an inappropriate relationship with a youth in care, putting the safety and health of clients at risk. Our summary of the state's report. The state's own wording follows.

As a result of the interviews conducted, documentation reviewed and investigation conducted, the allegation that resource parent had an inappropriate relationship with client in care and resource parent engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of clients in the facility are SUBSTANTIATED at this time meaning that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations). Cited: 84072(d).

The sexual activity was discovered by another facility client who reported it to the staff. [...] Confidential statements obtained from one of the facility clients indicated that the sexual abuse occurred, and he screamed for help during the incident but the staff was not in the immediate vicinity according to the client.

The investigation revealed that two facility clients became involved in sexual activities on two occasions during the month of June 2021 while unsupervised behind facility buildings.

(CONTINUED) It was alleged that a facility client was sexually abused by another client at the facility due to neglect and lack of supervision. [...] The incidents became known when the client who was sexually abused informed another client who then reported to staff.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

On June 14, 2021, CCL received an allegation that Client #1 (see LIC811, dated 12/16/2021) was sexually assaulted by Client #2 while in care. [...] Local law enforcement was contacted by the facility.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

In plain words: The state investigated an allegation that a staff member had an inappropriate relationship with a child in the program. The state substantiated the claim, finding it valid based on the evidence. Our summary of the state's report. The state's own wording follows.

As a result of the interviews conducted, documentation reviewed and investigation conducted, the allegation that staff had an inappropriate relationship with client in care and staff engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of clients in the facility are SUBSTANTIATED at this time meaning that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations). Cited: 84072(d).

In plain words: A staff member sexually abused a client multiple times during one‑on‑one walks on facility grounds, and the state gave the facility a report and civil‑penalty forms. Our summary of the state's report. The state's own wording follows.

LPA Yamamoto met with the facility representative named above and discussed the following: On 3/4/21, the Department received a complaint that staff sexually abused client in care and engaged in conduct inimical to clients in care. Confidential statements obtained during the investigation revealed that the sexual abuse occurred multiple times on facility grounds when client and staff went for one on one walks. [...] Per Health and Safety Code section 1548(2), "physical abuse" includes sexual abuse as defined by Penal Code section 11165.1 which includes Section 288a oral copulation. [...] A copy of this signed report, Confidential Names Form (LIC 811), Appeal Rights and Form LIC 421-D (CRP) Civil Penalty Assessment - Death / Serious Bodily Injury / Physical Abuse were provided to the facility representative.

From the state's report. Deficiency cited at inspection. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

The allegation that staff sexually abused a foster child is related to a disclosure made on 6/30/21, by [Child 1] (see LIC811 dated DATE) that [Child 1] had engaged in sexual intercourse with [Staff 1] in the staff room at the facility. [...] As a result of the investigation and interviews conducted, the allegations that staff sexually abused a foster child and that staff gave a foster child non-prescribed medication for illicit use are SUBSTANTIATED at this time meaning that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. [...] The facility has a responsibility to accord personal rights to all children in care including the right to be free of physical, sexual, emotional, or other abuse... investigation showed that [Staff 1] sexually abuse [Child 1] in the facility.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(d)(11). "[...]" marks text left out between sentences. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

On 10/5/21 at 12: PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robin Sullivan went to the facility and met with Devin Johnson, Supervisor, to deliver findings for the allegations that staff inappropriately touched minor, staff made sexual advances towards minor, and facility did not notify licensing of an incident. [...] Based on the interviews conducted and incident reports reviewed the allegations that staff inappropriately touched minor, staff made sexual advances towards minor, and the facility did not notify licensing of an incident are SUBSTANTIATED.

From the state's report. Substantiated. "[...]" marks text left out between sentences.

On May 17, 2021, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging Staff Member #1 provided alcohol to minors and [Staff 1] exposed minor to CSEC (Commercial Sexually Exploited Children) activity.

From the state's report. Substantiated. The state numbers or abbreviates the people in a report instead of naming them; we spell its codes out in square brackets, such as [Staff 1] for S1 or [Former client 3] for FC #3.

Staff allowed client to reside with staff and engaged in continued sexual abuse of client, when client went AWOL.

From the state's report. Substantiated (one of several allegations). Cited: 87072(d)(11).

The complaint allegation, lack of supervision resulting in minor being sexually abused by an adult while in care, is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.

From the state's report. Substantiated. Cited: 87072(d)(11).