Birth of the TTI

How six threads, the juvenile court, institutions for disabled children, Guided Group Interaction and Synanon, Lester Roloff's homes, wilderness camps, and drug-war money, met between 1900 and 1980 to build the Troubled Teen Industry.

The California State Reform School at Whittier around 1910

Unknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Contents
  1. Who got sent away: the juvenile court
  2. Who was called unfit: disability institutions and behaviorism
  3. How it was done: from the Oxford Group to the Synanon Game
  4. Who answered to no one: the fundamentalist homes
  5. Where it was done: camps and the wilderness
  6. Who paid for it: the war on drugs
  7. Where the threads cross
  8. The six timelines
  9. Keep reading

Between 1900 and 1980, six separate stories ran side by side and then ran into each other: the juvenile court and the reform school, the institution for disabled children, the fundamentalist Christian home, the therapeutic camp, the experimental encounter group, and the war on drugs. None of them set out to build an industry. By the late 1970s they had built one anyway. This page explains how the threads met. The six timelines at the bottom follow each one in detail.

Who got sent away: the juvenile court #

The first juvenile court opened in Chicago in 1899. It was a reform: children would no longer be tried as adults. But the court also gave the state a new power to remove children who had committed no crime at all, only “delinquency,” a word that could cover running away, skipping school, or defying a parent. In 1930 the White House Conference on Child Health and Protection declared that delinquent acts were symptoms of deeper psychological problems rather than simple lawbreaking. From then on, a troublesome child was a child who needed treatment, and treatment could last as long as the experts said it should.

Reform schools such as the Dozier School for Boys in Florida (1900) and the cottage-style institutions of the 1940s and 1950s gave that treatment a home. Abuse reports were already prompting calls to close training schools by 1950. When the Supreme Court gave children in juvenile court the right to a lawyer in In re Gault (1967), private placements arranged by parents stayed outside those protections. That gap is where much of the later industry would live.

Who was called unfit: disability institutions and behaviorism #

A second line of institutions held children who were labelled “feebleminded.” At the Vineland Training School in New Jersey, Henry Goddard brought the Binet IQ test to the United States in 1908 and used it to argue that feeblemindedness was hereditary. Indiana passed the first sterilization law in 1907, more than fifteen states followed by 1917, and in Buck v. Bell (1927) the Supreme Court upheld the sterilization of Carrie Buck, a teenager held at the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded. Private schools grew up alongside the state colonies: Helena Devereux opened hers in Pennsylvania in 1912, and it became one of the largest behavioral health providers in the country.

After the Community Mental Health Act (1963) and Medicaid (1965), public money could follow a child into a private residential placement. In the same years behaviorism gave those placements a method. Ivar Lovaas used electric shocks, slaps, and shouting on autistic children at UCLA and published the results in 1965; Applied Behavior Analysis was named and defined in 1968; and in 1971 Matthew Israel founded the Behavior Research Institute, now the Judge Rotenberg Center, which still uses electric shock on its residents. Point systems, levels, and punishment for “noncompliance” ran in both directions between these programs and the ones built for troubled teens.

How it was done: from the Oxford Group to the Synanon Game #

Most of the TTI’s signature methods, from public confession and peer enforcement to phase systems and “attack therapy,” come down a single family tree.

  • The Oxford Group. Frank Buchman’s movement, formalized in the 1920s, reformed people through small-group confession, surrender, and moral inventory. Bill Wilson got sober with the Oxford Group in 1934 and founded Alcoholics Anonymous on its model in 1935.
  • Guided Group Interaction. At Fort Knox in 1946, sociologist Lloyd McCorkle turned a method for retraining soldiers who would not follow orders into Guided Group Interaction (GGI), in which the members of a group enforce the rules on each other. McCorkle brought it to delinquent boys at Highfields in New Jersey. Judge Monroe Paxman’s Pinehills Center (the Provo Experiment, 1956) added a phase system where boys voted on whether their peers could move up, and shunned those who resisted. Harry Vorrath, who interned at Highfields, later spread GGI as Positive Peer Culture to juvenile programs in at least 20 states.
  • Synanon. Chuck Dederich, an AA member, took part in a federally funded LSD study in 1957 and came out of it with his own program, renamed Synanon in 1958. Members were encouraged to confront and insult each other in what became the Synanon Game. Daytop Village (1964, built with a $390,000 NIMH grant), Phoenix House (1967), The Seed (1967), and CEDU (1967, founded by Synanon member Mel Wasserman) all copied it. The Seed aimed the method squarely at teenagers, and Straight, Inc. (1976) was built on The Seed.
  • Encounter groups and seminars. Alongside Synanon, the human potential movement (NTL’s T-groups, Carl Rogers’s encounter groups, Esalen) produced the large-group awareness trainings of the 1960s and 1970s: Leadership Dynamics Institute, Mind Dynamics, est, and Lifespring. Their techniques reappeared decades later as the “seminars” sold to parents by CEDU and WWASP programs.

Who answered to no one: the fundamentalist homes #

After losing public influence in the 1920s, fundamentalists built their own schools, radio stations, and churches, and kept the outside world out. Radio preacher Lester Roloff opened the Lighthouse for Boys in 1958, on a part of Padre Island reachable only by boat or plane, then the Anchor Home for Boys and the Rebekah Home for Girls in 1967. Their program was Bible study, prayer, forced labor, and beatings, and Roloff openly rejected psychology.

Roloff’s lasting contribution was legal rather than religious: the argument that a church-run home is ministry and the state has no right to license or inspect it. Texas fought him through the 1970s. In 1979 he moved the homes under a church, and in 1985 the church moved about a hundred children to Missouri to escape Texas licensing. Staff who passed through Rebekah Home went on to open their own homes, such as Bethel Baptist Home in Mississippi (1978), and the religious exemptions he fought for still protect church-run facilities today.

Where it was done: camps and the wilderness #

Therapeutic camping began as a gentle idea: fresh air and outdoor living for children in institutions. The Dallas Salesmanship Club camp opened in 1946, Kurt Hahn had founded Outward Bound in the UK in 1941, and Campbell Loughmiller’s Wilderness Road (1965) set out the principles. The harsher version came from Utah. In 1967 Larry Olsen led twelve boys on the first BYU survival trek, which became the university course BYU 480. VisionQuest (1973) brought confrontational “impact” tactics to the trail, and Olsen and Larry Wells founded SUWS in 1981 with primitive survival as the treatment itself. Three Springs (1985), modelled on the Salesmanship Club camp, carried the camp model into the corporate era.

Who paid for it: the war on drugs #

Drug policy supplied both the fear and the money. The federal narcotic farms of the 1930s established the idea that addiction could be treated by confinement. The Community Mental Health Centers Act (1963) put addiction under the heading of mental illness, and the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act (1966) let drug charges be dropped for people who completed treatment. In 1968 Congress created the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA), which sent federal money to juvenile reform programs and alternative correctional facilities; along with NIMH, HEW, and the Ford Foundation, it funded programs built on the Highfields and Synanon models, including some of the earliest TTI programs. The Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1973 pushed more federal money toward behavior modification.

As Nixon’s drug war gave way to Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No” (1982) and the Toughlove movement (1984), the target shifted from adults with addictions to middle-class teenagers whose parents feared they might become them. A Synanon-style program for teens no longer needed a court order. It needed a frightened parent and a check.

Where the threads cross #

The dates below are the points where two or more threads meet. Each is covered in full on the timelines.

The six timelines #

  • Juvenile justice
    Workhouses, houses of refuge, and reform schools; the first juvenile court; boot camps, “superpredators,” and the private operators who took over youth detention.
  • Developmental disabilities, segregation, and eugenics
    Phrenology, IQ testing, forced sterilization, and the institutions built to hold children labelled “feebleminded,” through to aversive behaviorism and the Judge Rotenberg Center.
  • Fundamentalist Christian homes
    From the Great Awakenings to Lester Roloff’s Rebekah Home, Bethel Baptist, and the religious exemptions that still shield church-run facilities from licensing.
  • Wilderness therapy
    Summer camps and Outward Bound, BYU’s survival course, the Challenger Foundation, and the deaths that followed the industry into the 2020s.
  • Experimental group psychology and therapeutic communities
    The Oxford Group, guided group interaction, encounter groups, Synanon and its offshoots, and the large-group awareness trainings that WWASP turned into “seminars.”
  • Temperance and the war on drugs
    Temperance societies, Alcoholics Anonymous, the federal narcotic farms, Nixon’s drug war, and the “Just Say No” era that sent teenagers to Straight, Inc.

Keep reading #

For the same story told as a narrative, read How the modern TTI took shape, 1919 to 1969. For what came before, see child control before the modern TTI. For what came after, see corporatization and survivors and families fighting back. The network map shows the people who moved between these programs.