Brooke Parker v. Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc., et al.
In progress
FederalU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma4:26-cv-00526-MTSFiled Aug 25, 2026
Plaintiff:
Brooke Parker
Defendants:
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc. d/b/a New Lifehouse Girls Academy, John Doe Entities 1-10
TVPRA trafficking and forced laborInvoluntary servitudeAttempt and conspiracyCivil remedy for child victims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255New Lifehouse Girls Academy
Brooke Parker's August 2026 complaint alleges that New Lifehouse Girls Academy and related defendants abused, neglected, and exploited her while she was a minor resident, including by coercing unpaid labor. The complaint asserts federal forced-labor and trafficking claims. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: The summons has been returned executed and the plaintiff has filed a disclosure statement as proceedings move forward. On October 2, 2026, an amended complaint was filed.
Bence v. Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc.
Unknown
FederalU.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma4:26-cv-00440Filed Jul 15, 2026
Plaintiff:
Lauren Bence
Defendants:
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc., John Doe
Personal injuryNew Lifehouse Girls Academy
Lauren Bence filed a personal injury lawsuit against Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc., doing business as New Lifehouse Girls Academy, and John Doe in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. The defendant appeared in the action, filed an answer, and submitted a motion to strike specific paragraphs from the complaint. The court subsequently held a scheduling conference and entered a scheduling order as the litigation proceeded.
Lauren Bence v. Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc., et al.
In progress
FederalU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma4:26-cv-00440-MTSFiled Jul 15, 2026
Plaintiff:
Lauren Bence
Defendants:
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc. d/b/a New Lifehouse Girls Academy, Other named and Doe defendants
TVPRA trafficking and forced laborInvoluntary servitudeAttempt and conspiracyCivil remedy for child victims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255New Lifehouse Girls Academy
Lauren Bence's July 2026 complaint alleges that New Lifehouse Girls Academy and related defendants abused, neglected, and exploited her while she was a minor resident, including by coercing unpaid labor. The complaint asserts federal forced-labor and trafficking claims. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: A court order was entered directing the parties to file a Joint Status Report on or before September 29, 2026. On October 2, 2026, an Amended Complaint was filed. On October 14, 2026, a Scheduling Order was entered setting the trial for April 3, 2028.
Second family v. Provo Canyon School (2026, medical malpractice)
Filed
UtahFiled Jun 15, 2026
Plaintiff:
Family of a teenage resident (name withheld in coverage)
Defendants:
Provo Canyon School, Universal Health Services
The second of two family lawsuits filed in June 2026, alleging the school failed to provide adequate medical care to a teenager, resulting in serious injury and health complications.
A mother alleges staff ignored her son's warnings that he was not safe before he was attacked at the facility and suffered a jaw injury and brain bleed, and that medical care was delayed. Utah licensers sanctioned the school over the same incident in June 2026. Paris Hilton publicly supported the family and called for the school's closure.
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division2:26-cv-00503-JNP-DBPFiled May 28, 2026
Plaintiffs:
Landen Giovanni Liparote, Susan Damato, Landen
Defendants:
Discovery Ranch, Inc., Discovery Ranch for Boys, LLC, Discovery Ranch for Boys Real Estate, LLC +5 more
Sexual abuseForced laborNeglectFraudBreach of contractDiscovery Ranch for BoysDiscovery RanchSouth House
Plaintiff Landen Giovanni Liparote alleges that during a three‑month placement at Discovery Ranch for Boys in Utah, he experienced repeated sexual assaults, forced unpaid labor, food deprivation, and other mistreatment. The defendants, including the facility operators and a therapist, are accused of negligence, fraud, and violations of federal trafficking statutes. The complaint seeks compensation for psychological injury and other damages resulting from the alleged conduct.
Outcome: The court dismissed the case on August 4, 2026.
Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al.
Ruling issued
MaineUnited States District Court for the District of Maine2:26-cv-00256-LEWFiled May 15, 2026
Plaintiffs:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 +6 more
Defendants:
Maine Department of Corrections, Martin Magnusson, Mary Ann Saar +56 more
Discrimination Against Qualified Individual with Disabilities in Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. § 794)42 U.S.C. § 1983 - Supervisory Liability in Violation of the Fourteenth and Eighth Amendments5 M.R.S. § 4682(1-A) - Supervisory Liability in Violation of Article I, §§ 1, 5, 6, 6-A, and 9 of the Maine Constitution42 U.S.C. § 1983 - Deliberate Indifference to Substantial Risks of Serious Harm (Fourteenth and Eighth Amendments)42 U.S.C. § 1983 - Use of Unreasonable and Excessive Isolation (Fourteenth and Eighth Amendments)Maine Youth Center (Long Creek Youth Development Center)Old Intensive Care Unit (old ICU)New Intensive Care Unit (new ICU)Special Treatment Unit (STU)Female Security Program (FSP) / Hayden Building+19 more
A civil rights lawsuit brought by nine former residents (Jane Doe 1 and John Does 1-8) of the Maine Youth Center against the Maine Department of Corrections and various facility officials and staff. The plaintiffs allege severe physical, psychological, and sexual abuse, unreasonable and excessive use of solitary confinement and physical restraints, and deliberate indifference to their serious medical and mental health needs during their confinement in the 1990s and early 2000s.
Outcome: Attorney Beals was granted permission to withdraw as counsel.
Multiple plaintiffs filed a civil lawsuit against Indiana Teen Challenge, Inc. and associated leadership alleging various grievances related to their time at the residential facility. The case involves multiple amended complaints and defense filings regarding operations at the youth program. The litigation remains active in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey2:26-cv-03710Filed Apr 8, 2026
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendants:
The Devereux Foundation d/b/a Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, The Helena Devereux Foundation, Devereux Properties, Inc. +3 more
Devereux-Deerhaven
A former resident, filing under a pseudonym, brought a personal-injury suit against Devereux and related entities, including its Deerhaven school for girls. The case settled before the defendants answered and was dismissed with prejudice.
Outcome: Notice of settlement filed Jun 25, 2026; dismissed with prejudice Aug 25, 2026.
Doe, K.H. and Doe, M.H. v. Kansas City Girls Academy, et al.
In progress
FederalU.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Kansas City Division4:25-cv-00989-DGKFiled Dec 23, 2025
Plaintiffs:
Jane Doe, K.H., June Doe, M.H.
Defendants:
Kansas City Girls Academy, John Doe Entities 1-10
TVPRA forced-labor and trafficking claimsNegligenceBreach of fiduciary dutyAbuse and exploitation allegationsKansas City Girls Academy
Two former residents sued Kansas City Girls Academy and unidentified entities. Their December 2025 complaint alleges that, as minors at the faith-based program, they were abused, exploited, and compelled to perform unpaid labor. The complaint seeks damages and alleges federal trafficking violations and state-law claims. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: Court allowed plaintiffs to proceed under pseudonyms Jun 3, 2026.
Jane Doe S.P. v. Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, et al.
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey1:26-cv-00056-KMW-AMDFiled Dec 1, 2025
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe S.P.
Defendants:
Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health New Jersey, The Devereux Foundation +2 more
NegligenceNegligent supervisionNegligent hiring and retentionGross negligenceNegligent infliction of emotional distressDevereux Deerhaven School for Troubled GirlsDevereux New Jersey programs
Jane Doe S.P. alleges that she experienced sexual abuse as a minor while in the care of Devereux-affiliated programs and brings claims against Devereux entities and related defendants. The complaint was filed in New Jersey state court on December 1, 2025 and was included in a federal filing on January 5, 2026. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: Removed from Camden County Superior Court Jan 5, 2026; plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the federal case Jan 6, 2026.
MaineU.S. District Court for the District of Maine2:25-cv-00354-SDNFiled Jul 11, 2025
Plaintiff:
Jessica Fuller, on behalf of herself and similarly situated former students
Defendants:
Hyde School, Laura Gauld, Malcolm Gauld +3 more
Forced labor under threat and deprivation (TVPRA sections 1584, 1589, 1590)Systematic emotional abuse, racial and sexual slurs, and public humiliationPhysical punishments including assault, excessive exercise, and starvationStudents forced to clean campus, staff homes, and remote wilderness propertiesHyde leadership personally profited from student exploitationHyde School (Bath, Maine)Seguin Island (Hyde work site)Eustis wilderness center (Hyde work site)
Class action complaint for child labor trafficking and abuse. Jessica Fuller, a former student, alleges that Hyde School operated as a cult-like system of forced labor and psychological abuse disguised as character education. She claims students were emotionally and physically abused, denied medical care, and forced into unpaid labor benefiting school leadership, including work at Seguin Island and the Eustis wilderness center. Filed under the federal TVPRA and Maine state law; seeking class certification and injunctive relief. Plaintiff counsel: John Steed (Island Justice Law), Kelly Guagenty and Kimberly Dougherty (Justice Law Collaborative). A defense motion to dismiss was filed 10/07/2025. The case could set national precedent for holding private residential programs accountable under federal trafficking laws.
Outcome: Motion to dismiss granted in part Jul 27, 2026: forced-labor and negligence claims proceed; three former leaders dismissed. On October 8, 2026, the court issued a Scheduling Order addressing discovery and class certification deadlines. On September 18, 2026, both parties submitted notices of additional authority regarding bifurcated or phased discovery. On October 8, 2026, the court issued a Scheduling Order addressing discovery and class certification deadlines. On October 22, 2026, an Order on Motion for Confidentiality Order was entered.
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma Inc v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Unknown
FederalU.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma5:25-cv-00648Filed Jun 12, 2025
Plaintiff:
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma Inc
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Insurance
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma Inc filed a civil lawsuit against Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company in the Oklahoma Western federal court relating to an insurance dispute. The docket information reflects case filings and active litigation in the federal district court. Further details regarding specific underlying incidents or claims were not detailed in the docket summary.
Plaintiffs filed a civil complaint against the operators and owners of a therapeutic boarding school alleging negligence, gross negligence, and premises liability. The minor plaintiff, a resident at the facility, experienced abuse, neglect, and exploitation while under the supervision of defendants' staff between September 2024 and November 2024. The complaint alleges that defendants failed to exercise reasonable care in the hiring, training, and supervision of employees, despite prior knowledge of mistreatment and safety risks at the facility.
Outcome: A Confidentiality/Protective Order was entered, indicating the parties stipulated certain discovery material as confidential. On October 23, 2026, the court entered an order on a motion for extension of time.
Thirteen former residents sued Mingus Mountain Academy, an all-girls program in Prescott Valley, and the companies that owned and ran it, in Maricopa County on January 13, 2025. The complaint alleges that from 2011 to the present, staff falsely imprisoned, sexually abused, sexually assaulted and raped minor residents. It names Vivant Behavioral Healthcare, three Sequel entities, Sequel co-founder Jay Ripley and a manager, Adam Hardin, and calls Mingus Mountain Estate Residential Center a Vivant subsidiary. The facility said an internal review found no evidence for the allegations.
Outcome: Pending as of the latest coverage (mid-2025); the facility said it would 'vigorously defend' the suit.
Montana Supreme Court DA 24-0687 (Clearview student suits appeal)
Unknown
MontanaSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANADA 24-0687Filed Dec 23, 2024
Plaintiffs:
Mackenzie Corinne Hoyer, Julianna Peluso, Allanah Terrett +7 more
Defendants:
Clearview Horizon, Inc., Mike Linderman, Michele Manning +2 more
NegligenceNegligent supervisionNegligent infliction of severe emotional diversityClearview Horizon
Former residents of a therapeutic boarding school filed suit against the facility and its former employees alleging negligence, negligent supervision, and emotional distress. The plaintiffs entered a stipulated judgment with the facility, and an insurance agency intervened to contest the reasonableness of the judgment, which remains stayed. The District Court subsequently dismissed claims against individual defendants as a discovery sanction, leading plaintiffs to appeal. The Montana Supreme Court granted a motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice, ruling that the appeal was premature because the underlying case remains pending and no final judgment resolving all claims has been entered.
Outcome: Defendants' motion to dismiss the appeal as premature is granted, and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice because no final judgment has been entered on all claims.
Unfair and deceptive trade practices under North Carolina law (nationwide class)Deceptive and unfair trade practices under Florida law (Florida class)Unlawful trade practices under Oregon lawNegligent misrepresentationNegligent infliction of emotional distress (the named parents individually)Trails Momentum (Hendersonville, North Carolina)Trails Carolina (Lake Toxaway, North Carolina)
Two Florida parents, Jane Doe L.Y. and June Doe A.D., filed a proposed class action on October 11, 2024 in federal court in Asheville against Trails Academy, Trails Carolina and their Oregon parent companies doing business as Family Help & Wellness. They seek to represent everyone in the United States who bought residential program services from the defendants, with a Florida subclass, and seek repayment of tuition. The complaint alleges the companies misrepresented the Trails Momentum program, which their son attended in 2021, as safe and therapeutic, pressured families through an admissions salesperson, and charged a 3,900 dollar enrollment fee plus 585 dollars a day, 24,570 dollars for the first 42 days. On December 30, 2024 the defendants moved to dismiss or compel arbitration under the family's enrollment agreement; the documents do not show a ruling or a class certification decision.
Outcome: The court entered an order on the motion to dismiss. On September 9, 2026, the court granted Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and stayed the matter pending arbitration proceedings.
Negligence and gross negligenceNegligent infliction of emotional distressForced labor in violation of the federal labor trafficking law (18 U.S.C. 1589)Unfair and deceptive trade practices under North Carolina lawUnlawful trade practices under Oregon law (against Family Help & Wellness and Wilderness Training & Consulting)Trails Momentum (Hendersonville, North Carolina)Trails Carolina (Lake Toxaway, North Carolina)
A young man identified as John Doe M.D.Y. sued Trails Academy, Trails Carolina and their Oregon parent companies, which do business as Family Help & Wellness, in federal court in Asheville on October 11, 2024. He enrolled at 18 in the Trails Momentum young-adult wilderness program and stayed 93 days, from March to June 2021 (the defense gives March 3 to June 3, 2021). The complaint alleges an invasive strip search on arrival in which a staff member touched his genitals, two weeks isolated in a cabin, censored letters and a single muted phone call home, unpaid cleaning, cooking and landscaping work, days in freezing weather with frozen boots and limited food and water, threats that he would be arrested if he left, and little mental health care, and says his mental health collapsed afterward, including a suicide attempt in October 2021. It also alleges an admissions employee misled his parents. The plaintiff asked for a Rule 9(j) extension for any medical malpractice claims, which the defendants opposed, and on December 30, 2024 the defendants moved to dismiss or compel arbitration under a March 2021 enrollment agreement; the documents do not show rulings on those motions.
Outcome: Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration was granted to the extent that the court ordered parties to proceed with arbitration, and the matter is stayed pending arbitration proceedings. On September 8, 2026, a Notice of Substitution of Counsel was filed.
Markel Insurance Company v. Trinity Teen Solutions, Inc., et al.
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming1:24-cv-00181-SWSFiled Sep 13, 2024
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company
Defendants:
Trinity Teen Solutions, Inc., Angela C. Woodward, Jerry D. Woodward +3 more
Declaratory judgment on insurance coverageNo duty to defend or indemnifyRecoupment of defense costsTrinity Teen Solutions
Markel filed a declaratory-judgment action concerning insurance coverage for the Sherman class action. The complaint asks the court to find that Markel has no duty to defend or indemnify the Trinity defendants for the underlying forced-labor claims and seeks to withdraw its defense and recover defense costs. This entry concerns a separate coverage case; the supplied filing contains Markel's allegations and requests for relief.
Outcome: All claims and counterclaims asserted in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the Clerk of Court shall close this case.
Shiver v. Acadia Healthcare, LLC and Southstone Behavioral Health
In progress
VirginiaHalifax County Circuit Court, VirginiaCL24000490-00Filed Jun 14, 2024
Plaintiff:
Joshua Shiver
Defendants:
Acadia Healthcare, LLC, Southstone Behavioral Healthcare Center, LLC (sued as Southstone Behavioral Health)
Southstone Behavioral Health (Halifax, Virginia)
Joshua Caleb Shiver, representing himself, sued Acadia Healthcare and its Halifax County, Virginia facility Southstone Behavioral Health in Halifax County Circuit Court; the complaint was filed 06/14/2024. On September 5, 2024 the court granted the defense motion to quash improper service and denied Shiver's motion for default judgment. Southstone was re-served on September 11, 2024 and filed its answer late on October 10, 2024, denying the allegations and raising defenses including the statute of limitations and Virginia's malpractice damages cap. Shiver opposed the late answer and moved again for default judgment, with a hearing noticed for November 8, 2024.
Outcome: On September 5, 2024 the court granted the defense motion to quash service and denied Shiver's first motion for default judgment. After Southstone was re-served on September 11, 2024, it filed an answer six business days late on October 10, 2024 with a motion for leave; Shiver opposed and noticed a renewed default judgment motion for November 8, 2024. The documents do not show the ruling.
FederalU.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio4:23-cv-02248Filed May 31, 2024
Plaintiff:
Monty Robinson
Defendants:
Adult & Teen Challenge, David Chadwell, D. Ditzler +5 more
Civil rights violationAdult & Teen Challenge
Monty Robinson filed a civil rights lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio against Adult & Teen Challenge and several individual defendants. The case involves prisoner civil rights claims under Section 1983. The document serves as a court docket record detailing the parties involved and the nature of the suit.
FederalUnited States District Court for the Northern District of New York3:24-cr-00170Filed Apr 3, 2024
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Geer
Coercion and enticement of a minor to travel across state lines for unlawful sexual activity (3 counts)Transportation of a minor across state lines with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity (3 counts)Family Foundation School (Hancock, New York)
Paul Geer was a choir teacher at the Family Foundation School in Hancock, New York, from 1991 until it closed in 2014. A federal indictment unsealed in April 2024 charged him with six counts of enticing three students to travel across state lines for sexual activity and taking them to Maine, Pennsylvania and Toronto, in 1994, 2000 and 2001. He was arrested in Hancock, pleaded not guilty in Syracuse and was held in jail. At a two-week jury trial in Albany in February and March 2025, the evidence showed that as a teacher he tortured students: he deprived them of food, forced them to eat regurgitated food, bound children in rugs, left them isolated in empty rooms for hours or days and forced them into physical labor, and that he raped two of the students on the trips. Witnesses included the school's owner, Emmanuel "Mike" Argiros, former students and staff, and an FBI expert on grooming. On March 3, 2025 the jury convicted him on the four counts involving two students and could not agree on the counts involving the third. On September 4, 2025 he was sentenced to 27 years and three months in federal prison, followed by three years of supervised release, and must register as a sex offender.
Outcome: Convicted March 3, 2025 on two counts of coercion and enticement and two counts of transportation, involving two of the three students; the jury could not agree on the two counts involving the third. Sentenced September 4, 2025 to 327 months (27 years and 3 months) in federal prison, three years of supervised release and sex offender registration.
FederalU.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina1:24-cv-00046-MOC-WCMFiled Feb 10, 2024
Plaintiff:
Gertrude A. Siegel
Defendants:
Trails Carolina, LLC, Wilderness Training & Consulting, LLC, Derry C. O'Kane
NegligenceGross negligenceNegligent supervisionVicarious liabilityFailure to protect a minor from alleged sexual assaultTrails Carolina
Gertrude A. Siegel sued Trails Carolina, its owner and manager Wilderness Training & Consulting, and therapist Derry O'Kane. Her February 2024 complaint alleges that, while she was 12 and in the program, another minor sexually assaulted her and defendants failed to provide adequate screening, supervision, and protection. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: On August 5, 2024, the court denied defendants' motions to dismiss and to strike. The case settled through mediation in September 2024; terms were not disclosed. The supplied complaint alleges that the plaintiff was sexually assaulted by another minor while at Trails Carolina and that defendants failed to protect her.
Finn Richardson sued Elevations RTC in Utah's Second District Court; filed 01/14/2024 and awaiting a trial date. A prelitigation panel hearing was held 08/05/2024. Salt Lake Tribune coverage framed the allegations as trauma presented as treatment.
Doe 8, et al. v. The Devereux Foundation and QualityHealth Staffing, LLC
In progress
FederalU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania2:23-cv-05131-ABFiled Dec 27, 2023
Plaintiffs:
Jane Doe 8, Jaime Torres, Jacob Wright +3 more
Defendants:
The Devereux Foundation d/b/a Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, QualityHealth Staffing, LLC
Title IXNegligence and gross negligenceNegligent hiring, retention, and supervisionConsumer-protection claimsFailure to report child abuseDevereux Advanced Behavioral Health programs and facilities
Six former residents sued Devereux and staffing company QualityHealth Staffing. Their December 2023 complaint alleges sexual abuse and assault in Devereux programs, prior reports that were not adequately addressed, and related failures to protect residents. The complaint asserts Title IX, negligence, consumer-protection, and other claims. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: The case remains active with a notice to comply with a court order. On September 22, 2026, the court granted the request for counsel to withdraw from representing Plaintiff Jaime Torres and gave him sixty days to file a status report indicating if he intends to proceed. On September 28, 2026, a notice of compliance with court order was filed. On October 19, 2026, the court issued an order on the motion to stay.
The Estate of Jason Britt and Kathleen Britt v. Agape Baptist Church, Inc. d/b/a Agape Boarding School
In progress
FederalUnited States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division6:23-cv-03316-MDHFiled Oct 11, 2023
Plaintiffs:
The Estate of Jason Britt, Kathleen Britt
Defendant:
Agape Baptist Church, Inc. d/b/a Agape Boarding School
Physical and sexual abuse of a student, including an alleged gang rapeForced labor and trafficking under 18 U.S.C. 1589, 1591 and 1595Negligent hiring, supervision and retentionFailure to protect residents and to report abuseWrongful death under Missouri lawAgape Boarding School (Stockton, Missouri)
The estate of Jason Britt and his mother Kathleen Britt sued Agape Baptist Church, Inc., which ran Agape Boarding School in Stockton, Missouri, in federal court on October 11, 2023. The complaint alleges that in 2009-2010, when he was 16, Jason Britt was taken to the unlicensed facility in the middle of the night and was strip-searched, confined in a dark padded room, beaten, forced to exercise to exhaustion, and gang-raped in a basement. It alleges Agape knew of earlier abuse at the school and failed to protect residents or report abuse. It alleges the abuse led to mental health problems and his suicide on February 4, 2022, and seeks damages under federal trafficking and forced labor law and Missouri wrongful death law. The document shows only the filing of the complaint.
Outcome: Summary judgment granted in part and denied in part Apr 30, 2026. On July 30, 2026, plaintiffs filed a motion for a hearing setting a trial date and late stage mediation. On August 31, 2026, the court entered a trial order, rules of trial, and an order on the motion for hearing.
A suit filed August 31, 2023 in Macon County says a 15-year-old placed at Brighter Path Tuskegee from January 18 to March 24 (2023) 'constantly feared for his safety' and was frequently assaulted by other residents even with staff present. It alleges staff 'frequently instigated fights among the residents,' that he received no schooling, lived in unsanitary conditions and was bitten by bedbugs. According to the coverage, his guardian ad litem found he was not made to keep up hygiene or attend classes and asked for an emergency hearing to have him removed. The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages.
Anna Claire Bates and Jane Doe v. Sequel Youth and Family Services, LLC; Sequel TSI Holdings, LLC; Brighter Path Alabama, LLC (formerly Sequel TSI of Alabama); Sequel TSI of Auldern, LLC; and John Ripley
In progress
FederalU.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama (Southern Division)2:23-cv-01063Filed Aug 14, 2023
Plaintiffs:
Anna Claire Bates (former Auldern Academy student, now an adult), Jane Doe (former Sequel Montgomery resident), A proposed nationwide class and Auldern and Sequel Montgomery subclasses
Defendants:
Sequel Youth and Family Services, LLC, Sequel TSI Holdings, LLC, Sequel TSI of Alabama, LLC (now d/b/a Brighter Path Alabama, LLC) +2 more
TVPRA 18 U.S.C. 1595 civil action for forced labor (1589)Benefiting from forced laborHuman trafficking (1590)Benefiting from traffickingAttempted forced labor (1594(a))Auldern Academy (Siler City, NC)Sequel Montgomery (Montgomery, AL)Brighter Path MontgomeryThree Points Center
Two former residents brought a proposed class action under the federal anti-trafficking law, saying Sequel made children in its programs work without pay as cleaners and groundskeepers, under threat of punishment, to save on staff. Bates says that at Auldern Academy in North Carolina (2016-2017) students did campus labor and were punished with 'Refocus' (hauling rocks, restricted food, sleeping on the floor) and 'Non-com' isolation. Jane Doe says that at Sequel Montgomery (Dec. 2014-fall 2015) children who refused work were restrained, kept longer or locked in a closet-sized seclusion room, and that she was sexually abused by a male employee and later by a social worker. In July 2024 the court refused to dismiss any claim, finding the complaint plausibly alleged a company-wide scheme, and in 2025 it kept co-founder John Ripley in the case.
Outcome: Partial motion to dismiss denied July 3, 2024 (all counts survive). Ripley's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint denied Oct. 14, 2025; his motion to certify an interlocutory appeal and stay denied Jan. 12, 2026. No settlement or class ruling seen on the docket.
FederalU.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida2:22-cv-14419Filed Aug 7, 2023
Plaintiff:
Ranald Jones
Defendant:
Teen Challenge of Florida, Inc.
Civil rights violationLabor litigationTeen Challenge of Florida, Inc.Teen Challenge of Florida
This civil case involves plaintiff Ranald Jones and defendant Teen Challenge of Florida, Inc., filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The nature of the suit is listed under other civil rights and labor litigation. The provided document details the court record metadata and bibliographic citations for the case.
Oliver Whitcomb and Amy Clifford, on behalf of an anonymous survivor, sued Chrysalis Therapeutic Boarding School (InnerChange Chrysalis, LLC), Embark Behavioral Health, and others in the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana. Filed 04/25/2023. Docket trackable on PacerMonitor.
Outcome: Dismissed with prejudice on the parties' joint stipulation Dec 18, 2025; case closed.
New YorkSupreme Court, Monroe CountyE2019007017Filed Apr 21, 2023
Plaintiffs:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Christopher Doe
Defendants:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc., Excellus Bluecross Blueshield, Excellus
Breach of contractMental health parity violationPrompt payment violationThe Ridge MaineIronwood Residential Treatment CenterViewpointElevationsIronwood+2 more
Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against their health insurance plan administrator, alleging breach of contract for wrongfully denying coverage and payment for their teenage son's stays at two residential treatment centers. The defendant argued that the treatment was not medically necessary and that external review determinations were binding. The court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the breach of contract claim regarding the first facility, finding that external review determinations do not bar court action.
Outcome: Apr 2023: summary judgment denied on the breach-of-contract claim; claim for interest dismissed.
Dean Jeffries L. Goodridge, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Taylor Goodridge v. Diamond Ranch Academy, Inc.
Ruling issued
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Utah4:22-cv-00102-DN-PKFiled Dec 30, 2022
Plaintiff:
Dean Jeffries L. Goodridge, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Taylor Goodridge
Defendant:
Diamond Ranch Academy, Inc.
Wrongful deathNegligence and knowing and reckless indifferenceMedical neglectBreach of fiduciary dutyPremises liabilityDiamond Ranch Academy (Hurricane, Utah)
Dean Goodridge, the father of Taylor Goodridge, sued Diamond Ranch Academy in federal court in Utah on December 30, 2022, ten days after his daughter died at the program. The complaint alleges that from November 2022 Taylor had extreme abdominal pain, collapsed in her own vomit and begged staff for help, and that staff told her she was faking and gave her only water and aspirin. It alleges she collapsed and died on December 20, 2022, likely of sepsis, and that the program told her father she had had a heart attack and died at the hospital when she had died before leaving the campus. It brings negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and premises liability claims and says a Utah Health Care Malpractice Act claim would be added later. The document on file is the complaint and does not show how the case ended.
Outcome: Discovery into the defendants' finances was opened per the court's order. On August 27, 2026, the court issued a memorandum decision and order granting the motion to open discovery and obtain defendants' financial information.
A.C. (mother of Connor Bennett) v. Vivant Behavioral Healthcare, LLC et al. (Brighter Path Tuskegee wrongful death)
Unknown
StateCircuit Court of Macon County, AlabamaFiled Aug 31, 2022
Plaintiff:
A.C., mother of Connor Bennett (15), on behalf of his estate
Defendants:
Vivant Behavioral Healthcare, LLC, Brighter Path Tuskegee (formerly Sequel TSI of Tuskegee), The facility's executive director (not named in coverage) +1 more
Connor Bennett's mother sued in Macon County over his death in April 2022. The complaint says Connor, 15, was placed at the Tuskegee facility by the Alabama Department of Human Resources in about October 2021 and was sexually, physically and verbally abused by other residents and staff for about six months. It says he reported sexual abuse repeatedly and staff 'chose to do absolutely nothing,' and that he ran away several times without staff noticing. According to the coverage, he injured himself at the facility on April 5, 2022 and died at Children's of Alabama six days later. The suit seeks unspecified damages from Vivant Behavioral Healthcare, which operates the renamed Brighter Path Tuskegee, and unnamed individuals.
Raekwon Thomas, et al. v. The Devereux Foundation and QualityHealth Staffing, LLC
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania2:22-cv-02166Filed Jun 2, 2022
Plaintiffs:
Raekwon Thomas, Austin Standley-Toro, John Doe 4 +2 more
Defendants:
The Devereux Foundation d/b/a Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, QualityHealth Staffing, LLC
Title IXNegligence and gross negligenceNegligent hiring, retention, and supervisionConsumer-protection claimsVicarious assault and batteryDevereux Advanced Behavioral Health programs and facilities
Five former residents sued Devereux and QualityHealth Staffing. Their June 2022 complaint alleges sexual harassment, abuse, and assault in Devereux programs and failures to address known risks and reports. The complaint asserts Title IX, negligence, and related claims. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: The case was dismissed by stipulation. On October 12, 2026, a Stipulation of Dismissal was entered. On October 21, 2026, an Order Dismissing Case - 41(b) was entered.
Anonymous v. Vista RTC
Filed
UtahFiled Mar 23, 2022
Plaintiff:
Anonymous survivors
Defendant:
Vista RTC
Vista RTC (Dimple Dell Canyon, Utah)
Anonymous survivors sued Vista RTC in Utah; complaint filed 03/23/2022 concerning the Dimple Dell Canyon facility. Salt Lake Tribune coverage described residents being bullied, shamed, and abused.
J.P., as Father and Next Friend of G.P. v. Sequel TSI of Alabama, LLC, et al.
Closed
AlabamaCircuit Court of Macon County, Alabama (removed to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, then remanded)CV-2022-900020.00 (removed to federal court as 3:22-cv-00190-CWB)Filed Mar 18, 2022
Plaintiff:
J.P., as father and next friend of G.P., a minor
Defendants:
Sequel TSI of Alabama, LLC d/b/a Sequel TSI of Tuskegee, Sequel Youth & Family Services, LLC, Sequel TSI Holdings, LLC +1 more
Outrageous conduct (intentional infliction of emotional distress)Negligent or wanton failure to monitor and superviseNegligent or wanton failure to protect a child from assault and abuseFailure to provide a safe and humane living environmentCombined and concurring negligence causing injurySequel TSI of Tuskegee (Tuskegee, Alabama)
J.P. sued on behalf of his 15-year-old son G.P. in the Circuit Court of Macon County, Alabama on March 18, 2022, against Sequel TSI of Tuskegee, a psychiatric residential treatment facility, and its parent companies Sequel Youth & Family Services and Sequel TSI Holdings. The complaint alleges that after the Alabama Department of Youth Services placed G.P. there on November 2, 2021, he was sexually assaulted within four days and was choked, beaten and bitten by residents during a seven-week stay while staff failed to intervene, and that he attempted suicide. It also alleges dangerous restraints such as chokeholds, contraband smuggled in by staff and a lack of mental health care. The defendants removed the case to federal court, where an affidavit said Sequel's parent companies had given up control of the facility on October 1, 2021 and that the facility's owner had been renamed Brighter Path Alabama. On March 17, 2023 the federal court sent the case back to state court; the documents do not show how it ended.
Outcome: The federal court issued an order on the motion to remand on March 17, 2023, and the case was terminated.
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of New Mexico1:22-cv-00061Filed Jan 27, 2022
Plaintiff:
Sharon Guerra
Defendants:
Amir Rafiei (as Executive Director), Sequel Youth and Family Services, Sequel of New Mexico, LLC +1 more
Fair labor standardsBernalillo AcademySequel Youth and Family ServicesSequel of New Mexico, LLC
Sharon Guerra filed a complaint against Sequel of New Mexico, LLC, Sequel Youth and Family Services, and Amir Rafiei alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The case was assigned to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico and later reassigned to Judge Matthew L. Garcia. After a series of motions and hearings, the court entered an order of voluntary dismissal and final judgment, closing the case.
Mattie v. Sequel Youth and Family Services, LLC. et al
Dismissed
FederalUnited States District Court for the Middle District of Florida3:21-cv-01264Filed Dec 22, 2021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lewis Mattie
Defendants:
Orvando Freeman, SequelCare of Florida, LLC, Sequel Youth and Family Services, LLC +1 more
Employment discriminationCivil rights violationSequel Youth and Family Services, LLCSequelCare of Florida, LLCSequal TSI of Florida, LLCSt. John's Youth AcademySt. Augustine Youth Academy
Ronald Lewis Mattie filed a civil rights employment discrimination action against Sequel Youth and Family Services, LLC and related entities on December 22, 2021. The plaintiff alleged discriminatory practices in violation of federal law. After a series of motions and orders, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida entered an order dismissing the case with prejudice on April 10, 2023. The dismissal closed the case without a settlement or judgment on the merits.
Outcome: Case dismissed with prejudice following a stipulation of dismissal and an order dismissing the case. On April 7, 2023, a Stipulation of Dismissal was filed. On April 10, 2023, an Order dismissing the case was entered.
A civil rights lawsuit was filed in federal court against Lakeside Academy and various corporate entities and staff members associated with Sequel Youth Services following an incident resulting in the death of a youth resident. The docket reflects initial administrative filings, summons issuance, waivers of service, acknowledgments of service, and attorney appearances. The presiding judge denied a motion for alternate service as to one of the individual defendants.
Outcome: The parties filed a stipulation of dismissal, and the court granted it, dismissing all claims with prejudice and without costs on February 16, 2022.
Tenia Goshay, Personal Representative of the Estate of Cornelius Frederick v. Lakeside for Children d/b/a Lakeside Academy, et al.
Settled
FederalUnited States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division1:21-cv-00848-RJJ-RSKFiled Sep 30, 2021
Plaintiff:
Tenia Goshay, Personal Representative of the Estate of Cornelius Frederick
Defendants:
Lakeside for Children d/b/a Lakeside Academy, Lakeside Academy, Sequel Youth Services of Michigan, LLC +14 more
Excessive force through a suffocating restraint that killed a 16-year-oldFailure to give medical aid or interveneMonell claim that Sequel had a custom and policy of dangerous restraintsCivil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments)Failure to train, supervise and discipline staffLakeside Academy (Kalamazoo, Michigan)
Tenia Goshay, as personal representative of the estate of Cornelius Frederick, sued Lakeside Academy, several Sequel Youth and Family Services companies and ten staff members in federal court in Michigan on September 30, 2021. The complaint alleges that on April 29, 2020, staff at Lakeside Academy in Kalamazoo restrained the 16-year-old state ward on the floor for throwing a sandwich and suffocated him while he said he could not breathe, then gave no aid, and that he died at Bronson Methodist Hospital on May 1, 2020. It alleges he had been restrained many times before, that Sequel was warned by Oregon Senator Sara Gelser about its restraint practices, and that the state had cited the facility for restraint and staffing violations since 2016. It states the state revoked Lakeside Academy's license after his death. The document shows only the filing of the complaint.
FederalNew Mexico District Court1:21-cv-00888Filed Sep 9, 2021
Plaintiffs:
Regina Acosta, Gabriela Nunez Vela
Defendants:
Sequel of New Mexico, LLC, Amir Rafiei
Civil rights violationEmployment discrimination
This case involves a civil rights and employment discrimination lawsuit initially filed in the Second Judicial District Court, Bernalillo County, and subsequently removed to federal court by the defendants. The plaintiffs raised claims regarding employment matters, and the federal court issued an order to show cause regarding subject matter jurisdiction. Ultimately, the parties filed a joint motion to remand the matter back to state court, which was granted, concluding the federal court proceedings.
Outcome: The case was remanded to the County of Bernalillo, Second Judicial District Court, State of New Mexico, and a final judgment was entered.
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Utah2:22-cv-00053 (D. Utah)Filed Aug 6, 2021
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ross
Defendants:
Universal Health Services, Inc., Provo Canyon School
Sexual abuse by staffChemical sedation and overmedicationExtended isolationPhysical restraintFood and sleep deprivationProvo Canyon School (Provo, Utah)
A former resident who was 13 when placed at the school in 2001 alleges he was forced to perform oral sex on a staff member at least a dozen times under threat of punishment and starvation, was locked in solitary confinement for weeks at a time, was overmedicated with Seroquel, Depakote, Trileptal and Celexa, and went two years without being allowed outdoors.
Outcome: The case was dismissed by the court. On February 27, 2023, the court entered an order on the motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution and issued a judgment.
Diane Onofrio filed a civil rights lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Arizona against Mingus Mountain Academy and Sequel Youth Services of Arizona LLC alleging discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act regarding employment. The docket reflects initial administrative filings, the issuance of summons, waiver of service, and judicial reassignment orders. The case remains ongoing with routine procedural and service tracking entries recorded through September 2021.
FederalU.S. District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma4:21-cv-00274Filed Jul 6, 2021
Plaintiff:
Amaya Rasheed
Defendant:
Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc.
Personal injuryTeen Challenge of Oklahoma
Amaya Rasheed filed a personal injury complaint against Teen Challenge of Oklahoma, Inc. in July 2021. After the plaintiff failed to respond to an order to show cause issued by the court, the judge dismissed the case without prejudice. Final judgment was entered and the civil case was terminated on October 20, 2021.
Outcome: The case was dismissed without prejudice after the plaintiff failed to respond to an order to show cause.
Markel American Insurance Co. v. Clearview Horizon, Inc., 9:21-cv-00073 (D. Mont.)
Dismissed
FederalUnited States District Court, D. Montana9:21-cv-00073Filed Jun 10, 2021
Plaintiffs:
Markel American Insurance Company, Markel Insurance Company
Defendants:
Clearview Horizon, Inc., Mike Linderman, Michele Manning
Declaratory judgmentBreach of contractNegligenceClearview Horizon, Inc.
Markel American Insurance Company filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Clearview Horizon, Inc., Mike Linderman, and Michele Manning seeking a determination of insurance coverage obligations related to underlying lawsuits. Clearview Horizon answered and filed third-party complaints against insurance agencies, and underlying plaintiffs subsequently intervened in the action. The parties have proceeded through initial scheduling, discovery planning, and preliminary pretrial statements.
Outcome: The case was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees.
Court record - Clearview Horizon (case no. 9:21-cv-00073)
Dismissed
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division9:21-cv-00073-DLCFiled Jun 10, 2021
Plaintiff:
Markel American Insurance Company
Defendants:
Clearview Horizon, Inc., Mike Linderman, Michele Manning +1 more
NegligenceBreach of contractDeclaratory judgmentIndemnification disputeClearview HorizonClearview Horizon Inc.Clearview Girls Academy
Markel American Insurance Company filed a complaint alleging that its policy with Clearview Horizon, Inc. does not cover claims arising from lawsuits alleging psychiatric services caused mental distress. The complaint asserts that the policy excludes coverage for these claims and that the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendants. It also notes that the insurer has elected to retain counsel to defend the defendants despite the lack of coverage. The complaint is the initial pleading in a federal action between parties in different states with a controversy exceeding $75,000.
Outcome: The case was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties' stipulation of dismissal as being fully settled on its merits.
Markel American Insurance Company filed a complaint alleging that its policy does not cover claims made by Clearview Horizon, Inc., Mike Linderman, and Michele Manning in lawsuits concerning psychiatric services. The complaint asserts that the policy excludes coverage for claims related to mental distress and mental anguish arising from alleged failures to provide psychiatric services. It also states that the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendants, yet has elected to retain counsel to defend them. The complaint seeks to establish that the insurer is not liable under the policy.
Outcome: The case was dismissed with prejudice as fully settled on its merits, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. On January 7, 2026, the court ordered the case dismissed with prejudice following a stipulation of dismissal by the parties.
Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health v. John Doe, Jane Doe, David Doe, et al.
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts4:21-cv-10734-TSHFiled May 4, 2021
Plaintiff:
Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health
Defendants:
John Doe, Jane Doe, David Doe +2 more
Judicial review under the Individuals with Disabilities Education ActDeclaratory and related reliefDevereux special-education school and residential programs
Devereux sought judicial review of a Bureau of Special Education Appeals decision that required it to remain the student's placement under the IDEA stay-put provision after Devereux had ended the placement on an emergency basis. The supplied complaint describes the parties' competing positions; it does not show the district court's later ruling.
Outcome: The case was terminated following a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal.
Anonymous v. Hyde School at South Woodstock (Connecticut)
In progress
ConnecticutConnecticut Superior Court, Windham Judicial District at PutnamWWM-CV21-5012142-SFiled Feb 19, 2021
Plaintiff:
Anonymous
Defendants:
Hyde School at South Woodstock, Inc., Hyde School
Negligence in supervising campers at the Summer Leadership Challenge campNegligent infliction of emotional distressNegligent supervision and training of camp staffNegligent hiring and retention of camp staffHyde School at South Woodstock (Woodstock, Connecticut)
A woman proceeding as Jane Doe sued Hyde School at South Woodstock, Inc. and Hyde School (Bath, Maine) in Connecticut Superior Court at Putnam in February 2021. She alleges that in summer 2005, as a 16-year-old camper at the schools' Summer Leadership Challenge camp on the Woodstock campus, two male campers woke her at night, took her to a secluded spot and sexually assaulted her, and that the schools failed to supervise campers and to hire, train and supervise staff properly, causing lasting PTSD and depression. The court allowed her to proceed under a pseudonym (temporary order March 2, 2021; full ruling by Judge Ann E. Lynch on June 8, 2021); no order sealing the file appears, only the pseudonym order. After a request to revise, she filed a revised complaint on September 14, 2021 and withdrew four duplicate emotional-distress counts; a defense motion for nonsuit over late discovery answers (September 2021) was followed by her compliance that October, and pleadings were certified closed on May 29, 2024. Discovery included her December 2022 deposition, out-of-state depositions of a former roommate and former boyfriend, a treating counselor and a causation expert for the plaintiff, a defense psychiatric examination the court allowed over her objection, and a subpoena to former head of school Duncan McCrann. The defendants moved for summary judgment in August 2024, arguing she has no evidence the campers or any staff member had a known propensity for such conduct; the filings end with that motion pending and the February 2025 trial continued by agreement toward June 2025.
Outcome: No final judgment, settlement or withdrawal of the action appears in the filings. On Sep 4, 2024 the court let the defendants file a late summary judgment motion; the plaintiff's response deadline was extended to Nov 18, 2024. On Oct 30, 2024 the court granted a joint motion to continue the Feb 4, 2025 jury trial (requested to early June 2025).
The State of New Hampshire indicted Mark Davis for possession of child sexual abuse images. The indictment alleges that Davis knowingly possessed a visual representation of a child engaging in sexual conduct. The indictment was filed in the Superior Court of New Hampshire, Cheshire County, on January 25, 2021. The case remains pending.
An indictment was filed in the Superior Court of Cheshire County, New Hampshire, charging Mark Davis with the crime of possession of child sexual abuse images. The indictment alleges that on or about April 12, 2018, the defendant knowingly possessed or controlled visual representations of children engaging in sexually explicit conduct. This document represents the formal charging instrument returned as a true bill by the grand jury.
An indictment was filed in the Superior Court of Cheshire County, New Hampshire, charging Mark Davis with possession of child sexual abuse images alleged to have occurred on or about April 12, 2018, in Hinsdale, New Hampshire. The document records the grand jury's true bill charging the defendant with a class A felony under RSA 649-a:3. The case details the specific digital file alleged to have been knowingly possessed or controlled by the defendant.
On January 25, 2021, a grand jury in Cheshire County Superior Court issued an indictment against Mark Davis of Hinsdale, New Hampshire, alleging possession of child sexual abuse images in violation of RSA 649-323. The indictment alleges that Davis knowingly possessed visual representations of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The document records the filing of the criminal charge and does not indicate any resolution or court ruling at this time.
ArizonaU.S. District Court for the District of Arizona3:21-cv-08013-SPLFiled Jan 21, 2021
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Sweidy
Defendants:
Spring Ridge Academy, Kate Deily, Jean Courtney +6 more
Actual and constructive fraud in inducing enrollmentArizona Consumer Fraud Act violationsBreach of contract and warrantyBreach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealingCivil RICOSpring Ridge Academy (Mayer, Arizona)
Kimberly Sweidy sued Spring Ridge Academy, a therapeutic boarding school for girls in Mayer, Arizona, and eight of its staff in federal court in Arizona on January 21, 2021, after enrolling her daughter there in December 2019 and removing her in February 2020. She alleges the school misrepresented its program before enrollment, used seminars modeled on Lifespring-style large group awareness training rather than evidence-based therapy, and used shaming, isolation and restricted parent contact. In August 2023 the court dismissed the individual staff defendants except Admissions Director Kate Deily and left only the fraud and consumer fraud claims for trial. A jury trial ran from May 29 to June 14, 2024, with testimony from school leaders and staff, former students, a parent of another student and expert witnesses on both sides. The jury returned a $2.5 million verdict for Sweidy on June 14, 2024. On January 8, 2025 Judge Steven P. Logan granted a new trial, finding a juror had likely visited Reddit during deliberations and later posted in the Troubled Teens subreddit that they had served on the jury, so the verdict no longer stands and the case awaits retrial.
Outcome: On August 15, 2023 the court granted summary judgment to Veronica Borges, Jean Courtney, Suzanne Courtney, Brandon Courtney, Erin Smith, Leslie Filsinger and Justin Zych, and dismissed every claim except fraud and consumer fraud against Spring Ridge Academy and Kate Deily. After a jury trial that began May 29, 2024, the jury returned a $2.5 million verdict for Kimberly Sweidy on June 14, 2024. On January 8, 2025 the court granted the defendants' motion for a new trial, finding a reasonable possibility that a juror viewed prejudicial outside information on Reddit during deliberations, and vacated the verdict; pending motions for attorney fees and costs were denied as moot.
Mary Ann McMahan-McWhorter v. Sequel TSI Holdings, LLC
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama5:20-cv-01926Filed Dec 3, 2020
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann McMahan-McWhorter
Defendant:
Sequel TSI Holdings, LLC
Disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities ActRetaliation for requesting a disability accommodationWrongful termination
Mary Ann McMahan-McWhorter, who worked in accounts receivable for Sequel TSI Holdings in Huntsville, Alabama from about May 2014, sued the company in federal court on December 3, 2020. She alleges that after she developed a vision condition in early 2019 and asked for dimmer lighting, Sequel moved her to a brighter workstation, gave her screen-heavy data entry work as a demotion, and fired her on about April 4, 2019. She brought disability discrimination and retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act after an EEOC charge. This is an employment case, not an abuse case. The parties jointly dismissed it with prejudice and the court closed it on August 24, 2021.
Outcome: The parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal, which dismissed the case with prejudice; on August 24, 2021 Judge Liles C. Burke directed the clerk to close the case. The documents do not show any settlement terms.
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming20-CV-00215-SWSFiled Nov 25, 2020Settlement: $2.3 million
Plaintiffs:
Carlie Sherman, Anna Gozun, Amanda Nash +2 more
Defendants:
Trinity Teen Solutions, Inc., Triangle Cross Ranch, LLC, Monks of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary of Mount Carmel (Mystic Monk Coffee) +7 more
Forced labor of teens under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization ActTrafficking for laborRICO violationsPromised therapies the programs did not provideNegligence and negligent infliction of emotional distressTrinity Teen Solutions (Powell, Wyoming)Triangle Cross Ranch (Powell, Wyoming)Mount Carmel Youth Ranch (Wyoming)Rock Creek Ranch (Wyoming)Trinity Teen Solutions, Inc.
Former residents Carlie Sherman, Anna Gozun, Amanda Nash, Andrew Scavuzzo and Ehan Jelinek sued Trinity Teen Solutions, Triangle Cross Ranch, the Schneider and Woodward families who own and run them, a Carmelite monastery that sells Mystic Monk Coffee, the Diocese of Cheyenne, and others in the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming, first filing in November 2020 and filing a first amended complaint on February 12, 2021. The suit alleges the ranches near Powell, Wyoming promised parents therapy and schooling and instead made teens work long hours on the ranches without pay under threat of punishment and longer stays. The district court dismissed the RICO and negligence claims, leaving forced labor and trafficking claims under federal law, and later denied class certification. On October 31, 2023 the Tenth Circuit vacated that denial and sent the class certification question back to the district court. In 2025 the case settled as a class action: 262 women who were sent to the ranches as teenagers will share $2.3 million from Trinity Teen Solutions and Triangle Cross Ranch, with no admission of wrongdoing. Class members who accept payment must agree not to disparage the defendants; lead plaintiff Anna Gozun declined to take part. Judge Scott Skavdahl approved the settlement in fall 2025 as fair given the risk of recovering nothing, and the case closed on October 6, 2025.
Outcome: The district court dismissed the RICO, negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims under Rule 12(b)(6), leaving the forced labor and trafficking claims. After the plaintiffs moved for class certification in August 2022, the district court denied it. On October 31, 2023, in a published opinion (No. 22-8080), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held the district court had applied the wrong legal standards for commonality, typicality and predominance, vacated the denial of class certification and sent the case back for further proceedings. The United States filed an amicus brief in the appeal. Back in the district court, the case settled in 2025 for $2.3 million, to be shared by a class of 262 former residents; the defendants admitted no wrongdoing and class members who accept payment must agree not to disparage them. Judge Scott Skavdahl gave final approval in fall 2025 and the case was terminated on October 6, 2025.
In re Red River Behavioral Health System LLC (Chapter 7)
Closed
FederalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota20-30555Filed Oct 20, 2020
Defendant:
Red River Behavioral Health System, LLC
Red River Behavioral Health System, LLCMeridian Behavioral Health, LLC
Red River Behavioral Health System, LLC filed a Chapter 7 voluntary bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of North Dakota. The court proceedings involved administrative matters such as the appointment of trustees, the evaluation of the necessity for a healthcare ombudsman, and subsequent examinations and appearances by creditors and interested parties.
Outcome: The Chapter 7 bankruptcy case has been terminated.
StalkingCivil stalkingInjunctionAttorney feesCivil stalking injunctionEva Carlston Academy
The founder and executive director of a residential treatment program for young women sought a civil stalking injunction against a neighboring resident who persistently protested the facility and directed profanities and provocative gestures at her and individuals associated with the program. The district court initially denied the injunction and the neighbor's request for attorney fees. On appeal, the Utah Supreme Court held that the lower court erred in its interpretation of the stalking statute, its reasonable person analysis, and its First Amendment application. Consequently, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case for a new determination.
Outcome: Supreme Court reversed the district court's denial of a civil stalking injunction, vacated the attorney-fees ruling, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
This document is an appellee response brief filed in the Utah Supreme Court regarding a certified question of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The plaintiff, who was injured while participating in a wilderness therapy program, argues that his claim for simple negligence is not subject to the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act. The defendant contends that wilderness therapy constitutes health care and that the program operates as a health care provider under the Act, bringing the negligence claim within its scope.
Outcome: Certified question addressed regarding whether wilderness therapy constitutes health care under the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act.
Plaintiff Jacob M. Scott filed a lawsuit against WinGate Wilderness Therapy, LLC following an injury he sustained while participating in a hiking activity during his enrollment in the wilderness therapy program in March 2015. The program was intended to treat behavioral, substance abuse, and mental health issues according to a treatment plan prepared by a licensed counselor. The primary legal issue before the court is whether the claim constitutes a medical malpractice action subject to Utah's Health Care Malpractice Act, given that the injury occurred during a mandated wilderness activity.
A mother sued Sequel Schools and Kingston Academy in Roane County in February 2020, seeking $4.5 million. The suit alleges her son was raped repeatedly by a staff member and by another student in a bathroom and that the facility failed to supervise, knowingly letting an unsafe adult supervise children. It says her son has PTSD. Sequel said it could not comment on pending litigation.
United States, et al. ex rel. Rodney Brockenbrough v. TrueCore Behavioral Solutions, LLC, et al.
Filed
FederalUnited States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division8:19-cv-02557-TPB-AASFiled Oct 16, 2019
Plaintiffs:
United States of America, State of Florida, State of Texas +1 more
Defendants:
TrueCore Behavioral Solutions, LLC, Boyne Capital, BHSB Holdings, Inc. +5 more
False Claims Act violations for National School Lunch Program fundsUsing a nonprofit foundation as a front so for-profit youth facilities could claim school lunch moneyFlorida False Claims Act violationsTexas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act violationsRetaliation against the relator
Rodney Brockenbrough, former chief operating officer of TrueCore Behavioral Solutions, filed a sealed qui tam complaint on October 16, 2019, on behalf of the United States, Florida and Texas against TrueCore, its private equity owner Boyne Capital and related holding companies, the G4S entities that formerly ran the business, and the Henry & Rilla White Youth Foundation. The complaint alleges that the White Foundation posed as the owner of nineteen for-profit G4S/TrueCore youth facilities so they could collect National School Lunch Program money that only nonprofit institutions may receive. It alleges TrueCore quietly left the program in 2018 after a Texas audit, then cut staffing and overtime to make up the lost money, and that Brockenbrough resigned on August 2, 2019. It seeks treble damages and penalties under the federal and state false claims laws. The document shows only the filing of the complaint.
The father of a 13-year-old Northern Illinois Academy resident sued the academy's operator, Sequel Schools, and an 18-year-old fellow resident. The complaint says that on an outing to the Aurora Public Library on April 15, 2019, the older resident lured the girl into the men's restroom and raped her. It alleges the academy knew of his history of sexual aggression and failed to supervise or separate the two. He was criminally charged by Kane County authorities.
Scott and Nicole Goss appealed a trial court decision involving Solstice East, LLC. The North Carolina Court of Appeals reviewed the matter and issued an unpublished opinion. The document provides basic appellate docket and counsel information for the case.
Outcome: An unpublished opinion was issued by the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Parents filed a lawsuit against a residential treatment center alleging breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty after their daughter was administered an excessive dosage of prescription medication and subjected to isolation during her placement. The trial court granted the defendant's motions to dismiss the claims under Rule 12(b)(6), concluding that the claims arose from medical treatment and constituted medical malpractice. On appeal, the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the claims.
Outcome: Trial court orders granting motions to dismiss without prejudice affirmed.
The family of Van Johnson, a 61-year-old construction worker killed behind a Madison Publix in August 2017, sued Sequel and the two youths charged with his killing. Police said the two had left the Sequel TSI (Three Springs) facility on Browns Ferry Road the night before. The complaint says the facility was understaffed and poorly trained and failed to recognize the two as threats despite their 'history of violence, aggression, lack of empathy,' and that several youths had escaped in the years before. The family's lawyer said they wanted the facility closed or its security strengthened.
Outcome: No reported outcome found. Sequel closed the Madison facility in August 2019.
NevadaJustice Court of Beatty Township, Nye County, Nevada19CR00069BFiled Aug 6, 2019
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada
Defendants:
Patricia Lynn Chappuis, Marcel Claude Chappuis
Child abuse or neglect, Category B felony under NRS 200.508(1)(b)(1) (45 counts, one per child)Failing to give enrolled children enough safe drinking water and letting them drink unsafe tap waterFailing to screen and supervise faculty and staff to protect children from physical and verbal abuseNorthwest Academy (Amargosa Valley, Nevada)
In August 2019 the Nye County District Attorney filed a criminal complaint charging Patricia Lynn Chappuis and Marcel Claude Chappuis with 45 counts of felony child abuse or neglect over their running of Northwest Academy, 1492 South Highway 373 in Amargosa Valley, Nevada. Each count concerns a different enrolled child, aged roughly 11 to 17. Prosecutors alleged that between February 9, 2018 and February 12, 2019 the defendants failed to give the children enough potable water, let them drink unsafe tap water, and failed to screen and supervise staff to protect the children from physical and verbal abuse. The complaint was filed in the Beatty Township Justice Court on August 6, 2019, with an arraignment set for August 19, 2019. In July 2021 the case ended in a plea agreement: Marcel Chappuis pleaded no contest to two misdemeanor counts of disturbing the peace, Patricia Chappuis agreed to plead guilty to one gross misdemeanor, each was fined $2,000, and no jail time or probation was sought. Both maintained their innocence through their attorney.
Outcome: Resolved by plea agreement. On July 19, 2021 in Beatty Justice Court, Marcel Chappuis pleaded no contest to two misdemeanor counts of disturbing the peace and paid a $2,000 fine; Patricia Chappuis waived her preliminary hearing and agreed to plead guilty to one gross misdemeanor count in district court in Tonopah, with a $2,000 fine. Prosecutors agreed not to seek jail time or probation, and the 45 felony counts against each were dropped. News coverage found does not report Patricia Chappuis's later court date.
FederalUnited States District Court, Central District of California2:19-cv-05008-ODW-JPRFiled Jun 9, 2019
Plaintiff:
Samantha Gerson
Defendants:
Logan River Academy, Maple Rise Academy, Does 1 through 11
Childhood sexual abuseNegligenceNegligent supervisionNegligent hiring retentionNegligent failure to warn train educateLogan River AcademyMaple Rise AcademyRed Rock Canyon School
Plaintiff Samantha Gerson filed a civil complaint against Logan River Academy and affiliated staff members alleging childhood sexual abuse, negligence, and related claims. The complaint details her involuntary transport from her high school in California to the residential facility in Utah in 2008, where she alleges she was subjected to abuse by a staff member. The document outlines multiple claims for relief including emotional distress, negligent supervision, and failure to warn or train.
Outcome: The court granted the motion to transfer venue to the District of Utah and denied the motion to dismiss as moot, terminating the case in this district.
FederalUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA2:19-cv-05008-ODW-JPRFiled Jun 9, 2019
Plaintiffs:
SAMANTHA GERSON, Samantha Gerson
Defendants:
Logan River Academy dba Maple Rise Academy, DOES 1 through 11, Logan River Academy
Childhood sexual abuseNegligenceNegligent supervisionNegligent hiring retentionNegligent failure to warn train educateLogan River AcademyMaple Rise AcademyRed Rock Canyon School
Plaintiff Samantha Gerson filed a civil complaint against Logan River Academy and associated staff members alleging childhood sexual abuse, negligence, and related torts. The complaint details allegations that Plaintiff was involuntarily removed from her high school in California and transported to the residential facility in Utah, where she experienced abuse by a staff member. The document outlines multiple claims for relief including failure to supervise, emotional distress, and requests for punitive damages.
Outcome: The court granted the defendant's motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the District of Utah, and denied the motion to dismiss as moot.
Four parents filed a class action lawsuit against the Wilderness Treatment Center and Wilderness Alternative School in Montana, alleging that the facility failed to provide adequate security and supervision to prevent their sons from running away. The plaintiffs claim that facility staff falsely assured them the program was equipped to handle flight risks despite warnings. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that the center discontinued the boys' medications, contributing to dangerous behavior, and left vehicle keys unsecured, allowing the youths to temporarily leave the facility.
Outcome: The case was dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
Two sets of parents from North Carolina and Louisiana filed a class action alleging that Wilderness Treatment Center misrepresented the safety and effectiveness of its services for at‑risk minors. The complaint asserts that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, allowing the plaintiffs' sons to escape and obtain unsecured keys. The plaintiffs claim the defendants engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation and negligence in staffing and security practices.
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division9:18-cv-00156-DWMFiled Sep 5, 2018
Plaintiffs:
John Walker, Lisa Walker, C.G. (minor child) +3 more
Defendants:
Wilderness Alternative School Inc., WTC
FraudDeceptive practicesNegligenceBreach of contractConsumer protectionWilderness Treatment CenterWilderness Alternative School
The plaintiffs, a group of parents and their minor children, filed a class action complaint against Wilderness Alternative School Inc., alleging deceptive advertising, false representations, and inadequate staffing that led to their children escaping the facility. The complaint asserts claims of fraud, consumer deception, negligence, and breach of contract under federal class action jurisdiction. This filing initiates federal litigation seeking injunctive relief and damages on behalf of a nationwide class of consumers who purchased the defendant's services.
Outcome: The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification, granted the defendant's motion to deny class certification, and dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
Court opinion - Lighthouse Christian Academy, 2018
Unknown
FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida, First DistrictNo. 1D17-4313Filed Jul 25, 2018
Plaintiffs:
Genesis Ministries, Inc., Genesis
Defendants:
Gregory S. Brown, as Property Appraiser for Santa Rosa County, Florida, Stan Colie Nichols, as Tax Collector for Santa Rosa County, Florida, Leon M. Biegalski, as Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue
Genesis Ministries, Inc. appealed a summary judgment order concerning the denial of religious tax exemptions for property used to operate a Christian church and school. The appellate court found that Genesis was not entitled to tax exemptions for the years 2005 through 2012 because a separate corporate entity used the property. However, the court ruled that the property appraiser failed to comply with statutory notice requirements when revoking the exemption for the 2013 tax year, invalidating that denial.
Outcome: Affirmed the trial court's conclusion that Genesis was not entitled to tax exemption from 2005 to 2012, but reversed the grant of summary judgment regarding the 2013 taxes and remanded with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of Genesis due to inadequate statutory notice.
Plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit against Aetna Life Insurance Co. alleging wrongful denial of coverage for medically necessary mental health and substance abuse services provided by licensed wilderness therapy programs and residential treatment centers. The lawsuit claims that Aetna imposes a blanket exclusion violating health plan terms and the federal Mental Health Parity Act. Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of similarly situated insured individuals who were denied coverage for licensed wilderness therapy programs or residential treatment centers.
Outcome: The court dismissed the action without prejudice after the plaintiffs failed to file an amended complaint following the granting of the defendant's motion to dismiss.
D.S., B.S. and A.S. v. Sequel Pomegranate Health Systems, LLC
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio (Columbus)2:18-cv-00416Filed Apr 30, 2018
Plaintiffs:
D.S. (minor at the time), B.S. (father), A.S. (mother)
Defendant:
Sequel Pomegranate Health Systems, LLC
42 U.S.C. 1983: substantive due process (14th Amendment)42 U.S.C. 1983: 14th Amendment42 U.S.C. 1983: 8th Amendment (deliberate indifference)Negligent supervisionBattery (respondeat superior)Sequel Pomegranate Health Systems (Columbus, OH)
D.S. and his parents sued Pomegranate, a psychiatric residential facility in Columbus, Ohio, where Franklin County Children Services had placed him in November 2017. The complaint says that on December 2, 2017, a few days after he arrived, D.S. was held down and raped by three other residents while the single staff member on the unit was busy with a personal phone. It says Columbus police had received more than 248 emergency calls from Pomegranate since March 22, 2017, and that the facility was understaffed and did not separate violent residents. The complaint says Children Services substantiated abuse and neglect charges against Pomegranate. The parties stipulated to dismissal with prejudice in November 2018.
Outcome: Dismissed with prejudice by stipulation of the parties on Nov. 15, 2018 (case terminated Nov. 16, 2018), after a mediation notice; terms not disclosed.
This is an employment-related lawsuit filed by Stormy Blankinship against Sequel Youth and Family Services in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The case was initiated on September 1, 2017, under federal jurisdiction. The provided court documentation lists the parties, attorneys, and related case information.
Adrian Lovell v. Devereux Foundation, Inc. d/b/a Devereux Glenholme School
Dismissed
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut3:17-cv-01411-SRUFiled Aug 21, 2017
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lovell
Defendant:
Devereux Foundation, Inc. d/b/a Devereux Glenholme School
NegligenceNegligence per seRecklessnessBreach of fiduciary dutyPremises liabilityDevereux Glenholme School
Adrian Lovell alleged that, while he was a 15-year-old student at Devereux Glenholme School, an adult school employee sexually abused him and school leaders failed to protect him. The complaint asserts negligence, recklessness, premises-liability, and related claims. These are allegations, not findings.
Outcome: The case was dismissed with prejudice.
Frederic Yeomans IV v. Discovery Ranch, Inc.
Dismissed
UtahFourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Spanish Fork DivisionFiled Aug 18, 2017
Plaintiffs:
Frederic Yeomans IV, Frederic H. Yeomans IV
Frederic Yeomans IV, an Arizona resident, filed a complaint against Discovery Ranch, Inc., a Utah residential treatment facility. The plaintiff alleges that the facility failed to adequately screen and supervise another resident, resulting in repeated sexual assault of the plaintiff while enrolled. The complaint asserts claims of negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, medical negligence, and sexual abuse. The plaintiff seeks relief for physical and psychological harm.
Outcome: Related federal case 2:17-cv-00768 (D. Utah) dismissed without prejudice Dec 14, 2017.
United States ex rel. v. Meridian Behavioral Health
Dismissed
FederalDistrict Court, D. Minnesota0:17-cv-01806Filed May 30, 2017
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Meridian Behavioral Health
Meridian Behavioral Health
A civil action was filed in the District of Minnesota involving the United States of America and Meridian Behavioral Health. The case docket includes proceedings regarding the unsealing of the case, an order dismissing the case, and a final judgment entered in October 2022.
Outcome: The case was dismissed. On October 5, 2022, an Order Dismissing Case was entered, followed by a Judgment on October 7, 2022.
Homeland Insurance Company of Delaware v. The Devereux Foundation
On appeal
FederalU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania2:17-cv-02415-CDJFiled May 26, 2017
Plaintiff:
Homeland Insurance Company of Delaware
Defendant:
The Devereux Foundation
Declaratory judgment regarding insurance coverageNo duty to indemnifyDevereux Glenmoore
Homeland sought a declaration that it had no duty to indemnify Devereux under two insurance policies for an underlying personal-injury judgment. The underlying complaint concerned an alleged escape from Devereux's Glenmoore facility followed by a shooting that injured Eric Johnson. The supplied document is the insurer's complaint and does not establish the coverage case's outcome.
Outcome: The court granted plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment and denied defendants' joint motion for partial summary judgment, directing the clerk to close the case. Subsequently, a notice of appeal was filed. On January 5, 2021, a Notice of Appeal was filed. On January 21, 2021, a filing fee for the notice of appeal was processed.
Dorothy Uwakwe v. Pelham Academy and Justice Resource Institute, Inc.
Closed
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts1:17-cv-10558-FDSFiled Apr 1, 2017
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Uwakwe
Defendants:
Pelham Academy, Justice Resource Institute, Inc.
Race and national-origin discriminationTitle VIIEmployment discrimination claimsPelham Academy
Dorothy Uwakwe alleged race- and national-origin discrimination by her former employers, Pelham Academy and Justice Resource Institute. The supplied December 2017 order resolved the action for defendants: summary judgment was granted on five counts and two others were dismissed.
Outcome: On December 11, 2017, the court granted defendants' summary-judgment motion on counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 and dismissed counts 5 and 6.
Chudnovsky v. Provo Canyon School
Unknown
UtahFiled Jan 3, 2017
Plaintiff:
Parents of a former resident (Chudnovsky)
Defendants:
Provo Canyon School, Universal Health Services
NegligenceIntentional infliction of emotional distressDenial of medical careFailure to protect a self-harming residentProvo Canyon School (Springville, Utah)
Parents allege their daughter was denied medical care for nearly two weeks after breaking her thumb, and was given access to staples, pens and plastic cutlery despite the program knowing she struggled with compulsive self-harm.
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company v. Teen Challenge of Nevada, Inc.
Unknown
FederalU.S. District Court, District of Nevada3:16-cv-00243Filed May 6, 2016
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company
Defendants:
Teen Challenge of Nevada, Inc., David P. Davis, Kari Frances Davis
Declaratory judgmentTeen Challenge of Nevada, Inc.
Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company filed a complaint for declaratory relief relating to an insurance policy involving Teen Challenge of Nevada, Inc. and individual defendants David P. and Kari Frances Davis. After the individual defendants failed to respond or appear, the plaintiff requested and obtained a clerk's entry of default. The court subsequently granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment and issued declaratory relief in favor of the insurance company.
Outcome: Default judgment granted in favor of plaintiff Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company against defendants David P. Davis and Kari F. Davis.
Diana L. Ramsey v. The Devereux Foundation d/b/a Devereux Pocono Center
Settled
FederalU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania3:16-cv-01758-JMMFiled Jan 25, 2016Settlement: $800,000
Plaintiff:
Diana L. Ramsey, as administratrix of the estate of Megan Louise Ramsey
Defendant:
The Devereux Foundation d/b/a Devereux Pocono Center
Professional negligenceWrongful deathSurvival actionDevereux Pocono Center
Diana L. Ramsey sued Devereux Pocono Center in connection with the death of her daughter, Megan Ramsey, who died in July 2014. A December 2017 order approved an $800,000 settlement of the wrongful-death and survival claims. The supplied complaint contains allegations; the settlement order does not state an admission of liability.
Outcome: A December 2017 court order authorized settlement of all claims for $800,000 and directed the case closed.
Criminal case record - Triangle Cross Boys Ranch
Unknown
WyomingSupreme Court of WyomingS-14-0212Filed Mar 26, 2015
Plaintiff:
State of Wyoming, Wyoming Department of Family Services
Defendants:
Triangle Cross Ranch, Inc., Gerald E. Schneider, Michaeleen Schneider +1 more
The Wyoming Department of Family Services sought an injunction against Triangle Cross Ranch for operating a child caring facility without required state certification. Triangle Cross argued it fell under a statutory exception for ranches not offering services to homeless, delinquent, or intellectually disabled children. The district court concluded the facility was offering services requiring certification and issued a permanent injunction. The Supreme Court of Wyoming affirmed the district court's ruling.
Outcome: District court order enjoining Triangle Cross from operating an uncertified child caring facility is affirmed.
Court record - Aspen Education Group (case no. 2:2014cv00866)
Closed
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Utah2:14cv866Filed Feb 18, 2015Settlement: $354,899.12
Plaintiffs:
Wilderness Training & Consulting, LLC, Lake Montezuma RTC, LLC, Escalante RTC, LLC +2 more
Defendants:
Aspen Education Group, Inc., Aspen Youth, Inc., Turn-About Ranch, Inc. +4 more
Breach of contractConversionAspen Education GroupLake Montezuma RTCEscalante RTCSyracuse RTCSyracuse Institute+4 more
The plaintiffs, owners of several residential treatment programs, sued the defendants for breach of contract and conversion over misdirected payments. The defendants failed to remit the payments to the plaintiffs as required by the purchase agreement. The court found the plaintiffs had a substantial likelihood of success and granted the motion for a writ of replevin. The order was signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on February 18, 2015.
Outcome: The court granted a motion to dismiss with prejudice, closing the case.
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Utah Central Division2:14cv866Filed Feb 18, 2015Settlement: $354,899.12
Plaintiffs:
Wilderness Training & Consulting, LLC, Lake Montezuma RTC, LLC, Escalante RTC, LLC +2 more
Defendants:
Aspen Education Group, Inc., Aspen Youth, Inc., Turn-About Ranch, Inc. +4 more
Breach of contractConversionElevations RTCTurn-About RanchIsland View Residential Treatment CenterCopper Canyon AcademyAspen Institute for Behavioral Assessment+2 more
Plaintiffs, who purchased several residential treatment programs and therapeutic boarding schools from Sellers, filed a lawsuit alleging that Defendants wrongfully withheld misdirected payments and accounts receivable collected after the asset purchase. Defendants counterclaimed for breach of contract, arguing that Plaintiffs committed material breaches first, thereby excusing Defendants from performance. The court determined that Plaintiffs demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on their breach of contract and conversion claims and met the requirements for a prejudgment writ of replevin.
Outcome: The court granted the motion to dismiss with prejudice, closing the case.
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Utah1:2014cv00007Filed Feb 5, 2015
Plaintiffs:
Terri Myers, David Myers, SM +2 more
Defendants:
Dr. Phil Organization, Bain Capital, CRC Health Group +9 more
FraudConspiracyNegligent representationFraudulent concealmentNegligent misrepresentationElevations RTCIsland View Academy
Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit on behalf of their minor daughter alleging that media figures and corporate entities fraudulently induced them to send their daughter to a residential treatment program through misleading representations. The minor was subsequently referred to Island View Academy, where she allegedly experienced physical and psychological harm. Plaintiffs asserted claims including fraud, conspiracy, and negligent representation against various corporate and media defendants. The court denied the plaintiffs' motions for leave to amend their complaint, finding that the proposed amendments failed to state viable legal claims.
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Utah Northern Division1:14-CV-007-TCFiled Feb 5, 2015
Plaintiffs:
Terri Myers, David Myers, Plaintiffs +1 more
Defendants:
Dr. Phil Organization, Bain Capital, CRC Health Group +8 more
FraudNegligenceConspiracyNegligent representationCivil conspiracyElevations RTCIsland View Academy
The United States District Court for the District of Utah considered whether plaintiffs Terri and David Myers could file an amended complaint against Dr. Phil Organization, Bain Capital, CRC Health Group, Aspen Education Group, Island View Academy, Ryan Morten, and unnamed defendants. The plaintiffs alleged fraud, conspiracy, and negligent representation related to their minor daughter’s treatment at Island View Academy. The court reviewed the pleading deficiencies identified in a prior dismissal and evaluated whether the proposed amendments would satisfy federal pleading standards. This order addresses the court’s decision on leave to amend and the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ claims. No settlement or final judgment is indicated in this document.
Outcome: Motion to amend the complaint is denied, and all claims against Bain Capital and the Dr. Phil Defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
Court record - Elevations RTC (case no. 1:2014cv00007)
Closed
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Utah Northern Division1:14-CV-007-TCFiled Feb 5, 2015
Plaintiffs:
Terri Myers, David Myers, SM +2 more
Defendants:
Dr. Phil Organization, Bain Capital, CRC Health Group +9 more
Negligent representationFraudConspiracyFraudulent concealmentConstructive fraudElevations RTCIsland View Academy
Plaintiffs filed an action on behalf of their minor daughter alleging that media defendants and affiliated corporate entities fraudulently induced them to send the minor to a residential treatment program. The complaint alleges that the facility operated under false pretenses as a therapeutic center while subjecting youth to restrictive conditions. Plaintiffs assert claims of fraud, conspiracy, and negligent representation against various parent companies and media entities associated with the referral and operation of the facility. The court evaluated whether the plaintiffs' proposed amended complaints cured prior pleading deficiencies under federal rules.
Outcome: The court denied the plaintiffs' motions to amend or correct their complaint, and the case was terminated.
FederalU.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania5:14-cv-05755Filed Oct 6, 2014
Plaintiff:
Harry Jeffries
Defendants:
Beth Dorbransky, Teen Challenge Training Center
Civil rights violationEmployment discriminationTeen Challenge Training Center
Harry Jeffries filed a civil rights and employment discrimination action against Teen Challenge Training Center and Beth Dorbransky. After the court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, the parties engaged in settlement conferences. Ultimately, the action was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to an agreement between counsel.
Outcome: Settled; case dismissed with prejudice pursuant to agreement of counsel.
A former minor resident filed a lawsuit alleging negligence and breach of fiduciary duties by Island View Academy and Provo Canyon School regarding treatment received for emotional and psychological issues during his placements. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that the claims were barred by the applicable two-year statute of limitations for health care providers under Utah law. The court granted the defendants' motions because the action was filed four years after the plaintiff reached the age of majority.
This document describes a civil complaint filed in the First Judicial District Court of Santa Fe County, New Mexico, on February 10, 2014. The lawsuit names Tierra Blanca Ranch, its owners and employees, and insurance companies as defendants. It alleges that an individual enrolled in the youth program was mistreated and died due to the negligence of program staff. Additionally, the complaint alleges that the insurance companies failed to adequately compensate the plaintiffs for their damages.
Negligence and breach of fiduciary duty claims against Island View RTC and Provo Canyon School, naming Provo Canyon therapist Wade Taylor among the defendants. The court issued a ruling on May 13, 2015.
Outcome: Summary judgment granted for defendants Island View Academy and Provo Canyon School, and case closed.
Plaintiff Robert Reich filed a complaint against Sequel School, LLC alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The case was filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on November 26, 2013. The complaint claims that the defendant failed to comply with wage and hour requirements. No specific facilities, staff, or other organizations are named in the filing. The plaintiff seeks relief for alleged labor law violations.
FederalUnited States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division1:12-CV-905-WKWFiled Oct 16, 2012
Plaintiffs:
Debra A. Terry, Ms. Terry
Defendants:
Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Center, Inc., Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Center, Mr. Robinson +1 more
Sexual harassmentRetaliationInvasion of privacyOutrageNegligent trainingLaurel Oaks Behavioral Health CenterFemale unitDepartment of Youth ServicesMale A unitMale B unit+3 more
Debra A. Terry sued Laurel Oaks Behavioral Health Center, Inc. alleging a sexually hostile work environment and retaliation in violation of Title VII, along with state-law claims for invasion of privacy, outrage, and negligent training. The court examined the parties' motions and evidence and granted Laurel Oaks' summary judgment on the Title VII claims. The court also dismissed the state-law claims without prejudice. The decision reflects the court's finding that the plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment.
Outcome: Summary judgment granted on Title VII claims alleging a sexually hostile work environment and retaliation; state-law claims dismissed without prejudice
Court opinion - Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health
Unknown
New JerseySupreme Court of New Jerseya-54-10Filed Feb 29, 2012
Plaintiffs:
Roland Davis, Vandella Davis, Vandella Davis, as Guardian Ad Litem for Roland Davis +1 more
Defendants:
Devereux Foundation, Devereux New Jersey Treatment Network, Charlene McClain +2 more
Non delegable dutyNegligenceVicarious liabilityPhysical abuseNon-delegable duty violationDevereux New Jersey Center for AutismDevereux
The plaintiff, Roland Davis, a resident with developmental disabilities, sued Devereux Foundation alleging breach of a non‑delegable duty, negligence, and vicarious liability after a counselor assaulted him. The Supreme Court of New Jersey considered whether the facility owed a non‑delegable duty to protect residents from intentional acts of employees and whether the assault fell within the scope of employment. The Court concluded that the circumstances did not justify imposing a non‑delegable duty and that the employee’s criminal act was not within the scope of employment, resulting in no liability for the facility.
Outcome: Court held that no non-delegable duty was imposed on the institution and that the employee's criminal assault was not within the scope of employment, so liability was not imposed on Devereux Foundation
Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against Second Nature - Cascades, Inc., and individual defendants alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties reached a confidential settlement agreement, which the court reviewed and approved after briefing on public access. Subsequently, the parties filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, and the court dismissed the case with prejudice.
Outcome: The case was dismissed with prejudice following the court's approval of the confidential settlement agreement.
SLS Residential, Inc., which operated mental health residential facilities and a clinic, challenged a determination by the New York State Office of Mental Health to revoke its operating certificates due to charges including lack of character and competence and violation of patient rights. The Appellate Division found that the determination was supported by substantial evidence and rejected claims of procedural untimeliness and hearing officer bias. The court confirmed the administrative determination, denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding.
Outcome: Determination confirmed, petition denied, and proceeding dismissed on the merits.
John Bonham and Charlynn Bonham filed a lawsuit against Wolf Creek Academy, About Face Ministries, and associated individuals in the North Carolina Western Federal District Court concerning labor and Fair Labor Standards Act claims. The court issued an order adopting a memorandum and recommendations, granting a partial motion to dismiss the second through twelfth causes of action and dismissing the plaintiffs' demand for punitive damages under state law.
Outcome: Partial Motion to Dismiss the Second through Twelfth Causes of Action stated in the Plaintiffs Complaint was granted, and the plaintiffs' demand for punitive damages under state law was dismissed.
Doe et al filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Utah on April 9, 2010. The plaintiffs, five individuals identified as John, Jane, Jack, Jim, and Jen Doe, allege personal injury arising under federal law against Children and Youth Services and several individual defendants. The case is listed as a federal question civil suit (28 U.S.C. §1331) and a jury trial was demanded by the plaintiffs. No further rulings or settlements are indicated in the docket summary.
FederalUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit08-16790Filed Jan 8, 2010
Plaintiffs:
David Barragan, Student plaintiffs, Parent plaintiffs
Defendants:
Robin Landry, Division of Child Protective Services of the State of Nevada, Nevada Division of Child and Family Services
Civil rights violationUnreasonable search and seizureFourteenth amendment liberty interestAbundant Life Academy
Students and their parents filed claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a child and family services manager alleging Fourth Amendment violations during a removal from a school facility, as well as Fourteenth Amendment violations of family integrity. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, holding that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity because the contours of the constitutional rights at issue were not clearly established at the time of the actions.
Outcome: Affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant based on qualified immunity.
The school sued the human rights group HEAL for libel over its published records of police calls and complaints about the program. HEAL describes the suit as a strategic lawsuit against public participation and disputes a later NATSAP bulletin's account of it.
The plaintiffs, Jacqueline Ghettie Steakley and Lauren Steakley, filed a wrongful death action against Universal Health Services and related entities in the Western District of Tennessee. The complaint alleges that the defendants were responsible for the death of a minor. The case was filed on November 5, 2009 and is currently pending. The docket entry provides basic party information and the nature of the suit under diversity jurisdiction.
Teen Challenge International Nashville Headquarters et al v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Unknown
FederalU.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee3:07-cv-00668Filed Sep 9, 2009
Plaintiffs:
Jessica A., Ben C., Nikki C. +2 more
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Civil rights violationTeen Challenge International Nashville Headquarters
A civil rights lawsuit was filed under the Fair Housing Act involving Teen Challenge International Nashville Headquarters, Teen Challenge International USA, Inc., and individual plaintiffs against the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. This document provides bibliographic details and summaries of the federal district court case from the U.S. Government Publishing Office repository. The record details administrative information regarding the judicial publication of the court proceeding.
Plaintiffs Alvin, Cynthia, and Alvin Chase Robertson filed a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Utah against Red Rock Canyon School LLC and associated individual defendants, including Melanie Habibian, Sherman Habibian, and Todd Hockenbury. The case falls under the nature of suit category for other personal injury. The action involves allegations related to the operations and care provided at the Red Rock Canyon School facility.
FederalUnited States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit08-1287Filed Nov 14, 2008
Plaintiffs:
Island View Residential Treatment Center, S.S.E., S.A.E.
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.
Breach of contractDenial of benefitsElevations RTCIsland View Residential Treatment Center
Plaintiffs filed an ERISA lawsuit seeking to recover the cost of in-patient care furnished by Island View Residential Treatment Center to a teenage patient. The defendant health insurance provider denied reimbursement for portions of the stay, determining that the medical needs could be met by less intensive care. Multiple independent reviews upheld the denial of benefits. The court ultimately held for the defendant based on a contractual provision barring legal action after two years.
The case Elsey v. West Ridge Academy was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Utah on May 15, 2008. Plaintiff Tyler Elsey alleges personal injury arising from actions at West Ridge Academy. The filing indicates a diversity jurisdiction and a notice of removal. No further rulings or settlements are indicated in the docket entry.
Outcome: The case was terminated on June 24, 2008.
PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania820 C.D. 2007Filed Jan 15, 2008
Plaintiffs:
Nedco Madison Avenue, LLC, The Lackawanna Institute, Paul Mansour
Defendants:
Lackawanna College, Betton House, LLC, Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Scranton
Zoning violationFamily Foundation SchoolBetton HouseFamily Schooltransitional living centerdormitory
The appellate court reviewed a zoning variance dispute involving Nedco Madison Avenue, LLC and its lease of 501 Madison Avenue to Lackawanna College and Betton House, LLC. The lower court had found that part of the use exceeded the dormitory variance and upheld certain violations. On appeal, the Commonwealth Court affirmed the lower court's decision, confirming that the variance did not cover a transitional living center. The order finalizes the court's ruling on the zoning issue.
Outcome: Affirmed the Court of Common Pleas order regarding the variance and use of the property
Plaintiffs filed an action against a treatment facility for emotionally disturbed youth to recover damages after two infant plaintiffs were abused by a resident during unmonitored home visits. The resident, who had a well-documented history of pedophilic behavior, was admitted to the facility for treatment. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment on liability in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the facility failed to exercise professional judgment when granting home visit privileges without assessing the family's ability to supervise the resident.
Outcome: Order granting plaintiffs summary judgment as to liability for negligent failure to exercise professional judgment and denying defendant's cross motion for summary judgment is unanimously affirmed.
FederalUnited States District Court, District of Utah, Central Division2:07-cv-755 CWFiled Jul 12, 2007
Plaintiff:
Disability Law Center
Defendants:
Discovery Academy, Brent Hall
Civil rights violationOASIS AscentDiscovery Academy
The Disability Law Center filed a complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against Discovery Academy and its executive director, demanding full access to facility residents and records to investigate alleged abuse and restraint practices. The court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment, finding that the claims regarding the initial resident were moot and that the plaintiff lacked probable cause to investigate other current residents under the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act.
Outcome: The case was terminated on November 21, 2007.
Teen Challenge Referral Center, Inc., et al. v. Walker, et al.
Unknown
FederalM.D. Ga. (Valdosta)7:05-cv-00097-HLFiled Nov 16, 2006
Plaintiffs:
Jesse G Anderson Jr, Teen Challenge Referral Center Inc
Defendants:
Bank of America, Incorporated, Joyce D. Walker
Civil rights violationTeen Challenge Referral Center
This document is a court record for a civil lawsuit involving Teen Challenge Referral Center, Inc. and Jesse G. Anderson Jr. as plaintiffs against defendants including Joyce D. Walker and Bank of America, Incorporated. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia and involved a petition for removal under civil rights statutes. The provided document details the administrative docket information and bibliographic citations for the case.
MontanaSupreme Court of Montana (appeal from the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Sanders County)DA 10-0548Filed Oct 23, 2006
Plaintiff:
Judith Newman, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Karlye Newman
Defendants:
Robert Lichfield, World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, Inc.
Wrongful death after a student's suicide at the schoolNegligent care and supervision of a suicidal studentDeceit and negligent misrepresentation in marketingBreach of contract and fiduciary dutyCivil conspiracy and Consumer Protection Act violationsSpring Creek Lodge Academy (Thompson Falls, Montana)
Judith Newman sued over the death of her daughter Karlye, who was found hanged at Spring Creek Lodge Academy in Thompson Falls, Montana on October 7, 2004 and died at age 16. She filed suit on October 23, 2006 against Spring Creek and its directors, later adding WWASP founder Robert Lichfield, WWASP, Teen Help, National Contract and Peacox, and alleged negligent care, wrongful death and deceptive marketing to parents of suicidal youth. She settled with Spring Creek, Teen Help and National Contract in 2010, and a jury found for Lichfield and WWASP in October 2010. On March 6, 2012 the Montana Supreme Court reversed in part and ordered a new trial. The documents do not show what happened after remand.
Outcome: Newman settled with Spring Creek, Teen Help and National Contract in early 2010. A jury returned a defense verdict for Lichfield and WWASP on October 27, 2010. On March 6, 2012 the Montana Supreme Court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for a new trial, holding the trial court wrongly limited evidence on foreseeability.
FederalUnited States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware06-50861 (MFW)Filed Sep 26, 2006
Plaintiffs:
George L. Miller, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee, Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors
Defendants:
McCown De Leeuw & Co., Inc., Kids Acquisition, LLC, McCown De Leeuw & Co. III, L.P. +19 more
Breach of fiduciary dutyFraudulent transferPreferential transferDeepening insolvencyCivil conspiracyThe Brown SchoolsCEDU Education, Inc.CEDU Family of Services, Inc.CEDU School, Inc.North American Academy, Inc.+17 more
The Chapter 7 trustee for The Brown Schools and its affiliated entities brought an adversary proceeding against private equity owners, former directors, and legal counsel alleging multiple financial claims including breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent and preferential transfers, and corporate waste following the debtors' bankruptcy. This document is a memorandum opinion addressing the defendants' motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. The bankruptcy court evaluated various claims, previously dismissing some and granting leave to amend others, and prepared to rule on the remaining matters.
Outcome: Court granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
J.O.R., et al. v. Hidden Lake Academy, Inc., et al.
Closed
FederalU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Gainesville Division2:06-cv-00146-WCOFiled Sep 11, 2006
Plaintiffs:
J.O.R., R.R., D.M. +1 more
Defendants:
Hidden Lake Academy, Inc., HLA, Inc., Hidden Lake Foundation, Inc. +1 more
Misrepresenting teacher and counselor credentials to familiesLetting unlicensed staff dispense prescription medicationEnrolling violent or court-ordered students despite promising otherwiseRoutine strip searches of students not disclosed to parentsUndisclosed fees and mark-ups despite advertised all-inclusive tuitionHidden Lake Academy (Dahlonega, Georgia)Ridge Creek (Dahlonega, Georgia)
Four families identified by initials filed a class action complaint on September 11, 2006 in federal court in Gainesville, Georgia against Hidden Lake Academy, its related nonprofit entities, and founder Dr. Leonard Buccellato. The complaint alleges that from 2000 onward the therapeutic boarding school misrepresented that its teachers were state certified and its counselors clinically trained, let unlicensed staff dispense medication, and enrolled violent students despite telling parents it did not. It also alleges routine strip searches, student labor, and undisclosed charges and mark-ups on top of an advertised all-inclusive tuition of over $5,900 a month. The copy on file is the first 27 pages of the complaint and does not show how the case ended.
Outcome: The court granted the motion to approve the distribution of settlement proceeds and the case is concluded post-judgment.
Dungan, et al. v. The Academy at Ivy Ridge, et al.
Filed
FederalU.S. District Court for the Northern District of New YorkFiled Jul 25, 2006
Plaintiffs:
Bruce Dungan, Shelley Dungan, W. Patrick Dungan +22 more
Defendants:
The Academy at Ivy Ridge, Academy at Ivy Ridge, Inc., Academy at Ivy Ridge, LLC +7 more
Falsely representing the school was licensed by New York to award credits and diplomasRICO violationsFraud, fraud in the inducement and conspiracy to defraudNegligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichmentDeceptive business practices under New York General Business Law 349 and 350The Academy at Ivy Ridge (Ogdensburg, New York)
Families of former students filed a class action complaint on July 25, 2006 in federal court in the Northern District of New York against The Academy at Ivy Ridge in Ogdensburg, its owners, WWASP and Robert Lichfield, an accrediting body, and several referral companies. The complaint alleges the defendants falsely told parents and the public that Ivy Ridge was licensed and authorized by New York State to award high school credits and diplomas. It brings claims under RICO and New York law, including fraud, conspiracy, deceptive business practices and breach of contract. The document on file is the complaint and does not show how the case ended.
The United States Department of Justice brought a civil action against Youth Services International, Inc. alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The lawsuit stemmed from the facility's failure to provide sign language interpretation services and auxiliary aids to a deaf juvenile resident. Concurrently with the filing of the complaint, the parties moved for conditional dismissal based on a settlement agreement requiring remediation and compliance measures.
Outcome: ORDER granting 3 Joint Motion to Dismiss; ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING the case.
Plaintiffs filed a personal injury and civil rights lawsuit against Red Rock Canyon School and related individuals in September 2005. The court later dismissed the federal civil rights claim and stayed the remaining state law claims. The case proceeded through various scheduling and expert witness motions before terminating in November 2009.
Outcome: The court's records say the case was terminated on 2009-11-16.
Teen Challenge of New England, Inc. v. United States
Unknown
FederalU.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts1:05-cv-30167Filed Jul 19, 2005
Plaintiff:
Teen Challenge of New England, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Teen Challenge of New England
Teen Challenge of New England, Inc. filed a civil action against the United States in July 2005 in the District of Massachusetts. The case was transferred internally between judges and divisions shortly after filing. In October 2005, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, closing the case.
MarylandBaltimore County Circuit Court176 F.R.D. 517Filed Jun 29, 2005
Plaintiffs:
Claudia McClain, John Doe 1 (HS), John Doe 2 (HS) +9 more
Defendants:
State of Maryland, Maryland Department of Juvenile Services, Department of Health +1 more
Sexual abuseNegligenceCivil rights violationPhysical abuseBreach of contractMaryland Department of Juvenile ServicesCharles H. Hickey, Jr. SchoolBaltimore City Juvenile Justice CenterCheltenham Youth Detention CenterAlfred D. Noyes Children’s Center+20 more
Plaintiffs allege that the State of Maryland, through its juvenile justice agencies, failed to protect youth housed at the Charles H. Hickey, Jr. School from sexual abuse and other misconduct. They claim the agencies neglected their duty of care, resulting in harm to the children. The complaint seeks accountability for the alleged violations of the children’s civil rights and the State’s negligence in supervising the facility.
FederalU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Southern DivisionFiled Nov 2, 2004
Plaintiffs:
Cheryl Struble, Kelly Dukes, Willie Dukes, Mark P. and Sandra Riepenhoff, Patty Crawford, Cindy McCoy, Linda Griggs, Charles and Carolyn Campbell, Leroy Lawrence, Their minor sons, by next friend
Defendants:
Herman Fountain, John Fountain Jr., Josh Fountain +3 more
Fraud and breach of contract against parents who paid tuitionAssault and battery by staff and by cadets ordered to beat other cadetsFalse imprisonmentIntentional infliction of emotional distressNegligent medical careBethel Boys Academy (Lucedale, Mississippi)
Eight families of former students (called cadets) sued Herman Fountain, John Fountain Jr., Josh Fountain, Susan Churchwell and others who ran Bethel Boys Academy near Lucedale, Mississippi, in federal court, claiming federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state-law claims. The complaint alleges that staff and cadets forced by staff beat new arrivals, that boys were locked in footlockers, made to hold electric fences, held underwater at a swamp, denied bathroom breaks, sleep, food and medical care, and made to work up to 18 hours a day without pay. It alleges the academy misled parents about care, education and a staff nurse, and kept tuition and other payments. The enrollments described run from 2002 to 2003. The extracted text is missing the caption page, so the docket number, district and filing date are not shown, and the document shows nothing beyond the complaint.
Following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the wrongful death of a minor in state custody who was placed at a private facility, state agencies appealed the denial of their motion to dismiss based on sovereign immunity under the Georgia Tort Claims Act. A co-defendant facility also appealed, contending the verdict was excessive. The appellate court held that the state agencies were immune from suit under the Tort Claims Act because independent contractors and corporations cannot be considered state employees, thereby reversing the judgment against the state agencies while affirming the verdict amount against the facility.
Outcome: Judgment against the Department of Human Resources and Department of Juvenile Justice reversed; verdict against Broken Shackle Ranch affirmed.
FederalU.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana2:03-cv-02309Filed Aug 15, 2003
Plaintiff:
Troy A Autin II
Defendants:
Teen Challenge Intl, Greater NO Teen, Greg Dill +8 more
Civil rights violationTeen Challenge IntlGreater New Orleans Teen ChallengeMt Grace Rehab CtrTeen Challenge
Troy A Autin II filed a civil rights lawsuit against Teen Challenge International and related entities and individuals in August 2003. The docket reflects preliminary proceedings, the voluntary dismissal of several individual defendants and a rehab center, and the denial of defense motions to dismiss. The case proceeded through scheduling conferences and motions for partial summary judgment before being set for trial.
Outcome: The court granted partial summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and the Louisiana Constitution. Later, the remaining claims against Teen Challenge Intl were dismissed as unopposed, and the entire lawsuit was ultimately dismissed in full with prejudice against all defendants.
The State of Mississippi sued Bethel Boys Academy and related parties for alleged abuse and neglect of children at the facility. The parties entered into a consent decree that requires the defendants to implement comprehensive safety, monitoring, and staff screening measures. The decree also mandates the removal of electric fences and the establishment of a community advisory board. The agreement resolves all claims against the defendants in the Chancery Court of George County.
Outcome: Consent decree entered; case settled; all claims dismissed.
North CarolinaNorth Carolina Court of AppealsCOA01-134Filed Apr 16, 2002
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina
Defendant:
David Benjamin Turner
Probation violationBreach of contractTeen Challenge InternationalTeen ChallengeTeen Challenge ProgramTeen Challenge program
The State of North Carolina appealed the probation violation judgments against David Benjamin Turner, who had been found to have violated probation in four separate cases. The appellate court held that the trial court failed to make sufficient findings and therefore vacated the lower court's decision, remanding the case for further proceedings. The decision addresses issues related to probation conditions, payment arrears, and compliance with a Teen Challenge program.
Lindsay Hiler filed a civil lawsuit against Hyde School in March 2002. Following extensive pre-trial proceedings, discovery motions, and an unsuccessful initial settlement conference before a magistrate judge, the district court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment. A subsequent settlement conference resulted in a reported settlement between the parties in May 2003, followed by a formal stipulation of dismissal in July 2003.
Plaintiffs filed a civil action against a private youth residential facility and its operating organization alleging breach of contract, misrepresentation, and negligence related to the enrollment and subsequent handling of a student. The student participated in a crisis intervention program and was later enrolled in the academy before taking a home visit during which he left home and encountered legal difficulties. The facility subsequently informed the parents that the student was ineligible for re-admission, prompting the lawsuit. The court ultimately granted the defendant's motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the participant admission contract.
CaliforniaCourt of Appeal, Sixth District, CaliforniaH019973, H019976Filed Aug 2, 2000
Plaintiffs:
Charleen Eymil, Eymil
Defendants:
West Shield Investigations and Security Consultants, The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Pathfinders Way, Inc. +4 more
False imprisonmentAssault and batteryIntentional infliction of emotional distressNegligent infliction of emotional distressInvasion of privacyPathfinders Wilderness ProgramPathfindersPathfinders program
A former youth program participant filed a lawsuit alleging mistreatment during her enrollment and transportation to a wilderness program for troubled youth. Defendants moved for summary judgment arguing that the claims were barred by the statute of limitations because the plaintiff was emancipated prior to turning 18. The appellate court ruled that the statute of limitations for personal injury and civil rights claims began upon emancipation and was not tolled for minors, rendering those claims time-barred, while allowing fraud and misrepresentation claims to proceed.
Outcome: Petitions for extraordinary relief granted in part and denied in part; tort and civil rights claims found time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations following emancipation, but intentional misrepresentation and fraud claims allowed to proceed.
Plaintiffs filed a civil action against CEDU and Rocky Mountain Academy alleging breach of contract, misrepresentation, and negligence concerning the enrollment and care of their son. The student had been enrolled in a private therapeutic school and crisis intervention program in Idaho, later left on home visitation, and subsequently ran away and faced juvenile criminal charges in New Jersey. The defendants moved to compel arbitration based on an arbitration clause contained within the participant admission contract.
Robert B. Hansen appealed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of Life-Line, a non‑profit corporation. He argued that his affidavit created a genuine issue of fact regarding whether his employment was at‑will. The appellate court found that he did not allege sufficient specific facts to overcome the presumption of at‑will employment and affirmed the summary judgment. The decision confirms that no implied contract modifying the at‑will relationship existed.
FederalUnited States District Court, D. MaineCIV. 98-85-P-CFiled Jan 8, 1999
Plaintiffs:
Dermot Harvey, Emily Harvey, Julian Harvey +1 more
Defendants:
Mid-Coast Hospital, Dr. James P. Rines
NegligenceMedical malpracticeHyde SchoolThe Hyde SchoolMid-Coast HospitalMaine Medical Center
Plaintiffs filed a medical malpractice action against a hospital and physician alleging negligence in the medical treatment and supervision provided to a student who was transported from a school facility for emergency care. The hospital asserted affirmative defenses including assumption of the risk and comparative negligence based on events preceding the medical treatment. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, holding that assumption of the risk is abolished and that comparative negligence principles do not apply to pre-treatment conduct that merely furnishes the occasion for subsequent medical care.
Outcome: Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment to dismiss Defendant Mid-Coast Hospital's affirmative defenses of assumption of the risk and comparative negligence is granted.
This is an appeal from the Northern District of Texas regarding a civil case involving Romaine and Charter Medical Corp. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision.
FederalUnited States District Court, N.D. CaliforniaC-87-5322 SAWFiled Oct 27, 1988
Plaintiffs:
Michael Corbett, Jacqueline Corbett, Jack M. Corbett
Defendants:
Regional Center of the East Bay, Inc., Linda McMahon, Director of the Department of Social Services, Behavior Research Institute of California
Civil rights violationJudge Rotenberg Educational CenterBehavior Research Institute of California, Inc.Behavior Research Institute of California
Plaintiffs filed an action under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act to protect a minor's educational placement and funding at a residential facility. The Department of Social Services sought clarification on whether a preliminary injunction prevented them from pursuing a license revocation action against the facility. The court ruled that state licensing authorities may proceed in good faith with license revocation proceedings under state law, provided the actions are not used as a ruse to alter the student's placement in violation of federal law.
Plaintiffs filed a civil rights lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by school and public officials to obstruct justice and prevent testimony regarding alleged abuse at an orphanage. The district court initially dismissed the claims, and subsequent proceedings led to summary judgment in favor of the defendants alongside an award of attorney's fees against the plaintiff. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reversed the attorney's fees award, concluding that the plaintiff's claims were not frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless under the applicable legal standards.
Outcome: Appellate court reversed the district court's award of attorney's fees against the plaintiff.
FederalUnited States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaC-87-5322 SAWFiled Jan 15, 1988
Plaintiffs:
Michael Corbett, Jacqueline Corbett, Jack M. Corbett +1 more
Defendants:
Regional Center for the East Bay, Inc., Linda McMahon, Director of the Department of Social Services, Regional Center for the East Bay +1 more
Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction to prevent a community agency and state department from unilaterally terminating funding and changing the residential and educational placement of their handicapped son at a behavioral research facility. The defendants had acted to relocate the youth due to concerns regarding safety and the use of restraints following medical incidents. The court evaluated whether it had jurisdiction under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act to regulate non-educational agencies providing related services and ultimately denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction.
Randolph Scott and co‑plaintiffs, former students of Mountain Mission School, sued the school and associated individuals alleging civil rights violations for abuse and neglect. The district court held that orphans were not a protected class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and dismissed the claims. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the plaintiffs failed to establish the required protected status and that the alleged conduct did not meet the statutory definition. No settlement was reached. The case remains closed with the appellate court ruling in favor of the defendants.
Outcome: Affirmed the district court's dismissal of claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and the second half of § 1985(2).
Milonas and Rice v. Williams (Provo Canyon School)
Ruling issued
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Utah; Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals691 F.2d 931 (10th Cir. 1982)Filed Jan 1, 1979
Plaintiffs:
Timothy Milonas (Nevada), Kenneth Rice (Alaska), Class of boys placed at Provo Canyon School
Defendants:
Provo Canyon School, Jack Williams, Robert H. Crist
Cruel and unusual punishment through isolation and physical forceDenial of due process for boys placed by state juvenile justice systemsCensorship of mail and use of polygraph examinationsAnti-therapeutic and inhumane treatmentProvo Canyon School (Provo, Utah)
Two teenagers sent to Provo Canyon School by their home states' juvenile justice systems escaped and brought a federal class action challenging the school's confinement, education and treatment methods. The case produced the 1980 injunction that still defines the limits on isolation, restraint, polygraphs and mail censorship at the school.
Outcome: Jury found for the school in 1980, but the district court entered a permanent injunction barring Provo Canyon School from opening, reading or censoring boys' mail, administering polygraphs, placing boys in isolation except to contain physical violence, and using physical force except to restrain a boy who is an immediate danger to himself or others. Affirmed as Milonas v. Williams, 691 F.2d 931 (10th Cir. 1982).
Candlehouse Teen Challenge v. Town of Vestal, New York
Unknown
FederalU.S. District Court, Northern District of New York3:11-cv-00093
Plaintiffs:
Candlehouse Teen Challenge, Candlehouse, Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Vestal, New York
Civil rights violationCandlehouse Teen Challenge
The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an opinion in the case of Candlehouse Teen Challenge v. Town of Vestal, New York. The plaintiff, Candlehouse Teen Challenge, alleged that the town failed to provide appropriate civil rights accommodations for a youth in its care. The court reviewed the evidence and addressed the legal claims presented. The opinion clarifies the court’s determination regarding the alleged violations. No settlement or monetary award is reported in this document.
This document listing reflects court files related to a legal dispute involving Wells Fargo Vendor Financial Services, LLC and Teen Challenge New England, Inc. The available file directory includes multiple PDF documents associated with the case. The records serve as a repository of case files rather than detailing specific allegations or final rulings.
Teen Challenge of New England, Inc. v. United States of America (Food Stamp Act review)
Unknown
FederalNone recorded1:05-cv-30167-JLT
Plaintiff:
Teen Challenge of New England, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Teen Challenge of New England
This document listing reflects a file associated with the legal matter Teen Challenge of New England, Inc. v. United States of America. The record indicates the presence of case-related documentation stored within a digital drive repository. Further details regarding specific claims, allegations, or judicial outcomes are not provided in this specific directory listing.
Teen Challenge of Fredricksburg, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Stafford County, Virginia (fair housing and RLUIPA)
Unknown
VirginiaNone recorded1:08-cv-00690-CMH-TCB
Plaintiff:
Teen Challenge of Fredericksburg, Inc.
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Stafford County, Virginia
Teen Challenge of Fredericksburg
This document is a cloud storage directory listing containing various PDF files related to a legal dispute between Teen Challenge of Fredericksburg, Inc. and the Board of Supervisors of Stafford County, Virginia. The files represent court documents or legal filings concerning the organization and county oversight or zoning matters. No specific substantive rulings or outcomes are detailed in this directory index.
Teen Challenge Referral Center, Inc., et al. v. Walker, et al. (removed from Tift County Superior Court)
Unknown
None recorded7:05-cv-00097-HL
Plaintiff:
Teen Challenge Referral Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Walker
This document appears to be a directory or file listing from a cloud storage service containing various PDF documents related to the case Teen Challenge Referral Center, Inc., et als. v. Walker et al. The text lists multiple files with shared dates, indicating ongoing document management or litigation filings. No specific allegations, claims, or final judicial outcomes are detailed in this text.
Teen Challenge International Pacific Northwest Centers v. Lane County (fair housing and land use)
Unknown
None recorded6:13-cv-00567-AA
Plaintiff:
Teen Challenge International Pacific Northwest Centers
Defendant:
Lane County
Teen Challenge International Pacific Northwest Centers
This document appears to be a file directory listing from a cloud storage service containing various PDF documents related to a legal matter between Teen Challenge International Pacific Northwest Centers and Lane County. The text shows files such as 1.pdf, 1-1.pdf, 1-2.pdf, and 1-3.pdf shared in May. No substantive case details, claims, or outcomes are detailed in the provided directory view.
Stidum v. Marco, et al. (motor vehicle; Teen Challenge New England, Inc. named)
Unknown
None recorded3:08-cv-00993-JCH
Plaintiff:
Stidum
Defendant:
Marco
This document lists court files associated with the case Stidum v. Marco et al, including shared PDF documents related to the litigation. The text indicates the presence of case documents stored in a digital drive folder. No specific factual allegations, claims, or outcomes are detailed in the provided interface text.
This document references a search result for a legal case involving Kinsale Insurance Company and Clearview Horizon, Inc., litigated in the District of Idaho in 2022. The text lists various courts and search parameters from the CourtListener legal database. No further factual details regarding the allegations or outcomes are provided in this specific excerpt.
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Training & Consulting, LLC dba Family Help and Wellness
Defendant:
Dr. Ken Huey
Wilderness Training & Consulting, LLC doing business as Family Help and Wellness filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award against Dr. Ken Huey. The petition arises from alleged troubling conduct at a residential treatment center for troubled teens in Colorado. The filing seeks judicial enforcement of the arbitration decision. The document does not provide a court name, docket number, or filing date.
FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal, First District, State of Florida1D04-0847
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
Kevin Daniel Smith
Teen Challenge
The appellate court reviewed the revocation of Kevin Daniel Smith's community control order. The State proved, by a preponderance of evidence, that Smith willfully violated two conditions of his community control: failure to report weekly and failure to complete the Teen Challenge program. The trial court’s findings were upheld, and the revocation order was affirmed. The decision confirms that the violations were substantial and willful under Florida law.
Court record - Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health
Unknown
GeorgiaFulton CountySettlement: $4,700,000
Plaintiff:
Connie Lockhart
Defendants:
Glenn Bloom, Sachin Lavania
Negligence
A patient sought medical care at a hospital and alleged that a catheter was improperly placed during a medical procedure, resulting in restricted blood flow and subsequent physical injury. The plaintiff sued the attending healthcare providers for negligence. The defendants denied liability and pointed to other parties, including a previously settled hospital. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded damages, which were subsequently reduced based on comparative negligence and liability apportionment.
Outcome: Jury award of $4.7 million, reduced to $1,269,000 due to apportionment of liability to a non-party and a finding of comparative negligence.
The plaintiffs, Lyn M. and David M., filed suit under ERISA to obtain coverage for their child L.M.'s residential treatment at Eva Carlston Academy. Premera Blue Cross denied the claims, asserting the treatment was not medically necessary. The district court considered the parties' briefs and oral arguments and granted the defendants' summary judgment while denying the plaintiffs' summary judgment. The decision affirms the denial of benefits under the health plan.
Outcome: The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees and closed the matter.
Jake and Jana Savage, along with their minor son John Doe, sued Utah Youth Village for negligent placement, fraud, breach of contract, and negligent infliction of emotional distress after a foster youth placed in their home sexually abused their child. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendant, citing Utah Code section 78-12-25.1. The Utah Supreme Court reviewed the case and decided on December 3, 2004. The appellate decision affirmed the district court’s ruling, concluding that the statute barred the plaintiffs’ claims. The case was closed following the Supreme Court’s decision.
Outcome: The district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings, holding that a civil claim for negligent placement is cognizable under Utah law and is not barred by the delayed discovery statute of limitation for child sexual abuse.
Markel American Insurance Company filed a civil action against Clearview Horizon, Inc. alleging an insurance dispute. The case is a diversity declaratory judgement proceeding in the United States District Court for the District of Montana. The docket entry lists additional defendants including Mike Linderman and Michele Manning. No resolution or settlement is indicated in this document. The case remains pending.
LouisianaState of Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit14-1028
Plaintiffs:
Amy Tepper, Eric Tepper, Leni Tepper
Defendants:
Red River Academy, LLC, Alicia Davenport Hall, 456 Insurance Company +1 more
NegligenceLack of reasonable supervisionFailure to timely obtain medical treatmentUS Youth ServicesRed River AcademyRapides Regional Medical CenterWoodworth Family Medicine
Amy Tepper and her parents appealed a trial court decision that granted summary judgment in favor of Red River Academy, LLC. The appellate court found genuine issues of material fact regarding the school’s medical care of Amy, and reversed the summary judgment. The case was remanded for further proceedings. The decision focuses on alleged negligence in the school’s handling of Amy’s medical treatment.
Outcome: Reversed summary judgment; remanded for further proceedings
The State of New Hampshire is prosecuting Mark W Davis for possession of child sexual abuse images. The notice orders him to appear for arraignment on March 5, 2021. The case involves four counts of child sexual abuse image possession. No outcome is provided in this document.
This document is a webpage interface for CaseMine, a legal research platform, and does not contain information about a specific legal case or troubled teen industry facility. It provides general information about CaseMine's features such as AI-driven parallel search, virtual legal assistants, and lawyer profile creation. No parties, claims, court actions, or case outcomes are mentioned in the text.
This document is a CM/ECF and PACER login and confirmation request page for the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. It provides instructions for electronic filing, viewing restricted case documents, and managing PACER credentials. Additionally, it displays a mandatory notice regarding the responsibility of filers to redact sensitive personal information in compliance with federal rules.
Roy O'Hara was convicted of manslaughter after a firearm he was handling discharged and killed a guest. He appealed the conviction, arguing that the trial court erred by refusing to allow further questioning of jurors who indicated familiarity with law‑enforcement witnesses. The appellate court vacated the conviction, holding that additional voir‑dire questioning was required to assess potential bias.
Kristina Martinez, as guardian ad litem for a 5-year-old, v. Sequel (Bernalillo Academy), the New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department et al.
Unknown
StateFirst Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County, New Mexico
Plaintiff:
Kristina Martinez, guardian ad litem for a 5-year-old boy
Defendants:
Bernalillo Academy / Sequel of New Mexico (Sequel Youth and Family Services subsidiary), New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department, Brian Blalock (former CYFD cabinet secretary)
In October 2024 the guardian ad litem for a 5-year-old filed suit in Santa Fe over his time at the former Bernalillo Academy, a home for children with disabilities that a Sequel subsidiary ran until December 2021. The complaint alleges staff punched and beat the boy and a peer sexually abused him, and that the academy put enrollment revenue ahead of children's safety. It also alleges the state children's agency and its former secretary knew of ongoing abuse and did not protect the children. The suit cites a Disability Rights New Mexico report that staff told children to fight each other, and says Bernalillo was Sequel's 14th program to close in three years amid abuse allegations.
In August 2024 a lawsuit was filed for M.C., a 17-year-old resident of Brighter Path Tuskegee. The complaint alleges he was physically and emotionally abused by staff and other residents, that staff instigated fights and gambled with residents while he was beaten, and that he was denied proper medical care; his father says he saw injuries during visits. It also alleges neglect, lack of supervision and unsanitary conditions. The coverage gives no specific incident dates.
A former resident who attended from 2019 to 2021 alleges she was sexually assaulted by another student and strip-searched by staff. She also alleges staff cut off family contact, misled parents, and kept her enrolled longer for financial reasons.
A former resident who attended in 2022 alleges she was strip-searched with male staff present, monitored on camera while sleeping, and denied basic medical care, including during a serious illness. The complaint also describes isolation and shunning used as discipline.
Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioners of the Department of Developmental Services and the Department of Early Education and Care
Unknown
MassachusettsCommonwealth of Massachusetts Bristol, ss Probate and Family Court Department86E-0018-GI
Plaintiffs:
Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. (formerly known as Behavior Research Institute), Dr. Matthew L. Israel, Leo Soucy, individually and as parent and next friend of Brendon Soucy +3 more
Defendants:
Commissioners of the Department of Developmental Services, Department of Early Education and Care, Office of the Commissioner (OFC) +7 more
Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit challenging emergency orders and licensing actions taken by the state Office for Children that sought to suspend the license of a residential facility for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and restrict its use of behavioral intervention techniques. The parties entered into a consent decree in 1987, which regulated the facility's operations and oversight. Years later, defendants filed a motion to vacate the consent decree under Rule 60(b)(5), arguing that the original purposes of the decree had been fulfilled, that a change in circumstances and professional standards regarding aversive interventions rendered continued enforcement inequitable, and that the decree infringed upon executive functions under the doctrine of separation of powers.
On 04/15/2025 CALEB BRONSTEIN filed a Civil - Personal Injury and Torts court case against ASCEND HEALTHCARE, LLC, in Los Angeles County Superior Courts. Court records for this case are available from Beverly Hills Courthouse.
IowaIowa District Court for Lee (South) County; Iowa Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa
Defendant:
Benjamin G. Trane
Sexual abuse in the third degree (convicted of the lesser offense of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse)Sexual exploitation by a counselor or therapistChild endangermentMidwest Academy (Keokuk, Iowa)
Benjamin G. Trane opened Midwest Academy in Keokuk, Iowa in 2003 and ran it until it closed in 2016 after state and federal agents searched the school. In 2015 a female student reported that he sexually abused her, and two male students reported physical abuse; the State of Iowa charged Trane with third-degree sexual abuse, sexual exploitation by a counselor or therapist, and child endangerment. At a jury trial in Keokuk in December 2017, a child protection worker testified that the Iowa Department of Human Services and the FBI had received a report in March 2015 that students were held in isolation rooms with human waste, and agents described searches of the school on January 28, February 1 and February 11, 2016. On December 22, 2017 the jury convicted Trane of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse, a pattern, practice or scheme to engage in sexual exploitation by a counselor or therapist, and child endangerment. He was sentenced on May 10, 2018 to nine years in prison, ten years of supervised release and sex offender registration. His appeals failed: the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the convictions in 2019 subject to a rape shield hearing, affirmed again on January 6, 2023, and on January 31, 2025 reversed a lower court's grant of a new trial on the child endangerment count.
Outcome: Convicted December 22, 2017 of assault with intent to commit sexual abuse, sexual exploitation by a counselor or therapist (pattern, practice or scheme), and child endangerment. Sentenced May 10, 2018 to 9 years in prison. Convictions affirmed by the Iowa Supreme Court (State v. Trane, 934 N.W.2d 447 (Iowa 2019); No. 21-1211, January 6, 2023). Trane reported to the Lee County jail to begin his sentence in March 2023. In postconviction proceedings the Iowa Supreme Court (No. 23-1928, January 31, 2025) reversed the grant of a new trial on the child endangerment count.
Elan One Corporation liens, judgments and UCC filings (Poland, Maine, 1987-2001)
Unknown
MaineAndroscoggin County Registry of Deeds and Maine District Court, Lewiston
Plaintiffs:
Town of Poland, Maine, Chuck R. Starbird d/b/a Minot Excavating & Construction, Owen Haskell, Inc. +1 more
Defendant:
Elan One Corporation
Unpaid town property taxes (1987 and 2001 tax liens)Unpaid excavation work (1991 mechanics lien)Unpaid debt (1993 District Court judgment)Secured financing later terminated (Riviera Finance UCC filing)Elan School (Poland Spring, Maine)
These are debt records against Elan One Corporation, the company that owned the Elan School property in Poland, Maine, not lawsuits about the school's treatment of students. The Town of Poland recorded a tax lien in May 1987 for 8,108.54 dollars in 1986 taxes plus 443.86 dollars interest. Chuck R. Starbird, doing business as Minot Excavating & Construction, filed a mechanics lien on February 1, 1991 for 3,627.62 dollars of excavation work done between October and December 1990. Owen Haskell, Inc. won a 1,085 dollar judgment plus 35 dollars costs against Elan One in the Lewiston District Court on June 16, 1993, with a writ of execution dated October 1, 1993. The town recorded another tax lien on July 16, 2001 for 7,617.81 dollars still unpaid. Riviera Finance filed a termination of its financing statement against Elan One (date not legible), and a lien discharge for a creditor named Snow is in the file but its text could not be read.
Outcome: The documents show the Riviera Finance financing statement terminated and a lien discharge filed for a creditor named Snow; they do not show whether the tax liens, the mechanics lien or the 1993 judgment were paid.
Joseph J. Ricci, et al. v. Key Bancshares of Maine, Inc., et al.
Settled
FederalUnited States District Court for the District of Maine82-0249-P
Plaintiffs:
Joseph J. Ricci, Gerald E. Davidson, Golden Ark Enterprises, Inc. +10 more
Defendants:
Key Bancshares of Maine, Inc., Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc., Key Bank of Central Maine
Credit discrimination based on Joseph Ricci's national origin under the Equal Credit Opportunity ActFailure to give Gerald Davidson a statement of reasons for denying creditBreach of the line of credit agreement and of the duty of good faithIntentional infliction of emotional distress on Joseph RicciElan School (Poland Spring, Maine)
This is a banking case brought by Elan's owners, not a case about the treatment of students. Elan School founders Joseph J. Ricci and Gerald E. Davidson and their companies, including Golden Ark Enterprises and the Elan One through Elan Eight corporations, sued Key Bancshares of Maine and Key Bank of Southern Maine in federal court in Maine over the banks' termination of their line of credit. A jury found for the plaintiffs in April 1987 and assessed 15 million dollars in damages, and Judge James L. Watson of the Court of International Trade, sitting by designation, upheld the verdict on June 16, 1987 and ordered a 15 million dollar attachment on the banks' Maine real estate. The judgment of April 29, 1987 was satisfied in full by a settlement on July 31, 1987, and the release was recorded in Androscoggin County in February 1989.
Outcome: A jury found for the Elan owners and companies in April 1987 and assessed 15 million dollars in damages; the court added 10,000 dollars in punitive damages on each of two federal counts, set aside a 12.5 million dollar punitive award, denied the banks' motions for a new trial, and on June 16, 1987 ordered a 15 million dollar attachment on the banks' Maine property. On July 31, 1987 the plaintiffs acknowledged the judgment had been satisfied in full by settlement and the attachment was discharged. The settlement amount is not stated.
Martha Amesbury v. Golden Ark Enterprises and Elan One Corporation
Unknown
MaineMaine Superior Court, Cumberland County
Plaintiff:
Martha Amesbury
Defendants:
Golden Ark Enterprises, Elan One Corporation
Underlying claims are not stated in the documentCourt-ordered attachment of 65,000 dollars against Elan One Corporation's real propertyElan School (Poland Spring, Maine)
Martha Amesbury sued Golden Ark Enterprises and Elan One Corporation, companies behind the Elan School, in Cumberland County Superior Court in Maine. The only document is an order of attachment signed at Portland in 1987 which, after a hearing and by agreement of the parties, allowed a 65,000 dollar attachment on Elan One's real estate; it was received at the Androscoggin County Registry of Deeds on December 28 (the year is partly illegible). The order refers to her affidavit but does not say what the lawsuit was about. The documents do not show how the case ended.
Outcome: After a hearing and with the parties' agreement, the court ordered a 65,000 dollar attachment on Elan One Corporation's real property, finding a reasonable likelihood the plaintiff would recover at least that much.
MaineMaine Superior Court, Androscoggin CountyCV-79-613
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. MacKerron
Defendants:
Elan One, Central Maine Power Company (party in interest), Depositors Trust Company of Southern Maine (party in interest)
Foreclosure and sale of two parcels in Poland, Maine, under two defaulted mortgagesDefault on two 30,750 dollar promissory notes from Elan One's February 1, 1974 land purchaseAbout 16,973.51 dollars claimed due on each noteElan School (Poland Spring, Maine)
This is a mortgage foreclosure case, not an abuse case. Beverly J. MacKerron sued Elan One, the Maine company behind the Elan School, in Androscoggin County Superior Court in November 1979; the complaint is dated November 14, 1979. She and Neil D. MacKerron had sold Elan One Corporation two parcels on Upper Range Pond in Poland on February 1, 1974 for two promissory notes of 30,750 dollars secured by mortgages, and the complaint says Elan One stopped paying in October 1979, with about 16,973.51 dollars due on each note. Central Maine Power, which held a 1975 power-line easement across the land, and Depositors Trust Company, which held a 1979 mortgage, were named as parties in interest. The documents show only the complaint and the clerk's certificate of filing, not the result.
Wood, et al. v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, Inc., et al.
Unknown
UtahFifth Judicial District Court, Washington County, Utah120500380
Plaintiffs:
William Chase Wood (aka Chase McKinney), et al. (357 numbered former students and parents)
Defendants:
World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, Inc. (WWASPS), Robert B. Lichfield, Ken Kay +13 more
Physical, emotional and sexual abuse of students at WWASPS programsNegligence and respondeat superiorActual and constructive fraud in marketing to parentsBreach of contract and warrantyCivil conspiracy and fraudulent concealment of abuseCross Creek Center for Boys (La Verkin, Utah)Cross Creek Manor (La Verkin, Utah)Cross Creek Academy (Utah)Brightway Adolescent Hospital (La Verkin, Utah)Majestic Ranch Academy (Randolph, Utah)+18 more
William Chase Wood and several hundred other former students and their parents sued the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASPS), founder Robert Lichfield, his business partners and dozens of affiliated programs, marketing and billing companies in Utah's Fifth Judicial District Court in Washington County. The document on file is the plaintiffs' 228-page first amended complaint, submitted July 24, 2013, which refers to claim sheets filed in the case on December 17, 2012 in opposition to a WWASPS motion to dismiss. It alleges that students placed at WWASPS programs in Utah, other states, Mexico, Jamaica, Costa Rica, Samoa and the Czech Republic from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s were beaten, restrained, locked in isolation and small boxes or cages, denied food and medical care, sexually abused and forced to work without pay. It alleges the programs operated as a single enterprise that deceived parents and concealed the abuse, and brings negligence, fraud, contract, conspiracy and emotional distress claims. The document does not show how the case ended.
UtahFifth Judicial District Court, Washington County, Utah
Plaintiff:
Shayrena Penn
Defendant:
Diamond Ranch Academy, Inc.
Negligent hiring, retention and supervisionAssaultBatteryIntentional infliction of emotional distressPunitive damagesDiamond Ranch Academy (Hurricane, Utah)
Former student Shayrena Penn sued Diamond Ranch Academy in Utah's Fifth Judicial District Court in Washington County; the complaint is dated April 29, 2021. She alleges that during a four- to five-month stay that began when she was 15, staff restrained her as punishment using pressure points, held her down while she said she could not breathe, and pressed her face into the ground so hard that she suffered lasting paralysis on the left side of her face. It also alleges sleep deprivation, strip searches, forced exercise with water withheld, inadequate clothing in winter, and weeks of isolation. It names five staff members and brings negligent hiring and supervision, assault, battery and emotional distress claims. The document on file is the complaint and does not show how the case ended.
Houlahan v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, et al.
On appeal
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Columbia1:04-cv-01161
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Houlahan
Defendants:
World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools, et al.
Thomas G. Houlahan was the plaintiff in a federal case against the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASP) and others in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The only document on file is the report of the plaintiff's expert witness, industry consultant Lon Woodbury, filed as an exhibit on February 1, 2006. Woodbury's report compares WWASP programs to industry standards, citing referral fees, commission-paid marketers, enrollments far over 200, open-ended phone blackouts, students used as junior staff to enforce discipline, and more abuse claims and closures than at other programs. The document does not state the plaintiff's claims or how the case ended.
Outcome: Clerk's Judgment was entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff, a motion for a new trial was denied, and the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal.
UtahFifth Judicial District Court, Washington County, Utah
Plaintiff:
Jordan Alexander Zanolini
Defendant:
Liahona Academy for Youth, LLC
Punching and pressure-point restraints by staffForced to stand outside in freezing temperatures in shortsForced to wear diapers for monthsMade to sit facing a wall from 6 am to 10 pm for weeksNegligent hiring and supervisionLiahona Academy (Virgin, Utah)
Jordan Zanolini, a former student placed at Liahona Academy in Virgin, Utah as a minor, sued Liahona Academy for Youth, LLC in a complaint dated April 26, 2021 in Utah's Fifth Judicial District Court in Washington County. He alleges staff punched him and repeatedly restrained him with pressure points, that the program director lifted him by the neck, threw him across a room and rubbed his face into a carpet, and that he was made to stand outside in freezing weather in shorts. He also alleges he was forced to wear diapers for months and punished on work crew by sitting facing a wall from 6 am to 10 pm for weeks. The copy on file has no case number and does not show an outcome.
Kennefick and Whitcomb v. Lifeline for Youth, et al.
Filed
UtahBountiful Judicial District Court, Davis County, Utah
Plaintiffs:
Joseph Kennefick, Hillary Whitcomb, Estate of Joseph Hunter Kennefick
Defendants:
Lifeline for Youth, Lifeline Behavioral Health, LLC, Life-Line, Inc. +3 more
Counselors took residents out and supplied them alcohol and drugsBreach of contract and fraudulent inducementNegligent hiring, training and retentionIntentional and negligent infliction of emotional distressWrongful deathLifeline for Youth (North Salt Lake, Utah)
Joseph Kennefick and Hillary Whitcomb, individually and for the estate of their son Joseph Hunter Kennefick, filed a complaint dated October 19, 2018 in Davis County, Utah against Lifeline for Youth and related entities. They allege that in 2011, while their son was 13 or 14 and in residential drug treatment at Lifeline, two of his counselors took him and other youths out, supplied them alcohol and drugs, and encouraged them to use. The complaint alleges this set off years of relapse and contributed to his death in September 2018 at age 21, and brings thirteen claims including breach of contract, fraud, negligent hiring and wrongful death. The copy on file carries no case number or filing stamp and does not show an outcome. This is a different case from Whitcomb and Clifford v. InnerChange Chrysalis already on the page.
FederalU.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division2:18-cv-35-TC-DAO
Plaintiffs:
John R., Charles R.
Defendants:
United Behavioral Health, The Guardian Choice Plus POS Plan for Home Office Employees
Wrongful denial of ERISA health plan benefitsInsurer refused coverage for wilderness and residential treatmentDenials based on medical necessity and claim-filing deadlinesSummit Achievement (Maine)Second Nature Blue Ridge Wilderness Therapy (Georgia)In Balance Ranch Academy (Arizona)
John R. and his son Charles R. sued United Behavioral Health and his employer's health plan under ERISA after the insurer denied coverage for the son's treatment as a teenager from 2014 to 2016. The treatment included about two months at Summit Achievement wilderness program in Maine, about two and a half months at Second Nature Blue Ridge in Georgia, and about a year and a half at In Balance Ranch Academy in Arizona. The insurer denied the Summit and In Balance claims on procedural grounds and the Second Nature claim as not medically necessary. On September 24, 2021 Judge Tena Campbell granted summary judgment to the defendants and affirmed all three denials. The case is about insurance coverage, not abuse at the programs.
Outcome: On September 24, 2021 the court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and denied the plaintiffs' motion, upholding the denial of coverage for all three programs.
Scott Green and Michele Green v. Susan L. Scheff, et al.
Filed
FloridaCircuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida
Plaintiffs:
Scott Green, Michele Green
Defendants:
Susan L. Scheff, Parents Universal Resource Experts, Inc., Focal Point Academy, LLC +2 more
Fraud in the inducement by a referral service that hid per-student kickbacksBreach of contractBreach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealingBreach of fiduciary dutyUnjust enrichmentFocal Point Academy (Mesquite, Nevada)
Scott and Michele Green sued Sue Scheff, her referral company Parents Universal Resource Experts (P.U.R.E.), Focal Point Academy of Mesquite, Nevada, its co-owner Glen Horlacher, and recruiter Boyd Hooper in Broward County, Florida circuit court; the complaint is dated June 2007. They allege Scheff presented herself as an unpaid parent advocate while Focal Point paid her per referral, and that Hooper posed as a school administrator while working as a paid recruiter. They allege the school misrepresented its accreditation, therapy and teachers, never did the paid assessment, let their son choose his own medications, left an ear infection untreated, and did nothing when he reported repeated beatings and sexual assaults by other students, instead isolating him when he tried to call home. They allege they removed him in 2006 and never received a promised refund. The document shows only the complaint.
Falcon Ridge Ranch, Inc., et al. v. Sequel Youth Services of Red Rock Canyon, LLC, et al.
Filed
UtahFifth Judicial District Court in and for Washington County, State of Utah200500204
Plaintiffs:
Falcon Ridge Ranch, Inc., Red Rock Canyon School, L.L.C., Lava Heights Academy, Inc. +6 more
Defendants:
Sequel Youth Services of Red Rock Canyon, LLC, Sequel Youth Services of Falcon Ridge Ranch, LLC, Sequel Youth Services of Lava Heights, LLC +2 more
Petition to confirm an arbitration award under the Utah Uniform Arbitration ActUnderlying dispute over Sequel's 2016 purchase of the four CARE SchoolsSequel's indemnification claim for its 2017 settlement with the United States and Nevada over referral fees tied to Nevada Medicaid studentsSellers' counterclaim that Sequel breached the purchase agreement and good faith duties to avoid an earn-out paymentFalcon Ridge Ranch (Utah)Red Rock Canyon School (St. George, Utah)Lava Heights Academy (Utah)Mount Pleasant Academy (Utah)
Frank Habibian and the companies that sold Falcon Ridge Ranch, Red Rock Canyon School, Lava Heights Academy and Mount Pleasant Academy (the CARE Schools) to Sequel Youth Services in August 2016 asked a Utah state court in Washington County to confirm an arbitration award against the Sequel buyers; the amended petition is dated May 11, 2020. In the arbitration, Sequel sought indemnity for a June 2017 settlement of about $2.58 million it paid the United States and Nevada after self-reporting that the schools had paid referral fees for students covered by Nevada Medicaid. The arbitrator dismissed that claim because Sequel settled without notifying the sellers, found the sellers had been ignorant of the law rather than fraudulent, and ruled that Sequel breached the purchase agreement in how it ran the schools after the sale. This is a business dispute between a program's sellers and buyers, not an abuse case, but it documents the referral-fee practice and the Medicaid settlement. The documents do not show whether the court confirmed the award.
Outcome: In the underlying AAA arbitration (No. 01-17-0005-9666), the arbitrator issued an Interim Award on March 2, 2020, and a Final Award on May 1, 2020, denying the Sequel buyers' claims, granting the sellers' counterclaim (a contingent payment of at least $3,118,445), and awarding the sellers $1,300,000 in fees and costs. The sellers filed this amended petition on May 11, 2020, asking the court to confirm the awards; the documents do not show the court's ruling.
Rowenna Clark v. Solstice RTC, LLC dba Solstice Residential Treatment Center
Filed
UtahSecond Judicial District Court, Davis County, Farmington Department, State of Utah
Plaintiff:
Rowenna Clark
Defendant:
Solstice RTC, LLC dba Solstice Residential Treatment Center
Medical negligence under the Utah Medical Malpractice ActRefusing a resident's requests to go to the hospitalFailing to monitor and act on failing vital signsNo medical professional on siteNegligent policies for passing on resident health informationSolstice Residential Treatment Center (Layton, Utah)
Rowenna Clark sued Solstice RTC, LLC, which runs Solstice Residential Treatment Center in Layton, Utah, in Utah state court in Davis County; the complaint is signed January 27, 2017. She alleges that in late August 2014, shortly after she turned 18 at Solstice, she became acutely ill for several days and staff refused her repeated requests to go to the hospital, dismissed her low blood pressure as an equipment error, and relied on a nurse who was mostly off site. She alleges she was finally taken to Davis Hospital with septic shock and kidney failure, was placed on life support in an induced coma for about eleven days, and has lasting health problems. The complaint states a DOPL prelitigation panel issued its certificate of compliance on December 2, 2016. The document shows only the complaint; no case number is filled in.
A former resident sued the school and its then-owner over his confinement and treatment. Part of a run of civil suits during the Charter years alleging abuse, false imprisonment, medical negligence and First Amendment violations.
Outcome: Fifth Circuit opinion issued December 9, 1998 (CourtListener). One of the 1980s and 1990s suits over confinement and treatment at the school.
Defendants:
Discovery Ranch Academy, University of Utah, Pilcrow Advisors
Negligence leading to a resident's deathViolation of the facility's own suicide prevention policiesFailure to create a care plan and provide adequate supervisionFailure to restrict access to harmful items despite known suicide riskDiscovery Ranch Academy (Utah)
The parents of 17-year-old Biruk Silvers sued Discovery Ranch Academy in Utah, alleging staff negligence led to their son's death in November 2024. Biruk had shared suicidal thoughts with his psychiatrist and disclosed dangerous oxygen-deprivation behavior to a therapist, yet staff allowed him to be alone and failed to restrict access to harmful items, including a belt. A state investigation found Discovery Ranch violated its own suicide prevention policies, failed to create a care plan, and did not provide adequate supervision; the facility was fined but remains licensed. The suit also names the University of Utah (employer of Biruk's psychiatrist) and Pilcrow Advisors, the educational consultant that recommended the program. Reported by Jessica Schreifels.
Plaintiff:
P.R. (former student, identified by initials)
Defendants:
Red Rock Canyon School, Sequel Youth and Family Services
Sexual abuse of a minor by staffStaff knowledge and facilitation of the abuseConcealment of abuse and removal of the victim to limit liabilityNegligence and failure to protectRed Rock Canyon School (St. George, Utah)
Civil lawsuit filed against the now-closed Red Rock Canyon School in St. George, Utah and its parent company Sequel Youth and Family Services by former student P.R., who alleges she was sexually abused and impregnated by staff member Atonio Kavea while a minor, with the knowledge and alleged facilitation of other personnel including Kavea's sister, Asiah Kavea. The suit claims the school attempted to conceal the abuse and remove P.R. rather than protect her, and seeks over $10 million in damages. Reported by KUTV (Liv Kelleher) on 06/10/2025.