Facility profile California
Koinonia BHP
A program of 3 licensed homes
Koinonia BHP is a program in California.
Homes
The state licenses this program home by home: 3 on record, 3 open, with 44 inspection reports between them. Each has its own page with its licence and reports; their news, lawsuits and serious findings are gathered here too.
Licensing and inspections
- Licensed as
- KOINONIA BHP - AUBURN; KOINONIA BHP - LOOMIS; KOINONIA BHP - ROCKLIN
- License category
- Group Home
- Executive director
- PATRICIA AMBRIZ
- Licensed capacity
- 6
58 inspection reports on file. Search all California reports
The newest 25 reports, by date: 6 findings in 6 reports
- Jul 10, 2026 Facility Evaluation
- Apr 23, 2025 Facility Evaluation
- Feb 21, 2025 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated
- Feb 21, 2025 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated
- Feb 21, 2025 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated
- Dec 19, 2024 Facility Evaluation
- Dec 19, 2024 Facility Evaluation
-
Aug 28, 2024
Complaint Investigation - Substantiated
1 finding
-
Substantiated : 84072(d)(19)
On 8/28/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Luman-Gonzalez conducted an unannounced visit to the above agency to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation. LPA met with Juan Magallon, Facility Administrator and was granted entry. During the investigation, LPAs Farhaan Sarangi and Sara Luman-Gonzalez conducted the 10 day inspection of the facility on 1/29/2024, no deficiencies were cited at that time. LPA obtained Needs and Services Plans, Case Notes from October 2024 to January 2024, Incident Reports for all clients from October 2024 to January 2024, Staff Roster for both December and January, and Client Roster for December and January. IB Investigator Sergio Guerra conducted 12 confidential interviews between December 2023 and August 2024. Based on the forensic interview conducted on 1/30/2024, C1 was consistent with the timeline of events. Even though C2 denied the allegation, C3 and C4 confirmed that C1 was victimized by C2. It was reported during the interview process that C1 did not have a history of lying. Staff confirmed that clients were not being monitored every fifteen minutes during the night, and the facility was not able to provide video footage to prove that the room checks were consistently completed throughout the night. Lastly, Staff reported that C2 has a history of inappropriate behavior. Based on LPA observation and interviews which were conducted and records review, Preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above ...
-
-
Aug 28, 2024
Complaint Investigation - Substantiated
1 finding
-
Substantiated : 84072(d)(19)
On 8/28/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Luman-Gonzalez conducted an unannounced visit to the above agency to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation. LPA met with Juan Magallon, Facility Administrator and was granted entry. During the investigation, LPAs Farhaan Sarangi and Sara Luman-Gonzalez conducted the 10 day inspection of the facility on 1/29/2024, no deficiencies were cited at that time. LPA obtained Needs and Services Plans, Case Notes from October 2024 to January 2024, Incident Reports for all clients from October 2024 to January 2024, Staff Roster for both December and January, and Client Roster for December and January. IB Investigator Sergio Guerra conducted 12 confidential interviews between December 2023 and August 2024. Based on the forensic interview conducted on 1/30/2024, C1 was consistent with the timeline of events. Even though C2 denied the allegation, C3 and C4 confirmed that C1 was victimized by C2. It was reported during the interview process that C1 did not have a history of lying. Staff confirmed that clients were not being monitored every fifteen minutes during the night, and the facility was not able to provide video footage to prove that the room checks were consistently completed throughout the night. Lastly, Staff reported that C2 has a history of inappropriate behavior. Based on LPA observation and interviews which were conducted and records review, Preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above ...
-
- Aug 1, 2024 Facility Evaluation
- Jul 18, 2024 Facility Evaluation
- May 6, 2024 Facility Evaluation
- Apr 11, 2024 Facility Evaluation
-
Mar 11, 2024
Complaint Investigation - Substantiated - 1 allegation
1 finding
-
Substantiated
On March 11, 2024 at approximately 10: A.M. Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sara Luman-Gonzalez, Tatyana Shulz, and Jacqueline Carmona arrived unannounced at Kononia BHP-Rocklin and met with Linda Wagner,Facility Administrator for the purpose of delivering findings. During the investigation, LPA reviewed the facility's file at the licensing office, including the complaint history, criminal background check, and incident reports. LPA also reviewed the Needs and Services Plans, Case Notes, Staff Roster, and Video Footage from the night of the incident. LPA conducted 10 confidential interviews during the investigation process. Based on the interviews conducted, the allegation above is being substantiated because LPA received consistent statements regarding how one youth entered another youth's room without staff knowledge twice between 4:45am - 5:00am on 01/19/2024. Furthermore, LPA reviewed video footage which confirmed one of the youths going in and out of the other youth's bedroom that morning. Based on LPA's observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met, there for the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 1, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and Appeals Rights were given to Linda Wagner.
-
-
Mar 11, 2024
Complaint Investigation - Substantiated - 1 allegation
1 finding
-
Substantiated
On March 11, 2024 at approximately 10: A.M. Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sara Luman-Gonzalez, Tatyana Shulz, and Jacqueline Carmona arrived unannounced at Kononia BHP-Rocklin and met with Linda Wagner,Facility Administrator for the purpose of delivering findings. During the investigation, LPA reviewed the facility's file at the licensing office, including the complaint history, criminal background check, and incident reports. LPA also reviewed the Needs and Services Plans, Case Notes, Staff Roster, and Video Footage from the night of the incident. LPA conducted 10 confidential interviews during the investigation process. Based on the interviews conducted, the allegation above is being substantiated because LPA received consistent statements regarding how one youth entered another youth's room without staff knowledge twice between 4:45am - 5:00am on 01/19/2024. Furthermore, LPA reviewed video footage which confirmed one of the youths going in and out of the other youth's bedroom that morning. Based on LPA's observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met, there for the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 1, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and Appeals Rights were given to Linda Wagner.
-
-
Jan 29, 2024
Facility Evaluation
1 finding
-
Deficiency cited at inspection
On this day January 29, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sara Luman-Gonzalez and Farhaan Sarangi conducted a Case Management-Other inspection. LPAs met with Facility Administrator, Jordan Myers and was granted access into the facility. During the Case Management-Other inspection, LPAs observed that the pool fence did not have a lock on it. LPAs educated the Administrator regarding the importance of having locks on the pool (See LIC 9102-Technical Violation). No deficiencies were cited during today's Case Management-Other inspection. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.
-
-
Jan 29, 2024
Facility Evaluation
1 finding
-
Deficiency cited at inspection
On this day January 29, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sara Luman-Gonzalez and Farhaan Sarangi conducted a Case Management-Other inspection. LPAs met with Facility Administrator, Jordan Myers and was granted access into the facility. During the Case Management-Other inspection, LPAs observed that the pool fence did not have a lock on it. LPAs educated the Administrator regarding the importance of having locks on the pool (See LIC 9102-Technical Violation). No deficiencies were cited during today's Case Management-Other inspection. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.
-
- Jan 22, 2024 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated - 1 allegation
- Jan 22, 2024 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated - 1 allegation
- Dec 26, 2023 Facility Evaluation - 1 deficiency
- Oct 11, 2023 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated
- Oct 11, 2023 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated
- Aug 1, 2023 Facility Evaluation
- Jul 18, 2023 Complaint Investigation - Unsubstantiated
- Jul 18, 2023 Facility Evaluation
